Time: Sat Sep 06 22:49:07 1997
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 21:35:14 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: SLS: Meador's Oklahoma law suit
CIVBRI~1.ASC is attached in BinHex encoding.
I can also encode in MIME and Uuencode.
This law suit attacked the legality of the
Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration
between Oklahoma state and the IRS.
It contains lots of excellent and current
legal evidence.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
p.s. .ASC and .BAK are identical copies
My letter to the Oklahoma Tax Commission now follows:
[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
MEMO
TO: David K. Smith
Oklahoma Tax Commission
State of Oklahoma
c/o 2501 Lincoln Blvd.
Oklahoma City 73194-0001/tdc
OKLAHOMA STATE
FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law
DATE: June 2, 1997
SUBJECT: Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration
between Oklahoma Tax Commission and "IRS" [sic]
I have recently come to possess a photocopy of your Agreement on
Coordination of Tax Administration, executed between the Oklahoma
Tax Commission and the Internal Revenue Service, as requested and
received by a Citizen of Oklahoma state on May 16, 1997.
In Section 2: Definitions, We find the following definition:
2.2 IRS The term "IRS" means the Internal Revenue Service,
U.S. Department of the Treasury [sic].
[bold emphasis added]
Please provide Us with the exact citation(s) within Title 31,
United States Code, which authorize the Internal Revenue Service
to exist as a department or bureau within the U.S. Department of
the Treasury. Our reading of Title 31 tells Us that the Internal
Revenue Service is not listed among those subordinate bureaus and
departments, unlike the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, which
is listed therein. See 31 C.F.R. 51.2 and 52.2 for regulations.
Please also take note of the fact that Title 31, United States
Code ("U.S.C."), has been enacted into positive law, rendering it
conclusive evidence of the statutes in question. By comparison,
Title 26, U.S.C., has not been enacted into positive law, which
means that Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") section 7851(a)(6)(A)
now controls the applicability of all of subtitle F of the IRC --
Procedure and Administration.
The term "this title" as that term is used at IRC 7851(a)(6)(A)
refers to Title 26, U.S.C. For proof, compare, in pari materia,
the Historical and Statutory Notes following 28 U.S.C. 132, with
the original Act dated June 25, 1948, C. 646, Sections 2 to 39,
62 Stat. 985 to 991, as amended, specifically under the sub-
heading "Continuation of Organization of Court" [sic].
While you are investigating your answer to this question, please
allow Us also to refer you specifically to the California Supreme
Court case of People v. Boxer, docket number S-030016, dated
December 1992. See Full Faith and Credit Clause for authority.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
Postal Zone 85719/tdc
email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.2:
preferred, to conserve all resources)
phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line:
please get permission to disclose)
fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy:
available 24-hours per day or night)
fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (dedicated email line:
please call phone: to switch software)
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
The Internet
# # #
Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\CIVBRI~1.ASC"
Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\CIVBRI~1.BAK"
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
:
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
_____________________________________:
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]From ???@??? Fri Sep 05 15:47:26 1997
by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA24115;
Fri, 5 Sep 1997 14:18:08 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 14:18:08 -0700
To: bosinc@swbell.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: meaning of "national" and other matters
At 03:45 PM 9/5/97 -0500, you wrote:
>paul,
>just received your ltr today and must say i am confused by the computer
>brochures and the brevity of your note.
Bill,
I am getting inundated with all kinds
of email and regular mail. Can you
rewind to that point for me, if you don't
mind? I am sending out HP brochures,
because I regard the package to be a
very good starter machine for serious
Internet users. HP's technical support
is consistently ranked tops, so this
would relieve me of the need to provide
computer support, when I am not getting
paid for it. My time is better spent on
the legal research, because the payoff
for the nation is so much greater.
i will read the case you
>highlighted; but would sincerely like to hear from someone that has made
>it clear of the feds without serving time.
I have been up before several federal judges,
as a litigant, and as a counsel. I have not
ever been charged with a crime, even though
I had one judge threaten me with prison
if I did not appear for an IRS summons.
So, you have now heard from "someone who has
made it clear of the feds without serving
time." Where do we go now, in this dialogue,
you and I?
there has to be someone that
>will share their experiences without being paranoid.
I am loading into the Supreme Law Library
EVERY SINGLE PLEADING which I have already
filed, on my own behalf, or on behalf of
clients who have, in almost all cases,
signified their acceptance of the work by
signing and filing these pleadings. Their
signatures will be shown as follows:
/s/ John E. Trumane
If a signature line does not exhibit this
type of "signature," then they did not
sign the pleading in question. Our webmaster
is hard at work designing and preparing the
massive number of files (almost 500). It is
just going to take time; we are also actively
soliciting financial support for the webmaster,
who is being paid at his standard professional
rate, because he deserves it. He is good, and
has earned his right to charge what he does.
I am not paranoid, although I do admit that
there was a long period in my life when I was
paralyzed with fear. With God's help and
a willing heart, He pulled me out of that
terrible paralysis, so I do give credit
Where credit is due.
>
>i do have a technical question about "nationals" but will post it for
>all.
The term is defined by federal statutes,
whereas the Qualifications Clauses are
in the Constitution, and have been since
the year 1788. Congress cannot amend the
U.S. Constitution; only the several states
can do so, by a three-fourths vote. So,
you are on much firmer ground by claiming
a status which is recognized in the Qualifications
Clauses at 1:2:2, 1:3:3, and 2:1:5. These
Clauses have never been amended, although a
recent attempt did fail. This matter is
covered in some detail in Gilbertson's
OPENING BRIEF.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
>
>thank you and good luck, bill
You are very welcome. Thanks to you also
for your continuing support. It means
so very much to all of Us who have been
working so hard to make progress with
the massive fraud which has been perpetrated
upon the entire American Population.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail