Time: Mon Oct 13 04:12:53 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA23575;
	Mon, 13 Oct 1997 04:12:47 -0700 (MST)
	by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA15332;
	Mon, 13 Oct 1997 04:12:32 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 04:11:46 -0700
To: MSmith6791@aol.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Unlawfulness of IRS Defined - to Paul Mitchell

Meador and I collaborated by submitting
one of his documents in the form of an
Affidavit In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on
New Life Health Center Company.  I believe
that pleading is entitled "6. 62186 NOTICE OF

The MISCELLANEOUS EXHIBIT was Meador's statement, 
which I had transcribed into the record, one day 
before Dan's signed Affidavit arrived (late).  
Then, I took his updates and submitted a revised 
statement, to keep everything as clerically perfect 
as possible.

See In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on 
New Life Health Center Company, in the
Supreme Law Library, at the URL just below
my name here.

The judge panicked when he saw research
in such depth.  See the Complaint of
Judicial Misconduct which is also published
along with the rest of the pleadings and
related documents in that case.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

At 01:55 AM 10/13/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Did you originally post this?  There's much more to it
>Michael Smith
>Forwarded message:
>Subj:    Fwd:  SNET: Unlawfulness of IRS Defined - to PMitchell
>Date:    97-10-12 16:54:53 EDT
>From:    A Believer
>To:      MSmith6791
>Forwarded message:
>From:	dude@deepwell.com (Psyberdude)
>Reply-to:	snetnews@world.std.com
>To:	snetnews@world.std.com
>Date: 97-10-11 19:09:13 EDT
>->  SearchNet's   SNETNEWS   Mailing List
>Memorandum on IRS by Dan
>for full text see: http://idt.net/~tmccrory/IRSMEMO.HTM
>1. IRS
>Identity & Principal of Interest
>In 1953, the Internal Revenue Service
>was created by the stroke of a pen
>when the Secretary of the Treasury
>changed the name of the Bureau of
>Internal Revenue (T.O. No. 150-29, G.M.
>Humphrey, Secretary of the
>Treasury, July 9, 1953). However, no
>congressional or presidential
>authorization for making this change has been
>located, so the source of
>authority had to originate elsewhere. Research to
>which IRS officials have
>acquiesced suggests that the Secretary exercised
>his authority as trustee
>of Puerto Rico Trust #62 (Internal Revenue) (see 31
>USC (1321), and as will
>be demonstrated, the Secretary does, in fact,
>operate as Secretary of the
>Treasury, Puerto Rico. 
>The solid link
>between the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of
>the Treasury.
>Puerto Rico, was first published in the September 1995 issue
>of Veritas,
>based on research by William Cooper and Wayne Bentson, both of
>Arizona. In
>October, a criminal complaint was filed in the office of W A.
>Edmondson, attorney general for Oklahoma against an Enid-based
>officer, and in the time since, IRS principals have failed to refute
>allegation that IRS is an agency of the Department of Treasury,
>Rico. In November, criminal complaints were filed simultaneously with
>grand jury for the United States district court for the District
>Northern Oklahoma, Tulsa, and the office of Attorney General Edmondson,
>both the office of the United States Attorney and IRS principals have
>to rebut the allegations in that instance (United States of America
>Kenney F. Moore. et al, 95 CR-129C). 
>By consulting the index for
>Chapter 3, Title 31 of the United States Code,
>one finds that IRS and the
>Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms are not
>listed as agencies of the
>United States Department of the Treasury. The
>fact that Congress never
>created a "Bureau of Internal Revenue" is
>confirmed by publication in the
>Federal Register at 36 F.R. 849- 890 [C.B.
>1971 - 1,698], 36 F.R. 11946
>[C.B.1971-2,577], and 37 F.R. 489-490; and in
>Internal Revenue Manual 1100
>at 1111.2. 
>Implications are condemning both to IRS and third parties
>who knowingly
>participate in IRS-initiated scams: No legitimate authority
>resides in or
>emanates from an office which was not legitimately created
>and/or ordained
>either by state or national constitutions or by legislative
>enactment. See
>variously, United States v. Germane, 99 U.S. 508 (1879),
>Norton v. SheIby
>County, 118 U.S. 425, 441. 6 S.Ct. 1121 (1866), etc.,
>dating to Pope v.
>Commissioner, 138 F.2d 1006, 1009 (6th Cir. 1943); where
>the state is
>concerned the most recent corresponding decision was State v.
>Pinckney, 276
>N.W.2d 433, 436 (Iowa 1979).
>Just Say
>Just Say Know
>-> Send
>"subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>->  Posted by: Psyberdude

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail