Time: Sun Nov 09 13:19:14 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA03736;
Sun, 9 Nov 1997 13:17:35 -0700 (MST)
by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA08077;
Sun, 9 Nov 1997 13:16:47 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 13:17:13 -0800
To: Ed Fischang <efischang@kozi.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: site needed
Hi Ed,
I have heard this also, but I don't have the
cites, however. The ruling which was quoted
to me essentially concurs with the statement
below, namely, cops are under no obligation
to protect individual Citizens.
We recommend that you develop a modest business
relationship with private security firms, and
negotiate a contract by which they agree to
come to your aid within a specific response time.
Also, it is best to have a private firearm:
one with punch and precision, like the H&K USP-40,
with optional high-capacity magazine (15 rounds).
This weapon is a semi-automatic hand gun with
a high-velocity bullet, which can be aimed with
great accuracy, after some practice.
If a prowler hears you engage the firing
mechanism, s/he would be very foolish to
continue with a break-in.
The threshhold of your front door is the
line of decision: if an unwanted prowler
crosses that line, you are free to assert
appropriate force, lethal if necessary.
Self-defense is a fundamental Right.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 10:08 AM 11/9/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Howdy Paul,
> I had this exchange with a woman on a mailing list, and I was wondering if
>you know of a source for an answer to her query. ---
>
>
>> CE> 1) As a person, I would like enough law enforcement officials
available
>> CE> that if I call the cops because someone is about to break into my home
>> CE> or cause some harm, they will be there johnny-on-the-spot. Are you
>> CE> suggesting we should be allowed to take the law into our own hands....
>
>> The police are under no obligation to protect you. Numerous court rulings
>> have held `law enforcement' agencies not responsible for failing to protect
>> civilians.
>
>I honestly wasn't aware of cases like these...Do you have any URL's with
>information on such cases? I would be very interested in reading them.
>
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail