Time: Wed Oct 15 14:09:46 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA03598;
	Wed, 15 Oct 1997 14:10:24 -0700 (MST)
	by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA24868;
	Wed, 15 Oct 1997 14:07:04 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 14:06:13 -0700
To: rschmidt@pierian.com (Rod Schmidt)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: People v. De La Guerra

The 14th amendment was never ratified,
so it is moot to be discussing it as Law
any longer.  The pertinent cases 
constructed Section 1 to imply only
two classes of citizenship, however,
on the presumption it was properly ratified.

It is clear that Section 1 was referring
to federal citizens who inhabited one
of the several states of the Union,
not a corporate State within the federal zone, 
although their state Citizenship was
to be considered subordinate and derivative.

For unrebutted historical facts proving
it was never ratified, reads the Defendant's
NOTICE in USA v. Knudson, now loaded in the
Supreme Law Library at the URL just below my
name here:

/s/ Paul Mitchell

copy:  Supreme Law School

At 01:52 PM 10/15/97 -0700, you wrote:
>>Do you have
>>a major university law library near you?
>Yes, Lewis and Clark.
>>In other words, a state must join the Union
>>before its Citizens can be considered a
>>sovereign body;
>You mean, it must draft and ratify a Constitution?
>>before then, those [federal]
>>citizens are subjects of Congress.  I do not
>>believe that this is an oversimplification, in any
>>way, given that there are two (2) and only two
>>classes of citizenship (NOT one (1), NOT three (3)).
>I suspect that there may be three. The 14th Amendment says that its persons
>are citizens of the United States AND OF THE STATE IN WHICH THEY RESIDE.
>What "state" is this referring to? Some kind of federal entitiy, maybe?
>Could it be that the 14th created not one new kind of citizenship, but two?

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail