Time: Sat Nov 08 16:38:36 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA00490;
Sat, 8 Nov 1997 16:37:21 -0700 (MST)
by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA09540;
Sat, 8 Nov 1997 16:35:10 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd009527; Sat Nov 8 16:34:58 1997
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 1997 16:35:11 -0800
To: Ron Hill <ronhill@mail.enterprise.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: [DISASTER] Huge Proton Flare warning.
What should we do with personal computer equipment
and related peripherals, if anything?
----
10**8 = 100,000,000 TIMES more energy!!
What is the rate of wave propagation
from the source?
Standing by here,
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 09:29 AM 11/7/97 GMT, you wrote:
>This might cause some problems around the world ( reposted - originally from
>New Millennium who I have been unable to contact yet, for permission to
>repost, but in view of the disaster potential have assumed it would not be
>withheld) :
>
>Ronald Hill
>.......................................................................
>
>At approximately 1200 UTC (7am EST) this morning an ~X-9~ class flare
>was recorded by the solar measuring equipment used by NASA and SEC.
>Within 30 minutes an intense Proton flare event began at the GOES
>satellites as well.
>
>The massive flare that occurred on the 4th and has brought all the
>watches and anticipated magnetic storming (Nov 6-7-8) was an X-1 class
>flare. This mornings flare was an X-9, the ~very~ highest rating on the
>intensity scale for measuring the power output of solar flares. Just as
>the Xray signature of this new flare was much more powerful than
>Nov.4th's event, so was the Proton event that has followed.
>
>This is a difficult concept to grasp, but the energy released from this
>morning's X-9 flare was 100 million times more than with Tuesday's X-1
>flare. Each number on the flare scale represents a tenfold increase in
>energy output of the event; As an example, an X-2 is ten times more
>powerful than an X-1.
>
>If the alignment of the event was "geoeffective" (in good position
>relative to Earth) then we can expect a truly massive electron cloud and
>geomagnetic event sometime between the 8th and the 10th. According to
>NASA, the famous geomagnetic storm of 1989 came after a series of
>flares-the most powerful of which was an X-5; Obviously this event has
>the ~potential~ to be much much more powerful.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>
>************************************************************
>DISASTER-L email list on disaster preparedness, recovery, and survival.
>To unsubscribe or subscribe: send "unsubscribe DISASTER-L" or "subscribe
>DISASTER-L" to: majordomo@sonic.net. Post new messages to:
><DISASTER-L@sonic.net> - Wes Thomas <west@sonic.net>, list owner
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail