Time: Tue Oct 14 19:58:27 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA27608
for [address in tool bar]; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 19:58:28 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 19:20:30 -0700
To: faces@webtv.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: two Superior Courts
Cc: supremelaw@ibm.net, pmitch@primenet.com
Connie,
Here is a brief excerpt from a pleading
which I wrote for the Superior Court of
the State of Arizona. If you need more
background on the distinction discussed
here, please let me know via email.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
STRIKE MOTION PETITIONS THE WRONG COURT
The instant case #315580 was first filed and now proceeds in
the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County
of Pima. The STRIKE MOTION, on the other hand, petitions the
Superior Court of Arizona, Pima County. These respective courts
are not one and the same. See 31 CFR 51.2 and 52.2; Form II(b),
WARRANT FOR ARREST (SUPERIOR COURT) SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA,
________ County [sic], and Form XXIII, NOTICE OF RIGHTS OF REVIEW
AFTER CONVICTION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN
AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ________ [sic], in Arizona Rules of Court,
State and Federal, West Publishing Company (1994).
The Superior Court of the State of Arizona is a de facto
forum convened pursuant to federal municipal law, proceeding
under the presumption that Arizona is a federal territory, not a
Union state. This presumption is enforceable upon the population
of citizens of the United States ("federal citizens") who reside
within the geographic boundaries of Arizona state, because they
are subject to federal municipal law.
The Superior Court of Arizona is a de jure forum convened
pursuant to Arizona organic law, proceeding under the Tenth
Amendment and under other notable provisions of the supreme Law,
which admitted Arizona into the Union of several states which are
united by and under the Constitution for the United States of
America, as lawfully amended ("U.S. Constitution").
To the extent that the STRIKE MOTION requests relief of the
wrong forum, it is once again out of order and, moreover, fails
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Accordingly,
the STRIKE MOTION should be denied, or tabled for future
consideration and possibly also future amendment by Plaintiffs,
to correct these and other serious errors.
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail