Time: Fri Oct 17 07:30:31 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA19803;
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 07:28:14 -0700 (MST)
id KAA24621; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 10:24:46 -0400 (EDT)
id KAA24590; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 10:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
id AA15729; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 10:24:40 -0400
by smtp04.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA23079
for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 07:24:40 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpd023075; Fri Oct 17 07:24:37 1997
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 07:25:37 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: Jack McLamb, law enforcement activist
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
I would choose to call Jack, and ask
him directly what it was that he said
in Roby. His answer would mean a whole
lot more to me, than the entire lot of
arm-chair quarterbacks I read here.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 06:05 AM 10/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>
>
>
>> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>> To: snetnews@world.std.com
>> Subject: SNET: Jack McLamb, law enforcement activist
>> Date: Friday, October 17, 1997 3:34 AM
>>
>>
>> -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>>
>> There are many active people, both inside
>> and outside of government, who have a motive
>> to defame Jack McLamb. Jack is one of the
>> few people who is candid enough to admit
>> that the FBI are aiding and abetting a child
>> kidnap racket, which is sweeping minors off
>> inner city streets, and bringing them across
>> state lines, to be put into "service" as
>> pimps, prostitutes, drug runners, and worse.
>> You will note that Japan has just changed their
>> laws to encourage faster organ transplants.
>>
>> This kidnap matter was brought to the attention
>> of a former Libertarian Candidate for Vice
>> President, who agreed to brief Jack on the
>> matter. After seeing all the evidence I
>> put forward about two distinct classes of
>> federal courts, the ex-Candidate walked away
>> and "politely" encouraged me to make lots
>> of money -- doing FOIA requests for people. (?)
>> It was a left-handed insult; I had an eyewitness,
>> who later agreed. That same ex-Candidate urged me
>> to stay away from the New Life Health Center case
>> -- "too risky" was her assessment.
>>
>> Some of the kidnapped kids are being murdered
>> to harvest their live organs. Perhaps we could all
>> ask some of the Roby activists exactly what they do
>> know about the many missing children. Roby is
>> a great opportunity for those who are under cover
>> to impugn Jack McLamb: something about "grabbing
>> the megaphone from his hands" (or words to that effect).
>> For proof, confer in "The Franklin Coverup."
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://supremelaw.com
>
>Paul, I see things a bit differently. There are two broad classes of
>events. One is the large diffuse type of event such as the "harvesting" of
>body parts for sale to the rich who are sick and need a transplant. This
>turns out to be an exercise in public and social morality. The need is not
>to try to save little Johnny Jones who is about to be dissected in order to
>"liberate" a number of his body parts, the need is to stop the traffic of
>body parts per se, be they from young children, or prisoners, or whomever.
>That's difficult to do. The first step is to inform the broad public. In
>many cases the American mass media will NOT help to inform the public. In
>some cases they will, but only if such cooperation fits into their own
>agenda and goals. They pick and choose very carefully, you may be sure. The
>second step is to inform the public all over again because the American
>public has a very short memory span. There are many of these morally
>horrible large diffuse types of events and they are used by a class of
>clever people to establish themselves as leaders of public morality. This
>is a fairly safe way of being a 'good guy' because no **specific action**
>is required, only talk.
>
>The second type of morally bad situation is where the event is localized
>and specific heroic action is needed to change it. For example, Shirley
>Allen. Here is where the 'good guys' described in the above paragraph fall
>down completely. For example, McLamb, the ex-cop. Mr. McLamb suddenly
>confronted **himself** the other day in Roby, Illinois, and discovered just
>who he is. He is not a law enforcement 'activist,' he is morality
>speach-maker. He specifically chooses large diffuse issues because activism
>is NOT possible. In a situation where activism IS called for he suddenly
>becomes a cop... you will obey, spread your legs, stand over there, we're
>taking you in, etc. Thus, he will stand on the side of law and order even
>when law and order has become tyrannical and dangerous.
>
>Friends, it should be crystal clear that the Roby police and the Illinois
>State Police don't give a damn about the safety or health or future of
>Shirley Allen. What DO they care about? Maintaining their own self-image.
>Maintaining their own self-image AT ALL COSTS. And 'all costs' includes
>very definitely the life of Shirley Allen. The solution they secretly
>desire is for Shirley to commit suicide. Voila! Perfect proof of mental
>instability... according to the mentality of police everywhere. Case
>closed, all the patriots go home, McLamb (a valuable police 'asset')
>vindicated, etc.
>
>The only person so far as I have heard to have DONE something is Shirley
>Boucher (sp?) who set off on foot to get to Shirley Allen's house. She was
>**her own leader**. I understand that some 200 people were ready to march
>to Shirley Allen's house but awaited only the word from a leader... Mr.
>McLamb, I understand. Obviously that didn't work out for reasons already
>given above.
>
>The meeting of concerned citizens at Springfield should never have
>occurred. Shirley Allen is not at Springfield. She is at Roby. So what to
>do now? Meet at Roby, of course. But Roby isn't really a place. So, treat
>it as a cyberspace place, a place in the mind. What is really needed is a
>TIME, not a PLACE. Concerned citizens would like to march towards Shirley
>Allen's house simultaneously rather then spporadically. Good idea.
>
>Here is a number. 2:41 Note that I didn't say 2:41PM or 2:41AM, nor did I
>mention that a certain other number like 10 or 51 or 1:37 was to be added
>to that number of 2:41 or subtracted from it. If I gave an exact number
>then in the next five minutes the Illionois State Police would have it and
>plan a little welcoming reception for you.
>
>So it winds out that each person is his or her own leader, that they
>communicate with each other (telephone, cell phone, citizen band radio,
>etc.) so that they have some chance of moving toward Shirley's house all
>together.
>
>That is what activism is all about. H. Ayre.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: "Henry Ayre" <henri@Alaska.NET>
>
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail