Time: Sun Sep 07 01:12:01 1997
	by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA24392;
	Sun, 7 Sep 1997 19:33:16 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 19:33:11 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]

>Extract from "The World Order," by Eustace Mullins
>	Although the World Order has control of the legal 
>system and the courts, it remains vulnerable to any 
>enforcement of the pre-existing body of law which the host 
>had formulated to protect his society.  This body of law 
>forbids everything that the parasite is doing, and forces the 
>parasite to maintain a precarious existence outside of the 
>law.  If the law were to be enforced at any time, the parasite 
>would be dislodged.  The existing body of law clearly 
>forbids the operation of criminal syndicates, which is 
>precisely what the hegemony of parasitism and its World 
>Order is.  Criminal syndicalism denies the equal protection 
>of the law to citizens.  Only by acting against criminal 
>syndicalism can the state protect its citizens.
>	Corpus Juris Secundum 16:  Constitutional Law 
>213(10) states:  "The Constitutional guaranty of freedom of 
>speech does not include the right to advocate, or conspire 
>to effect, the violent destruction or overthrow of the 
>government or the criminal destruction of property.  
>214:  The Constitutional guaranty of the right of assembly 
>was never intended as a license for illegality or invitation 
>for fraud -- the right of freedom of assembly may be abused 
>by using assembly to incite violence and crime, and the 
>people through their legislatures may protect themselves 
>against the abuse."
>	The assembly of any World Order organization, 
>such as the Council on Foreign Relations or any 
>foundation, is subject to the laws against fraud (their 
>charters claim they are engaged in philanthropy), and 
>enforcement of the laws against criminal syndicalism 
>would end the institutions through which the World Order 
>illegally rules the people of the United States, the illegal 
>conspiracies and the introduction of alien laws into our 
>system by the foundations' instructions to Congress.
>	We have already shown that the Rockefeller
>Foundation and other key organizations of the World Order 
>are "Syndicates," which are engaged in the practice of 
>criminal syndicalism.  But what is a "syndicate"?  The 
>Oxford English Dictionary [OED] notes that the word stems 
>from "syndic."  A syndic is defined as "an officer of 
>government, a chief magistrate, a deputy."  In 1601 
>R. Johnson wrote in Kingd and commw "especiall men, 
>called Syndiques, who haue the managing of the whole 
>commonwealth."  [Ed. Note:  Old English spelling]  Thus 
>the Rockefeller Foundation and its associated groups are 
>carrying out their delegated function of managing the entire 
>commonwealth, but not for the benefit of the people, or of 
>any government except the secret super-government, the 
>World Order, which they serve.  The OED further defines a 
>syndic as "a censor of the actions of another.  To accuse." 
>Here too, the syndicate functions, according to its definition -- 
>the syndicate censors all thought and media, primarily to 
>protect its own power.  It also brings accusations -- as
>many American citizens have found to their sorrow.  Not 
>even Sir Walter Raleigh was immune.  When he interfered 
>with the international money trade, he was accused of 
>"treason" and beheaded.
>	The OED defines a "syndicate" as follows:
>"3.  A combination of capitalists and financiers entered into 
>for the purpose of prosecuting a scheme requiring large 
>sources of capital, especially one having the object of 
>obtaining control of the market in a particular commodity.  
>To control, manage or effect by a syndicate." Note the key 
>words in this definition -- a combination -- prosecuting -- 
>obtaining control.  The scheme does not require "large 
>capital" -- it requires "large sources of  capital," the bank of 
>England or the Federal Reserve System.
>	Corpus Juris Secundum 22A says of Criminal
>Syndicalism, "In a prosecution for being a member of an 
>organization which teaches and abets criminal 
>syndicalism, evidences of crimes committed by past or
>present members of the organization in their capacity as 
>members is admissible to show its character."  People v. 
>LaRue 216 P 627 C.A. 276.  Thus testimony about John 
>Foster Dulles financing the Nazi Government of Germany, 
>his telegram starting the Korean War, and other evidence 
>can be used to indict any member of the Rockefeller 
>Foundation in any state or locality in which the Rockefeller 
>Foundation has ever been active in any way.  Since these 
>organizations are all closely interlocked, and there is so 
>much available evidence of their illegal operations, it will be 
>relatively simple to obtain criminal convictions against them 
>for their criminal syndicalist operations.
>	Corpus Juris Secundum 22, Criminal Law 
>185(10); Conspiracy and Monopolies:  "Where the statute
>makes mere membership in an organization formed to
>promote syndicalism a crime, without an overt act, this
>offense is indictable in any county into which a member 
>may go during the continuance of his membership, and
>this is true although such member comes into a county
>involuntarily.  People v. Johansen, 226 P 634, 66 C.A. 343."
>	Corpus Juris Secundum 22, Criminal Law 
>sec. 182(3) states, "A prosecution for conspiracy to commit 
>an offense against the U.S. may also be tried in any district 
>wherein any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is 
>performed.  U.S. v. Cohen C.A.N.J. 197 F 2d 26."  Thus a 
>publication by the Council on Foreign Relations promoting 
>the stripping of sovereignty of the United States of America, 
>mailed into any county of the U.S.; the county authorities can 
>bring the Council on Foreign Relations, or any member 
>therein, to trial in the county, and any action by any member 
>of the Council on Foreign Relations in the past is 
>admissible as evidence, such as starting World War II, 
>subsidizing the Nazi Government, or subsidizing the USSR.
>	Criminal syndicalism can also be prosecuted
>according to Corpus Juris Secundum 46, Insurrection and 
>Sedition:  sec. 461 c.  "Sabotage and syndicalism aiming to 
>abolish the present political and social system, including 
>direct action or sabotage."  Thus any program of a 
>foundation which seeks to abolish the present political or 
>social system of the United States can be prosecuted.  Of 
>course every foundation program seeks to accomplish just 
>that, and is indictable. 
>	Not only individuals, but any corporation 
>supporting criminal syndicalism can be prosecuted,
>according to Corpus Juris Secundum 46 462b. Criminal
>Syndicalism.  "Statutes against criminal syndicalism apply 
>to corporations as well as to individuals organizing or 
>belonging to criminal syndicalist society; evidence of the 
>character and activities of other organizations with which 
>the organization in which the accused is a member is 
>affiliated is admissible."
>	Not only can the members of the World Order be 
>arrested and tried anywhere, since they function worldwide 
>in their conspiratorial activities to undermine and overthrow 
>all governments and nations, but because their 
>organizations are so tightly interlocked, any evidence about 
>any one of them can be introduced in prosecuting any 
>member of other organizations in any part of the U.S. or the 
>world.  Their attempts to undermine the political and social 
>orders of all peoples make them subject to legal retribution.  
>The People of the U.S. must begin at once to enforce the 
>statutes outlawing criminal syndicalist activities, and bring 
>the criminals to justice.
>Permission to reprint granted by the Committee to Restore 
>the Constitution.  Mr. Eustace Mullins, Council Member of
>Committee to Restore the Constitution, may be contacted 
>at Bankers Research Institute, P.O. Box 1105, Staunton, VA  
>Other books by Mr. Mullins include: 
>Secrets of the Federal Reserve
>My Life in Christ
>This Difficult Individual, Ezra Pound
>A Writ for Martyrs
>The Curse of Canaan
>Murder by Injection

Paul Andrew Mitchell                 : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA;  M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine

tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com   : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this

As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail