Time: Sat Nov 15 05:15:57 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA18745
	for [address in tool bar]; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 05:13:44 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 05:13:02 -0700
To: butchaz@juno.com (Alfred R Martin)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: SLS: Arizona Department of Revenue
Cc: pmitch@primenet.com, supremelaw@ibm.net
References: <>


The key is to generate two identical requests:
one to the CIR, and the other to the AZ Dept.
of Revenue.  Then, you will start out with a 
foundation which will allow you to force a 
comparison of the two contracts.  Notice also
that the versions of this agreement, which we
have seen to date, define "IRS" (Internal Revenue
Service) as a bureau within the U.S. Department
of the Treasury.  Nothing could be further
from the truth, as you already know.  See below,
for a sample letter.

Good luck!

/s/ Paul Mitchell


TO:       David K. Smith
          Oklahoma Tax Commission
          State of Oklahoma
          c/o 2501 Lincoln Blvd.
          Oklahoma City 73194-0001/tdc

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     June 2, 1997

SUBJECT:  Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration
          between Oklahoma Tax Commission and "IRS" [sic]

I have  recently come to possess a photocopy of your Agreement on
Coordination of Tax Administration, executed between the Oklahoma
Tax Commission and the Internal Revenue Service, as requested and
received by a Citizen of Oklahoma state on May 16, 1997.

In Section 2: Definitions, We find the following definition:

     2.2  IRS  The term "IRS" means the Internal Revenue Service,
     U.S. Department of the Treasury [sic].
                                            [bold emphasis added]

Please provide  Us with  the exact  citation(s) within  Title 31,
United States  Code, which authorize the Internal Revenue Service
to exist  as a department or bureau within the U.S. Department of
the Treasury.  Our reading of Title 31 tells Us that the Internal
Revenue Service is not listed among those subordinate bureaus and
departments, unlike  the Bureau  of Engraving and Printing, which
is listed therein.  See 31 C.F.R. 51.2 and 52.2 for regulations.

Please also  take note  of the  fact that Title 31, United States
Code ("U.S.C."), has been enacted into positive law, rendering it
conclusive evidence  of the statutes in question.  By comparison,
Title 26,  U.S.C., has  not been enacted into positive law, which
means that  Internal Revenue  Code ("IRC")  section 7851(a)(6)(A)
now controls the applicability of all of subtitle F of the IRC --
Procedure and Administration.

The term  "this title"  as that term is used at IRC 7851(a)(6)(A)
refers to  Title 26, U.S.C.  For proof, compare, in pari materia,
the Historical  and Statutory Notes following 28 U.S.C. 132, with
the original  Act dated  June 25, 1948, C. 646, Sections 2 to 39,
62 Stat.  985 to  991, as  amended, specifically  under the  sub-
heading "Continuation of Organization of Court" [sic].

While you  are investigating your answer to this question, please
allow Us also to refer you specifically to the California Supreme
Court case  of People  v. Boxer,  docket number  S-030016,  dated
December 1992.  See Full Faith and Credit Clause for authority.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
Postal Zone 85719/tdc

email:       pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.2:
             preferred, to conserve all resources)
phone:       (520) 320-1514 (private line:
             please get permission to disclose)
fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy:
             available 24-hours per day or night)
fax modem:   (520) 320-1513 (dedicated email line:
             please call phone: to switch software)
web site:    http://www.supremelaw.com

copy:  Supreme Law School
       The Internet

                             #  #  #

At 01:07 PM 11/14/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Thank you Paul
>  Will send out for the FOIA today.
>Again, thanks

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail