Time: Fri Oct 17 04:52:24 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA16061
for [address in tool bar]; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 04:42:18 -0700 (MST)
Delivered-To: liberty-and-justice-outgoing@majordomo.pobox.com
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 04:43:06 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: L&J: Jack McLamb, law enforcement activist
There are many active people, both inside
and outside of government, who have a motive
to defame Jack McLamb. Jack is one of the
few people who is candid enough to admit
that the FBI are aiding and abetting a child
kidnap racket, which is sweeping minors off
inner city streets, and bringing them across
state lines, to be put into "service" as
pimps, prostitutes, drug runners, and worse.
You will note that Japan has just changed their
laws to encourage faster organ transplants.
This kidnap matter was brought to the attention
of a former Libertarian Candidate for Vice
President, who agreed to brief Jack on the
matter. After seeing all the evidence I
put forward about two distinct classes of
federal courts, the ex-Candidate walked away
and "politely" encouraged me to make lots
of money -- doing FOIA requests for people. (?)
It was a left-handed insult; I had an eyewitness,
who later agreed. That same ex-Candidate urged me
to stay away from the New Life Health Center case
-- "too risky" was her assessment.
Some of the kidnapped kids are being murdered
to harvest their live organs. Perhaps we could all
ask some of the Roby activists exactly what they do
know about the many missing children. Roby is
a great opportunity for those who are under cover
to impugn Jack McLamb: something about "grabbing
the megaphone from his hands" (or words to that effect).
For proof, confer in "The Franklin Coverup."
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
At 01:26 AM 10/17/97 EDT, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>Some of your criticisms are very valid. Some are based on opinion. But
>I ask you to read this carefully.
>
>We need to appeal to American society, and in order to do that we need
>someone we can trot in front of the cameras and portray the
>patriots/militias in a postive light.
>Right now, McLamb, and Gritts probably have the highest name recognition,
>but the average american either has no idea of who these people are and
>what they stand for, or they they have preconcieved notions.
>
>I don't think we can do any good debasing what we believe in, but we will
>certainly lose a lot if we allow the media full control of information.
>But getting Gritts and McLamb involved in an effort to polish the images
>of the patriots and militias is one small step in the right direction.
>
>All or nothing attitudes usually result in that person seeing nothing. I
>would much prefer Gritts, or McLamb trying to resolve this instead of
>Slam Donaldson, Dan Blather, or Jesse Jackson.
>
>Your distrust of McLamb is noted, and justifiable, but from what I
>understand of him, he is honorable and in a case such as Shirley Allens,
>I don't think he would roll over and simply hand her over to the locals.
>Unfortunately sometimes we need to trust people we do not like.
>
>John.
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: goshawk3@juno.com (John W McPherson)
>
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail