Time: Mon Oct 20 04:09:51 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA16983;
Mon, 20 Oct 1997 04:08:43 -0700 (MST)
id HAA26480; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 07:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
id HAA26427; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 07:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
id AA25310; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 07:06:18 -0400
by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA24584;
Mon, 20 Oct 1997 04:02:16 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 04:03:16 -0700
To: c-news@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: USA: Why the global warming scare is hard to believe
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
Objection.
There is a matter which bears close scientific
scrutiny, and testing. This is the Hamaker Hypothesis.
Very simply, the forests eventually leach the soil of
all available minerals, causing the trees to die off,
releasing gigatons of carbon back into the atmosphere.
Higher concentrations of carbon dioxide trap more heat
in the atmosphere, but the heating differential is
not uniform. It is, rather, more pronounced at the
equatorial latitudes, where the sun's rays are closer
to vertical, than at the poles, where the sun's rays
are more horizontal. The heat differential at the
equator results in lofting huge quantities of water
from the ocean, into the atmosphere, where the vapor
travels on high-altitude convection currents to the
nearest pole. En route, the vapor precipitates out
as rain, then ice, and finally snow, the closer to
the poles it gets. As this Hadley Cell increases
in intensity, the weight of the planet shifts from
the equator, to the poles, exerting a crushing action
on the planet, as if the two poles were set in a bench
vise. This shift in weight distribution forces the
tectonic plates to adjust, resulting in more violent
earthquakes and volcanoes, as interior volcanic pressures
escape through the ruptures between plates. The entire
process comes to a standstill as the oceans are transported
to the poles, where they grow into huge glaciers, at the
onset of a 90,000-year period of glaciation that reaches
far below the Canadian border. This hypothesis is worthy
of testing, because it is, indeed, a workable hypothesis.
A small-scale test can be done by mineralizing the soil
with rock dust, and by measuring the effects, if any, on
plant life. Rock dust reverses the loss of minerals in
the soil, regenerating the food chain in the soil, and
upwards into living tissue, like trees, which depend
upon healthy soil to thrive. In a word, the Greenhouse
Effect eventually causes an Ice Age to re-occur.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 03:13 AM 10/20/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 23:15:17 -0500
>From: "Jon E. Dougherty" <usafeature@juno.com>
>To: owner-c-news@world.std.com
>Subject: Oct. 10 column--JD
>
>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>JON E. DOUGHERTY
>USA FEATURES MEDIA CO.
>
>
>WHY THE GLOBAL WARMING SCARE IS HARD TO BELIEVE
>
>
> OCTOBER 10--Columnist Molly Ivins insists everybody knows it is true, so
>there is no reason for further "debate" on the issue of global warming.
>According to the Queen Liberal, scores of scientists from all over the
>world concur that it isn't a matter of when the effects of global warming
>will arrive, but merely a matter of how bad they will be when they come
>to fruition. So the issue is closed, as far as she is concerned.
>
> To defend her position, she resorts to time-tested liberal tactics of
>demonizing her opponents as radical lunatics who refuse to accept the
>truth -- her truth, that is -- and attempting to seize the high moral
>ground. Paraphrasing her words, 'only a selfish idiot believes there is
>no evidence of global warming'. Finally, for good measure, she blames a
>greedy corporate power structure for obfuscating the real truth behind
>global warming for their own selfish, money-grubbing interests. She
>lectures, "It is despicable for these companies to put short-term profits
>ahead of long-term human needs."
>
> True, about 30 different organizations have launched a multi-million
>dollar ad campaign to showcase their version of the global warming truth.
> What is noteworthy about this is not Ms. Ivins' belief that this effort
>by these organizations is indicative of nothing but their own greed.
>Rather, it demonstrates a truth that permeates this and every 'liberal
>vs. conservative' argument. The liberals are virtually exempt from
>having to spend this kind of money to promote their views, because there
>is no shortage of media types like Ivins, public figures like the
>president and vice president, and famous socialists like Ted Turner who
>are only too willing to echo the rehearsed and stock argument decrying
>global warming while they stifle opposition viewpoints at every
>opportunity. Conservatives who wish to make their case are never heard
>from unless they resort to buying media time, which still doesn't stop
>fearful leftists like Mr. Turner from pulling those ads from
>liberal-owned media outlets. Were it not for a handful of conservative
>writers, the opposing and equally legitimate view against global warming
>would not be heard at all.
>
> The facts are thus. Ms. Ivins is correct in asserting that there are
>some scientific studies that claim the possibility global warming may be
>occurring. But what she and her ilk consistently refuse to acknowledge
>is that there is another side to the argument, buttressed by similar
>scientific studies, which basically proclaim that there is no evidence to
>support the first theory. On that note, Ms. Ivins sniffs, any opposing
>information is tainted because all of it was researched by scientists
>who work exclusively for the oil, gas and insurance companies who stand
>to lose billions of a new global warming treaty is passed. The truth is,
>the opposing studies -- which cast doubt on the liberal belief that our
>environment is being consumed by small air conditioning refrigerant leaks
>and hair spray bottles -- were also conducted by scientists who have
>equally admirable credentials and are non-partisan.
>
> This latter factoid is recognized by people like Holly Swanson, a former
>marketing and public relations executive who, after five years of
>research, has written a book which explains the liberal strategy of
>obfuscation and deceit in the whole environmental debate. In it, she
>made dozens of predictions about which direction the environmental debate
>would take in the past few -- and the next few -- years, and over
>twenty-five of those have already come to fruition. Ms. Swanson's
>opinion is important because she has the knowledge necessary to smell a
>'hard sell' from a mile away, and it was this initial public relations
>packaging by the radical environmental left which caught her attention in
>Washington state at an environmental seminar years ago. Her logic is
>sound: If there is irrefutable truth the left wishes to convey, they
>have the means already in place. Why 'package' it for a hard sell?
>Maybe that's because their "evidence" is less than accurate.
>
> "I read some of their material, and it sounded so outlandish I couldn't
>believe it on it's surface," she told me. "So I started looking into it.
> And what I found was that everytime the environmentalists lacked hard
>facts about things like global warming, they had to design a marketing
>campaign to sell the notion to the American people." Not to imply that
>leftist environmentalists are Nazis, Ms. Swanson did say that the tactics
>they employ to deceive the American public are in large part replications
>of tactics Hitler used to persuade naive Germans of a multitude of
>falsehoods.
>
> And it has largely worked. People who are ordinarily very intelligent,
>calculating and discriminate about what they believe have been completely
>co-opted by the liberal mantra over the issue of global warming. They
>have succeeded in making Americans feel guilty for our unprecedented
>wealth and capitalist success, and their answer is to destroy the
>standard of living in this country to satisfy that guilt. And they have
>the nerve to call the opposition selfish. Who are they to decide what
>level of wealth is appropriate for this, or any other, country?
>
> The behavior demonstrated by these radical environmentalists is the
>primary reason why it is so difficult to believe their arguments. They
>are all like the proverbial boy who cried 'wolf'. For decades these
>alarmists have predicted many facets of doom and gloom destined to
>overtake civilization, but none of this has to pass. Worse, they always
>see the United States as the sole villain, as if the US is the only
>industrialized country on the planet. Leftists also forget that because
>of their meddling, US industry is also the most regulated of all the free
>nations in the world, which already costs some $900 billion annually.
>
> The American people are tired of hearing how our world is doomed and
>that it's our fault. If there is such a beast as global warming, the
>left should be as willing as the right to openly discuss all the
>available evidence without lending so much obfuscation to the issue. If
>the left's goal is to convince us they are correct, perhaps they should
>try different tactics other than censorship. People like Molly Ivins and
>Ted Turner are doing their movement more harm than good, because through
>their actions they imply that they are hiding something. ***
>(c) 1997 USA Features Media Co. All rights reserved.
>USA Journal Online. http://www.usajournal.com
>
>
>-------
>To subscribe to c-news, send the message SUBSCRIBE C-NEWS, or the message
>UNSUBSCRIBE C-NEWS to unsubscribe, to majordomo@world.std.com. Contact
>owner-c-news@world.std.com if you have questions.
>
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail