Time: Thu Oct 23 12:56:25 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA20084;
Thu, 23 Oct 1997 12:50:52 -0700 (MST)
by smtp02.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA15672;
Thu, 23 Oct 1997 12:38:29 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpd015631; Thu Oct 23 12:38:10 1997
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 12:39:01 -0700
To: Richard Aaron <amadeus@adnc.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Federal District Court- Error Correction
Hi Richard,
See attached ASCII file, for a successful
rebuttal to IRS Summons enforcement by
a United States District Court.
This file will be loaded into the Supreme
Law Library, just as soon as time and
funds permit.
I can also encode in MIME and Uuencode.
Let me know if you have any problems
read the attached file.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
At 11:46 AM 10/23/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Error Correction: We appologise for using Chief Judge Judith Keep's name,
it should have read Judge Barry T. Moskowitz, Department 15 in the
following letter. Judge Keep (?) was busy admonishing another "Patriot" in
Department 14 for refusing to honor an IRS summons based on PRESUMPTIONS of
the IRS.
>
>- Richard
>
>Dear Friends,
>
>We have a problem with the federal District Courts... you know, Judge
Keep, et al when it comes to having a fair trial or hearing. The present
atmosphere is that common citizens who have challenged the "system" are
routinely denied due process for lack of courtroom experience and in some
cases use "Patriot" rubbish as a defense in arguments. The following is
what happened this past Monday , October 20, 1997... and we need your help,
for we will all suffer if we can't get some fair hearing.
>
>At 11:00 AM, Wade Carter was scheduled to appear in Judge Keep's court to
hear a Title 5 case against the IRS for suppression of FOIA data which
would clearly show they are lying and using false claims against Carter. A
"Bill of Particulars" was a precursor sent to the IRS on this matter. And
Carter was pressing for a summary judgement against the IRS on the matter.
>
>When we arrived at the calendared time of 11:00 AM, we learned that the
case had been removed from the calendar without informing Carter... this in
spite of the 60 day intervening period from the normal 30 day period...
changed by the court clerk on the summons form 30 days to 60 days... to
allow the IRS additional time to get prepared, no doubt. (This conspiracy
and collusion is getting deeper and deeper.)
>
>Then yours truly went over to the clerks office to check the case file and
found that the IRS had filed a motion to dismiss scheduled for hearing on
November 10, 1997 including points and authorities, etc. without informing
Carter of this change. I instructed Carter to get copies of everything in
the file that he didn't have so we could challenge this collective conspiracy.
>
>Now, I'm requesting help from recipients of this letter to assist us in
stopping this charade of injustice by the court in concert with the IRS. If
we can get the courts to perform their duties to the American people, then
we can rid this country of the IRS cancer that is destroying good people.
>
>Will you help?
>
>- Richard
>
>
>
>
Attachment Converted: "I:\ATTACH\OPPOSOS2.ASC"
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13From ???@??? Fri Oct 24 04:07:55 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA16911;
Fri, 24 Oct 1997 03:40:37 -0700 (MST)
by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA16231;
Fri, 24 Oct 1997 03:37:01 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd016214; Fri Oct 24 03:36:55 1997
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 03:37:18 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: COSCO to Get Long Beach Deal (fwd)
>From: "Roger Voss" <rogerv@sttl.uswest.net>
>Subject: Re: SNET: [Fwd: COSCO to Get Long Beach Deal]
>Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 22:05:47 -0700
>
>It's pretty damn suspicious when a certain cadre of prevailing power
>brokers in Congress (and especially the Senate) are so adamant to make this
>deal on behalf of our most serious international enemy (that is certainly
>China's assessment toward the U.S.). The people in Congress against the
>COSCO/Long Beach deal are the ones that still make an attempt to represent
>grassroots constituent interest. The ones pushing for it are the typical
>crowd that always carries the water for the behind-the-scenes globalist
>masters.
>
>Their attitude on this COSCO/Long Beach deal is as adamant as their intent
>was to shove the '94 Crime Bill, NAFTA, and GATT/WTO through Congress no
>matter what. Such hard-core determination to give the tyrant communist Red
>Chinese regime direct port access to our shores, which they would manage as
>their exclusive facility, should thus send up a definite red flag of
>warning to the rest of us.
>
>Giving this port to Red China has to be a significant linchpin in the
>machinations of the globalist cabal given their emphasis on making it
>happen come hell or high water. Is a good bet then, that they have
>something in mind for this port other than just better facilitating
>importation of cheap Chinese-made toys.
>
>We've seen the Clinton administration go out of its way to deliver quid pro
>quo to the communist Chinese in the form of advanced computer technology
>that they can use to dramatically improve their nuclear weapons technology.
>The Clinton administration likewise supports the Long Beach deal. The
>globalist lapdogs in the Congress are pressing hard to make it happen. As
>typical with all globalist agenda items this is spanning across party
>lines. You have elements of both parties that still care about their
>country and are against it. And you have the globalist lapdogs from both
>parties that are for it. And no matter which political party has a majority
>of Congress the globalist cabal always has its lapdogs positioned in the
>leadership positions so that they can ram globalist agenda items through
>when necessary.
>
>So why do the globalist want communist Red China to have the Long Beach
>naval base as an exclusive port? Here are items that come to mind:
>
>1) We're within two years of the year 2000.The year 2000 is an important
>milestone year for the globalist cabal as comes up in their various
>publications.
>
>2) It is believed by many researchers that they want to achieve actual
>world government by this milestone date.
>
>3) Though the decade of the 90s has been earmarked as the decade to end the
>great charade of the West pitted against the Communist East and perform
>final integration of Russian and American societies, the integration hasn't
>been sufficiently thorough enough such that the people of the U.S. would
>willingly enter an actual world government.
>
>4) By and large American culture has been reshaped for appropriate
>integration with world socialist government. Yet even still, if a
>plebiscite were held on whether to ditch national government under the U.S.
>Constitution and integrate as a state under a world federation socialist
>government, probably most Americans would still balk and choose to stay
>with their national government. America needs a final shove to push it over
>the brink. One final catalyst...
>
>5) If you want to brutally police a nation of people and utterly subjugate
>them into courses of action against their will, it would be preferable to
>use foreign national troops that would not hesitate to perform any degree
>of brutality. A policing army composed of people of the subjugated nation
>would be more problematic for it would likely suffer large defections of
>soldiers (including officers) that would instead choose to fight for their
>homeland and their people instead of oppress them on behalf of elitist
>tyrants. The DoD is definitely co-opted at the top echelons but how deep
>down does their traitorous sellout intentions penetrate? That is the risky
>question. For small scale operations the national army would likely
>suffice. To subjugate an entire nation -- well the manpower wouldn't be
>there for one thing just using existing mobilization figures. Factoring in
>some percentage of defection and the notion of using the national army to
>brutally police the nation looks like a pretty shaky scenario.
>
>6) The one resource that communist Red China has more of than any other
>nation in the world is the resource of people -- especially able bodied
>males. (It boasted in the late 1980s that it could field a 200 million man
>army if it activated its reserves.) This is a number of truly Biblical
>proportions. By contrast, in the West a 2, 3, or 4 million man army is
>considered very large.
>
>7) The globalist cabal has something in mind to be staged that will be the
>catalyst which will ultimately drive the U.S. into the embrace of a world
>socialist government on schedule for the year 2000. Preparations are being
>laid right now to facilitate the massive importation of foreign troops that
>will be used to conduct brutal military policing actions against the
>American people -- to force them to submit to a course of action for their
>country (no longer their's) that they would not otherwise go along with.
>
>8) The communist Red Chinese regime is being courted by the globalist cabal
>to fulfill this role of providing a military police manpower pool. Hence
>why the Clinton administration is lavishing tremendous gifts and favors
>upon them.
>
>9) Long Beach is to be established and prepared as a port of entry for this
>communist Chinese military police force.
>
>10) Other bases around the United States have been deactivated for use by
>U.S. troops and are likely being prepared (or at least designated) as
>staging centers for the deployment of a foreign military police force.
>Certainly these bases could be activated and used for that purpose at a
>moments notice. The Chinese soldier is used to Spartan living conditions;
>initially their invasion army won't require these deactivated bases to be
>in plush working order as an active U.S. army base would be.
>
>The final analysis is that this is how the globalist cabal intends to keep
>its schedule.
>
<snip>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail