Time: Fri Oct 03 08:24:20 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA17294;
Fri, 3 Oct 1997 08:11:37 -0700 (MST)
by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA01303;
Fri, 3 Oct 1997 08:10:53 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1997 08:10:21 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: ???????????? IRS ???????????? (fwd)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Caveat Lector.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
>From: ABeliever@aol.com
>Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 10:37:14 -0400 (EDT)
>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>Subject: ???????????? IRS ????????????
>
>
>---------------------
>Forwarded message:
>From: liberty@sportsmen.net
>To: abeliever@aol.com
>Date: 97-10-03 03:34:26 EDT
>
>================[ Distributed Message ]================
> ListServer: liberty (Liberty Watch Listserver)
> Type: Not Moderated
> Distributed on: 03-OCT-97, 00:14:32 MST
>Original Written by: IN:t42usc@Juno.com.
>=======================================================
>
>
>
>Subject: Re: Reposting by request. First post ran off the window.
>Message-ID: <19971001.115905.3294.0.T42USC@juno.com>
>
>From: t42usc@juno.com (Eldee Connection)
>
>
>>From David Myrland:
>
>If you are looking at a Form 1040, and you are not one mentioned in 26
>USC 31(a) as eligible for credits thereunder, you are looking at the
>wrong form!
>
>EVERY Form 1040 prescribes that "[Enter your Federal Withholding on this
>line.]" And goes on to instruct "[Enter the amount of tax indicated a
>proper]" and then "[If line X is bigger than line Y, substract line Y
>from line X, and this is the amount of refund.]" Sorry, I have thrown
>away all form I collected when I discovered 26 USC 83 and saw that it
>protects Labor as a cost.
>
>What you have above is a prescription that "The tax withheld at the
>source on wages shall be allowed as a credit to the recipient of the
>income against the tax imposed by this subtitle." (See 26 USC 31(a))
>
>Every employee in the country (who files) performs this accounting, but
>only "Officers, employees, or elected officials of the Untied States, a
>State, political subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality of
>any one or more of the foregoing, and employees of certain foreign
>corporations" are eligible. (See 26 CFR 1.31-2(b))
>
>Because:
>Every Form 1040 prescribes that one enter Fed. W/holding on the form, and
>
>One must follow the language and instruction on the form (it's going to
>be signed under penalties of perjury, 26 USC 6065), and
>
>Because you are not listed as eligible for a credit of your Fed.
>W/holding against your chapter one liability, even if your liability is
>ZERO, you can't file the form without committing a crime! (claiming a
>credit for which you are ineligible)(See 18 USC 1001)
>
>Now, unless you are a government employee, as defined in 26 CFR
>1.31-2(b), you are looking at the wrong form when viewing any Form 1040.
>
>This is briefed, explained, and in three years of litigating it, it
>remains undenied by the IRS, in over 10 cases I've written.
>
>Find below, ONLY my catalog of materials and introduction to Citizens
>Litigating Against Abuse of Power (C.L.A.A.P.) which is devoted to
>teaching offensive strategies for use against any public servant that
>takes out his or her pen.
>
>You wrote:
>>> ARE YOU REQUIRED?
>>> (The fewest words ever written on the subject relative to income
>>> taxes)
>>> by Willem van Mastrigt
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>> How to volunteer to be a taxpayer
>>>
>>> Form 1040. Line 7 INCOME (Wages, Tips, etc.) The instruction is to
>>> enter the amount of wages appearing on Form W-2 or 1099 on this
>>line.
>>> But there is another instruction much overlooked. It is the
>>> struction on Line 7 itself. Notice two fields, INCOME and (Wages,
>>> Tips, etc.) It is only dependent on into which field the entry is
>>> made that decides whether one volunteers to be a taxpayer or not.
>>> o volunteer taxpayer status, the entry on Line 7 is made in the
>>> INCOME field, i.e., without parenthesis.
>>
>> I don't get this one. I took a look at a 1996 1040A that is in the
>>book
>>the IRS so gracefully sent me. (sorry, I didn't use it) I didn't see
>>anywhere to make a separate entry for anything on line 7. I also
>>looked
>>at some old 1040's and didn't see anything as described either.
>> Am I just looking at the wrong form?
>>
>>************************************************************************
>>Dan Smith
>>
>
>
>IF YOU HAVE SEEN MY CATALOG, delete the following.
>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
>XXXXxx
>-Code Breaker Catalog of Materials-
>from David Myrland
>Available publications and documents:
>Order form follows this catalog.
>This catalog expires February 1, 1998-send for one if you don’t get yours
>in January.
>*Below, #5 and 6 are new additions to the product line.
>"Our Uncle, Our Problem" is a book about the past three years of
>litigation of certain statutory issues that clearly spell the end of the
>IRS, as argued and briefed by David Myrland for his clients: $30.00
>Can we have your E-Mail address? Send to "T42USC@juno.com"
>We cannot count of U.S. Post, add $3.00 for U.P.S. shipping:
>1. Code Breaker; The Section 83 Equation, a technical legal manual that
>devotes 70 pages to the outline of the operation of 26 USC 83 and the
>axioms of income taxation that support it. This is a full explanation of
>how the Tax Code has always protected the Laborer from taxation when all
>he or she receives is the value of the services performed. $30.00
>
>2. This Supreme Court brief sets forth the most protective issues as
>they’ve been going through the judicial process. It comes with a
>photocopy of all relevant provisions with research guide and financial
>statement in lieu of tax returns w/instructions on how the section 83
>deduction is claimed. The IRS has not objected in the Supreme Court. The
>Government waived its right to respond 9/18/96, and three times since;
>$35.00
>
>3. State Small Claims brief and complaint intended to get answers from
>state revenue departments about section 83 (personal property), or, in
>the alternative, money damages for unlawful detention and conversion of
>such property. Comes with a copy of three cases holding that one cannot
>be forced into association. South Carolina format; $30.00
>
>4. Challenges to mandatory auto insurance, license tabs, and driver’s
>license based upon constitutional issues. Comes with motion to dismiss
>with brief in support, as well as the appeals package of the same brief
>and objections. Washington State format; $30.00
>
>5. 4 USC 72 requires that any Federal Office have permission to operate
>outside of D.C., and the Sec. of Treas. (IRS) cannot talk about it. This
>was only issue (A) out of issues A-Q in David Myrland’s ch.13 bankruptcy
>brief. While avoiding Tax Court’s penalties for raising issues at law,
>David proved that even bankruptcy court is derelict. This brief is the
>biggest nightmare ever filed that uses only the Tax Code for defense
>(Includes Exhibits-100+ pages); $50.00
>
>6. Government publication: "A Citizen’s Guide on Using the Freedom of
>Information Act and the Privacy Act of 1974 to Request Government
>Records." For government work, this booklet is truly packed with common
>sense request strategies. It includes several examples of how to word a
>request, an appeal, and more; $20.00
>
>7. "I work for a private employer on government projects, and the Dept.
>of Defense wants to suspend my security clearance for not filing tax
>returns." This brief with exhibits attacks willfulness, filing
>requirements, and the free labor claim; this is a nightmare for an
>administrative D.O.D. judge! $35.00
>
>8. Transcript from Department of Defense hearing for the revocation of a
>security clearance held by private employee to work on government
>projects; expert witness, David Myrland. $25.00
>
>9. David Myrland has appeared several times as an expert witness in
>trials involving tax controversies. In deposition for a state failure to
>file trial (Utah), David explained in great detail the § 83 equation (1.5
>hrs.).. Text of deposition is available for $35.00.
>
>10. Two executive orders outlining the requirements and guidelines for
>protecting classified information in private industry, filed by the
>government (Dept. of Defense) in tribunal to revoke security clearance of
>private worker. $25.00
>
>Professional opinions:
>11. United States passport applications are issued only to those who are
>willing to supply their Social Security number; you are not required!
>This notarized letter of 7 pages is addressed to you personally and sets
>forth the regulatory requirements for disclosure and how they impose NO
>SUCH DUTY (photo copy of applicable provisions included).. $35.00
>
>
>
>12. Professional opinion explaining the same Social Security issues in
>issue (A) of the Supreme Court brief (#2 above), worded as opinion, this
>signed and personalized letter sets forth the U.S. possession citizenship
>controversy for the person desiring information about the SS tax. $35.00
>
>Other :
>13. Written workshop for judges detailing how to treat pro se litigants,
>presented by the Honorable Allen Sharp, Gerald B. Cohn, and Dean Ivan E.
>Bodensteiner. Written by judges for judges on the seventh circuit. $25.00
>
>14. "Filing a Complaint on your Own Behalf" is a booklet available at
>Federal District Court which explains the basics of how to commence your
>case, what paperwork is necessary, and what the deadlines are.$15.00
>
>15. "For these nine reasons, my wife and I don’t have to comply with
>that IRS summons." In this 45 page order, Federal District Court Chief
>Judge Voorhees explains away the nonresident alien argument, delegation
>of authority, OMB#, and others. $20.00
>
>16. Two treaties that actually read better than the Bill of Rights,
>entered into by the U.S. and other countries in the thirties and forties.
>$10.00
>
>*Use the order form that follows this catalog. To expedite shipping,
>Postal Money Orders are preferred. Please allow three weeks for delivery.
>Because of U.S. Post unreliability, we must now ask for $3.00 for U.P.S.
>shipping!
>
>Photo copy this form and submit it with your order.
>-Code Breaker Materials Order Form-
>
>Please find enclosed my personal check or postal money order for $_______
>+ $3.00 shipping as payment for the items circled below:
>(circle)
> "Our Uncle, Our Problem" is the best Tax Law primer: $30.00
>1. "Code Breaker; The § 83 Equation": $30.00
>2. Supreme Court brief-8 issues: $35.00
>3. State income tax small claims brief w/case law: $30.00
>
>4. Traffic court challenges w/appeal: $30.00
>5. David Myrland’s own tax brief; $50.00
>6. Guide to Using the FOIA/Privacy Act(s); $20.00
> Add $3.00 for U.P.S. shipping
>7. Security clearance brief:: $35.00
>8. Transcript from #7 above: $25.00
>9. Deposition transcript-Utah criminal trial: $35.00
>10. Two executive orders, protect classified info: $25.00
> (E-Mail Address; "T42USC@juno.com")
>11. No SS# on passport application: $35.00
>
>12. SS tax does not apply to me: $35.00
>13. Workshop for judges-pro se litigation: $25.00
>14. Filing a complaint on your own behalf : $15.00
>15. Chief Judge’s Order to comply with IRS summons: $20.00
>16. Two international treaties that echo Bill of Rights: $10.00
>
>*Items 1-4, and 7-9 will be bound with durable covers. Items 1-5, 7, 11
>and 12
>written by David Myrland-All Rights Reserved.
>
>Please send all orders payable to:
>My address is:
>Robert Victor, Bender
>c/o 1175 NW Gilman Blvd. Suite # 123
>Issaquah, Washington state 98027
>Without Prejudice
>
>Citizens Litigating Against Abuse of Power…
>(C.L.A.A.P. c/o1175 NW Gilman Blvd. #123, Issaquah, Washington state
>[98027])
> …Is proud to announce the forming of its first Chapter in
>Seattle, Washington, and the appointment of its Chairman, Robert Victor,
>Bender. Another Chapter is now forming in Portland, and C.L.A.A.P. is
>very pleased to have Mr. Eugene Dayton, Pringle in charge there!
> C.L.A.A.P. is devoted to rectifying the everyday abuses of the
>Public by its servants en mass by educating the average Citizen in root
>level concepts and strategies, and providing consultation for the
>formulation and prosecution of civil actions commenced against public
>employees.
> C.L.A.A.P. is comprised of People who truly understand and can
>appreciate the growing encroachment that the government(s) poses to our
>Fundamental Liberties, and who are serious about getting involved to help
>the most defenseless Citizens; Joe and Jane Lunchbucket, you and me. The
>tools placed at your disposal when you join are so unique, so simple, and
>so very much an offense (you are the Plaintiff!), that you and your
>fellow community conscious minded Americans will compete for the fastest
>times getting to court against a traffic ticket (by filing a lawsuit).
> Did you know that in the average traffic stop for no license
>plates, expired tabs, no driver’s license or insurance, there are over
>seven grounds for small claims actions? Did you know that small claims
>awards go as high as $10k in some states? If the police can’t prove the
>Supreme Court wrong about the Right to Travel freely, do you think they
>can answer the questions when you sue them for the answers?
> This strategy has already fowled up one county policeman’s
>vacation and his wife’s satisfaction gained from dating a government
>employee, and another policeman and his chief turned over the pictures
>they took in a bogus search, and yet another man got his car back from a
>tow company after police impounded it.
> On June 23, 1997, the King County Police Department and "Master
>Police Officer" GARY L. ZORNES (as heralded in local press for busting
>drinking teens on grad nite) missed the small claims deadline to define
>the term "Constitutionalist" after having called a C.L.A.A.P. member that
>in paperwork, and after having threatened the Citizen that he’d "…empty
>this can of mace on you if you don’t shut up!" Yeah? Well, Mr. ZORNES,
>now your name is in all CAPS!!!
> C.L.A.A.P. members will be known by all through window stickers
>that prove membership, civil suits commenced, and confirmed kills in any
>court, including small claims. An approaching law enforcement officer
>will have full notice of your willingness and real ability to at least
>sue in small claims, if you can’t file a cross complaint under your
>traffic ticket; this is offense!
> C.L.A.A.P. members join by purchasing the Small Claims Video and
>package of actual small claims suits with affidavits, exhibits, and
>complaint containing the legal arguments. Anyone who has studied the
>Right to Travel or who is part of a group of students can immediately
>initiate an offensive program in their own town, county, or State. Upon
>commencement of their first case in small claims, the member gets a
>window sticker that displays their intent to on lookers. Other emblems
>signify successful cases where the Citizen (Justice) prevailed.
> C.L.A.A.P. members will have access to Notarized and personalized
>legal opinions pertaining to certain situations that are simply
>unavoidable and which are used most often by the Liberty police to harass
>and to annoy. Supreme Court decisions say that one cannot be penalized if
>they relied upon expert opinion to guide their actions (a reliance and
>defense for traffic stops).
> C.L.A.A.P. members will have the knowledge to formulate the right
>questions to ask, and which public servant to sue for the answers. This
>approach does not only apply to the Right to Travel! If natural persons
>and individuals were not mentioned in the definition of the term "person"
>for the purposes of property taxes, wouldn’t you sue for an answer? If
>animal control cited you for not licensing your dog, if the school
>
><<< Continued to next message >>>
>
>
>========================================================================
>To subscribe: send a message to Liberty@sportsmen.net
>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
> email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net
>For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net
>
>========================================================================
>via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net
>
>
>
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail