Time: Sat Sep 20 22:10:13 1997 by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA15642; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:44:35 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:44:20 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Keyes: Communist China and Treason (fwd) <snip> > >To help the Keyes 2000 Committee, send e-mail to >davidq@SoCA.com > >Please distribute this transcript. >====================================== >The Alan Keyes Show >September 19, 1997 >Subject: Communist China and Treason > >Opening voice-over by announcer: "According to >Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, Communist China >will soon dominate the world." > >(Senator Frist's voice) "Within ten years nations >like China are going to overpower us in every >single way." > >Announcer: "The Fristean countdown to Communist >China's domination of the world has begun." > >(clock ticking) > >Alan Keyes: As of today, Friday, September 19th, >1997, there are 5,333 days left until world >domination by the Communist Chinese. At least, if >you believe Bill Frist. > >Of course, you know, the way things are coming out >these days, if you believe some of the other >folks, I don't know. His prediction may be off by >a little bit, but if we continue to let global >internationalists like Mr. Frist vote away our >technology, vote away our sovereignty, vote away >protections for our basic and vital national >interests, the Communist Chinese or somebody else, >anybody else, may be able to walk through the door >and take the place over. > >================================== > >Will we come to our senses in time? I think >that's part of what we try to answer here on the >Alan Keyes Show, as we share information with >folks about what is going on. And with reference, >by the way, to this China business -- and it is >one of the reasons that I didn't feel at all badly >about playing our little China piece every day -- >because in all honesty, I don't think that the >prediction Mr. Frist made is a valid or viable one >at all, UNLESS we follow the courses of action >that he has been following: voting for treaties >that are bad for our national interest; allowing >access to technology that gives our enemies an >ability to harm us militarily; giving away our >economic advantages -- yeah! If we do THAT, we're >gonna be hurt. > >And we are, unhappily, in the process of seeing >that happen, particularly under this >administration. And while we are dealing with the >questions of "campaign money and corruption," I >really wish -- I say it all the time, and I >prayerfully would hope -- that Americans would >start to concentrate on the essentials here. It >is not only a question of money, and who gave it, >and the money trail, and all this garbage that the >degenerate propaganda media emphasizes. The >question is not only who paid what when, but who >GOT what for it. We need to look at the quid pro >quo, particularly where the Chinese are concerned. > >There is an article in the paper today, for >instance. The headlines read: "US May Sell >Nuclear Technology to China." > >"China has made substantial progress in curbing >nuclear assistance to Iran and Pakistan, and that >may allow President Clinton soon to clear the way >for sales of US nuclear power technology to >Beijing." Isn't that wonderful? > >Now, you will note that this is the same Communist >Chinese regime that was just cited as providing >Iran with help in developing their missile >technology for delivering nuclear and other >weapons. That's great behavior! THAT shows that >they're not going to abuse us. These are the same >folks who have been helping the terrorists, >selling these landmines. You know, they say, "ban >the landmines; have this treaty." You know who >provides a good deal of the landmines, the cheap >ones that are actually killing the innocent >people? The Chinese Government. So, in exchange >for this wonderful behavior, we are going to sell >them our nuclear technology. > >Now, of course, they'll tell you, "This is just >for peaceful purposes. This is to help them >develop economically." Meanwhile you have, on >another front, the following headline: "Analyst: >China's Working On Ways To Win War With US." >"The Chinese military is developing ways to >overcome America's high-tech weaponry and defeat >the United States in a future military face-off, a >Pentagon analyst told the Senate Select Committee >on Intelligence Thursday. Committee Chairman >Richard Shelby, Republican of Alabama, said China >poses the greatest intelligence challenge to the >United States, because 'as an emerging economic >and military power, China has the option, and >increasingly the will, to challenge vital US >interests around the globe.' But the harshest >assessment came from Michael Pillsbury, an expert >on China at the Pentagon's National Defense >University. He said his translations of Chinese >military publications show remarkably accurate >descriptions of weaknesses in US weapons. 'A >common theme,' Pillsbury said, 'is a Chinese >military view that America is a declining power, >with but two or three decades of primacy left." > >See? The Frist View. Mr. Frist! Senator Frist! >Your view, that you picked up, brainwashed, from >some stupid staffer, your view happens to be the >official Communist Chinese military view. And >you're touting it on radio stations on the United >States. You ought to check your sources. > >Anyway, he said that "they believe US military >forces, while dangerous at present, are >vulnerable, even deeply flawed, and can be >defeated with the right strategy. That strategy >involves using new technology to defeat the >superior with the inferior." > >Do you get it? > >Now, where are they going to find the wherewithal >to do this, to develop the strategy that defeats >us? They're going to get it by getting our >supercomputers, which they have gotten through the >Clinton Administration. They're gonna get it by >getting our nuclear technology, which they will >get through the Clinton Administration. How are >they going to pay for it? They are going to pay >for it with the foreign exchange they earn by >dumping their cheap goods on America's markets, >made with their slave labor in labor camps in >Communist China. All facilitated by the >Frist-types, all facilitated by the globalists, >all facilitated by the Bob Dole -- "we need fast >track" -- types, who are telling us that we should >surrender American sovereignty, while the Chinese >and everybody else are exploiting our >vulnerabilities to destroy this country for future >generations. > >Is this what we owe our children? See, it really >does upset me. Because I think that this is not >only stupid; from the point of view of our >obligations to this nation, to our children, to >future generations, it's treason. And we're the >ones who are committing it. We are betraying the >interests of our country by tolerating folks who >follow policies that aid and abet the very enemies >who are plotting, planning, strategizing, our >destruction, based on these weaknesses, which are >being aided and abetted by folks in the Clinton >Administration and everywhere else -- the moral >weaknesses that are destroying our society from >within, and the weaknesses in our ability to >prevent, through espionage and other access, the >exploitation of our technological advantage, so >that we transfer it to other countries that are >hostile to us. > >And when you read all these stories: "US May Sell >Nuclear Technology To China" -- the Clinton >Administration championing that; Mr. Clinton >intervening in order to make sure the Chinese have >their little beachhead in Long Beach, and are able >to establish their espionage; Mr. Clinton getting >money from Charlie Trie, that comes, apparently, >through banks that are owned by the Chinese >Government and facilitating all of this >corruption. > >Are we so stupid we don't see what's going on? >And if we see what's going on, how come we don't >demand that Fred Thompson stop playing games, and >start focusing on the things that really matter, >and that are really hurting us right now? >Decisions are STILL being taken, which we have to >suspect are the result of corruption by the >Communist Chinese and the money that they have >given to the Clinton Administration. This isn't >something that's over with; it's something that's >going on right now. And instead of focusing on >it, Mr. Thompson proposes to look at campaign >finance reform bills for the next several weeks. >Spinning his wheels. And meanwhile allowing the >truth to go begging, because the Democratic >thug-type gangsters in the Congress are engaging >in their cover-up of Mr. Clinton's illicit >behavior. > >Our security sold down the river; the Democrats, >like thugs and gangsters, trying to make sure the >witnesses never come forward to testify, and the >Republicans too much whimps, too much in the >pocket of some puppeteers, to stand up valiantly >against it and let the American people know what's >going on. This doesn't work. And yet we sit >here, day after day, watching this sickening >spectacle, knowing somewhere in the back of our >minds that, however innocent it looks, it portends >the demise of this great republic and the liberty >we are supposed to represent. This doesn't work. > >================ > >I think people shouldn't underestimate the extent >to which the willingness to corrupt our electoral >process represents an assault on the sovereignty >of the American people. It is a crime that >strikes at the very fountainhead of the authority >of our governmental institutions -- which, once >corrupted, must lose our confidence and support. >If we let it go on -- and we are letting it go on >-- if we accept phony instead of real solutions, >we'll be destroying our republic. > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail