Time: Tue Nov 04 15:33:27 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA28361
	for [address in tool bar]; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 15:32:19 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 15:32:01 -0700
To: "Gary G. Cox" <coxgg@flash.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: SLF: mail coming to you
Cc: pmitch@primenet.com
References: <>


"SL" means "Supreme Law"  
"SLF" means "Supreme Law Firm"
"SLL" means "Supreme Law Library"
and so on.  See the Supremacy Clause.

Just a few items for your orientation:

1.  I have added you to our electronic list of "Friends";
    treat this list like a newspaper, and use it only if,
    and when, it is useful;  we remove names upon request;

2.  Familiarize yourself with all the documents in the
    Supreme Law Library at URL=http://supremelaw.com,
    because there is much there already, and a lot more
    is coming (SLL = Supreme Law Library);

3.  The class action we discussed is a very real possibility;
    take the time to study the case law under 42 USCA 1983,
    and also read Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF in SLL, with 
    special emphasis on the 2 classes of citizenship;

4.  The vast majority of attorneys and lawyers would want
    to proceed under Title 42, using a "civil rights" theory;
    we much prefer the powerful combination of statutes at
    18 U.S.C. 241 and 242;  read these statutes in reverse
    order:  first comes the deprivation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS,
    and then there is conspicy to violate same, when 2 or more

5.  Effective assistance of Counsel is a fundamental Right
    guaranteed by the Constitution for the United States of
    America;  as such, deprivation of this Right invokes
    18 U.S.C. 242 and, if 2 or more are conspiring to 
    perpetrate the deprivation, then it is also conspiracy,
    in violation of 241;

6.  Whenever you have 2 state employees conspiring to 
    violate 242, there are 4 felonies:  one count for
    violating 242, and one count of violating 241 for
    the one, and one count of violating each for the
    other;  now you see precisely why these statutes
    are so powerful;

7.  The penalties are severe for deprivations which 
    involve kidnapping;  false imprisonment can be
    regarded as kidnapping;  it is a matter for the
    jury to decide;

8.  The class action I see working, is one in which
    we screen City Court victims into two groups:
    those who were native born, and those who were not;
    the native-born will plead a specific status which
    invokes the U.S. Constitution against Arizona state
    officials, e.g. Jay Cranshaw and his cronies;

9.  A one-page flyer can be distributed with an explanation
    on the front page, and a sign-up/screening sheet on the
    back page;  we will provide a mailing location, and 
    require $10 to screen each case;  we will then hire
    paralegals to verify the case number, name of party,
    nature of the case, and its disposition;  if they don't
    qualify, we send the money back (this eliminates our
    liability); if they do qualify, we send back a confirmation
    with an application form and directions for paying $100
    to join the class;

10. The City of Tucson is liable on two big counts:  their
    Intergovernmental Agreement ("IGA") has not been renewed
    by the Superior Court;  and, they are arraigning people
    without effective assistance of Counsel, in direct
    violation of the Sixth Amendment;  even if we lose on the
    IGA point, there is no question but that they are arraigning
    people without Counsel (e.g. people who know about the IGA
    problem, like Us!);  

11. We can negotiate a solution with the City, by moving towards
    a massive class action, and a bona fide settlement offer
    (carrot and stick), in which we propose that the settlement
    amount be derived from a "tax" on the airport revenues,
    effectively returning its control back to the City Council.

12. To confirm what I am saying to you, do two things:
    visit the downtown bus depot, right near the Congress
    Hotel, and note the name of the archways:  "Ronstadt";
    two, go into the City Court building downtown,
    begin asking who owns that building, and see how far
    you get;  we have confidential information that it is
    the Ronstadt family, NOT the City of Tucson!!  

    Need I say any more?

Stay in touch.  It was great to hear from you.
Use this email address for private email and
[address in tool bar] for public list traffic.


/s/ Paul Mitchell

p.s. Tell your friends about SLL.  It's FREE!
and its terrific (even if I do say so myself :)

copies:  off-site archivists

At 01:42 PM 11/4/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Good to hear from you. I was planning to send you an e-mail today just to 
>keep in touch.
>Hold your package for now anyway; I will give you a new address shortly.
>Been a busy day for me. The city seems to have lost my paperwork and I 
>wasn't arrested afterall. So they directed me to bring all my 
>documentation to city hall this morning. Another eye opening experience.
>Go to get going... Seeing a lawyer at 1400. Will, write later. I would 
>really like to talk to you about getting this airport back to the people 
>who built it.

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail