Time: Wed Oct 15 12:27:15 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA06413; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 12:25:14 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 15:24:53 -0400 Originator: heritage-l@gate.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] To: pmitch@primenet.com Subject: SLS: People v. De la Guerra FYI: Pablo De La Guerra was a respected California judge, who signed the 1849 California state Constitution. There is no 14th amendment [sic], allegedly ratified in 1868. America should stop deceiving itself, once and for all, on this point. For unrebutted historical details, read Dyett v. Turner, now excerpted in the NINTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE, in USA v. Knudson, now in the Supreme Law Library, at the URL just below my name here: Assumes facts not in evidence. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com Here is a pertinent excerpt from People v. De La Guerra: "Their position [federal citizens] partakes more of the character of subjects than of citizens", to wit: I have no doubt that those born in the Territories, or in the District of Columbia, are so far citizens as to entitle them to the protection guaranteed to citizens of the United States** in the Constitution, and to the shield of nationality abroad; but it is evident that they have not the political rights which are vested in citizens of the States. They are not constituents of any community in which is vested any sovereign power of government. Their position partakes more of the character of subjects than of <---!!! citizens. They are subject to the laws of the United States**, but have no voice in its management. If they are allowed to make laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the sanction of a Government in which they are not represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the political rights of citizens they cannot enjoy until they are organized into a State, and admitted into the Union. [People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 342 (1870] [emphasis added] At 11:18 PM 10/14/97 -0400, you wrote: > Judge Pablo de la Guerra has made >an immensely important contribution to these constructions, >as civil defendant in People v. de la Guerra. > >Said term means "Citizen of ONE OF the States United." > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >http://supremelaw.com > >copy: Supreme Law School > > > >Robert Wangrud >Paul Mitchell repeatedly cites the case of "people v. De La Guerra" What I >find in this case is much more than Mr. Mitchell reports. Here's the case >as Mitchell reports it: > <snip> =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail