Time: Fri Oct 03 13:30:49 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA18991; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 13:30:43 -0700 (MST) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA03435; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 13:29:22 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1997 13:28:50 -0700 To: Jonas Squire <js1858@lab3.ca.boeing.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Title 26 Applicablity in Federal territories governed by Provisional Govt's (fwd) Jonas, Please read Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF in the Supreme Law Library ("SLL"), and then read our excerpt from Dyett v. Turner which is now the NINTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE in the case of USA v. Knudson in SLL. The Southern states were restored to full and lawful membership in the Union, and the proof is in Dyett v. Turner. You and I could have a very lively debate, based upon the supposition that the moon is composed of green cheese, but I prefer not to do so. :) /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School At 12:57 PM 10/3/97 PDT, you wrote: >Hi Paul- > >As ever, I can not praise you enough for you work. Now, the meat of my >e-mail. > >Robert Wangrud has a web page 'Direct Simple and Incapable of Being >Mis-understood', dealing with the seccesion of the southern states, >the consequent dissolvement of the Congress sine die, and the follow-on >declaration by Lincoln of an emergency, civil war, etc, etc. Now, if >this emergency was never effectively concluded as asserted by Mr. Wangrud, >AND all states made a state by proclamation of the president or congress since >then are technically NOT states, and that the sitting governments in each of >those states is technically a provisional government of a federal territory, >by virtue of the Articles of War issued by Lincoln, THEN - does Title 26 >apply to inhabitants of those areas (Washington, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, >South Dakota, Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, >Nevada and West Virgina)? by virtue of their subjegation to federal law? > >And if Title 26 DOES apply to inhabitants of those areas, then obviously, >the argument that Title 26 does not apply to sovereign states would not hold >in those areas, because they were never sovereign states and not admitted >to the Union per constituional process requirements. > >Just some superious thoughts... > >Keep up the effort. > >Sincerely, > >/s/ Jonas Squire > > =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail