Time: Mon Nov 17 15:41:47 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA15708;
Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:34:04 -0700 (MST)
by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA28978;
Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:30:59 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd028954; Mon Nov 17 15:30:51 1997
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:30:49 -0800
To: libnw@circuit.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: NOLO PRESS @ WWW.NOLO.COM (fwd)
There are so many different ways to
neutralize federal courts in tax cases,
it's really your call as to where you
might want to begin. First and foremost,
Lord v. Kelley proved that federal judges
are subject to the undue influence of the
IRS. Undue influence is an affirmative
defense.
We elevated this to a constitutional
question by proving that federal judges
are actually immune, by Law, from taxes
on their compensation. But, Chief Justice
Rehnquist told the UofA Law School last
January that ALL federal judges are now
paying income taxes on their judicial
compensation. To commemorate that event,
I wrote "The Lawless Rehnquist" now in the
Supreme Law Library. If you haven't read
this essay, I believe you should.
Therefore, all federal judges have an adverse
conflict of interest in violation of 28 U.S.C. 455,
as long as a valid W-4 is in effect. The proof
is in "The Cooper File" in the Supreme Law Library.
IRS is Trust #62, domiciled in Puerto Rico under
color of the Federal Alcohol Administration which
was declared unconstitutional in 1935.
And, as long as judges refuse to rescind same,
they are thereby disqualified from presiding
on the District Court of the United States,
or upon the United States District Court, in
any colorable attempt to prosecute a Citizen
of one of the several states for failing to
pay a voluntary tax (there is no liability
statute for taxes imposed by Subtitle A of
the Internal Revenue Code!!)
The rest of the story is thoroughly documented
in the 8 of 30 cases that are now loaded in the
Supreme Law Library.
There is no substitute for study and learning.
I can rip any indictment for tax law "violations"
in at least 4 places, without reaching page two:
1. federal grand juries are not legal bodies
2. United States of America have no standing to sue
3. United States District Court has no jurisdiction
4. U.S. Attorneys have no powers of attorney to
represent Plaintiffs USA
These four are usually more than enough to sink any
tax prosecution, without even reaching the subject
matter. If you get to page two, I can add still more
reasons, like "The Kick-Back Racket," Subtitle F has
no force and effect, the IRC is void for vagueness,
"State" means ONLY the federal zone, and so on.
These points are well documented already in Gilbertson's
OPENING BRIEF, now loaded in SLL and presently before
the 8th Circuit in St. Louis, last I heard.
The Clerk of that Court estimated that it would take
the 8th Circuit at least 2 years to sort out all
of the issues that we raised, on first impression,
in that one brief. "The Federal Zone," for example,
is an essential exhibit; the electronic seventh
edition is almost 700 pages of irrefutable documentation.
Why don't you help me out and buy a copy, instead
of bleeding me dry with these endless questions,
which everyone here expects me to answer for free?
If you are unable to earn the $10 fee to enroll
in the Supreme Law School, I am afraid we cannot
afford each other.
Freedom is not free. If you don't know that by now,
your situation is hopeless.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com
At 07:58 AM 11/17/97 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Paul,
> I think you missed the question. It was:
>
>>Would
>>a federal judge--whom you will appear before if you are prosecuted for
>>tax evasion and whose salary comes from the federal government--ever
>>likely uphold one of these schemes?
>
>It wasn't my question. I think I know the answer, but I would like to see
>if you can or will address the question.
>
>My best regards, Tim Fister
>----------
>> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>> To: Multiple recipients of Liberty_NW <libnw@circuit.com>
>> Subject: SLS: NOLO PRESS @ WWW.NOLO.COM (fwd)
>> Date: Monday, November 17, 1997 6:13 AM
>>
>>
>> Please cite the specific liability statutes
>> which impose subtitle A income taxes on
>> Citizens of the several states of the Union.
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://supremelaw.com
>>
>>
>>
>> At 09:19 PM 11/16/97 -0800, you wrote:
>> >Copyright =A9 Frederick W. Daily=20
>> >
>> >How legitimate are the seminars and books by "tax experts" claiming
>> >you don't have to pay income taxes?
>> >Not at all. Some of these con artists are very convincing. But if they
>> >had any legitimacy, I'd be first in line to stop paying taxes.
>> >Constitutional arguments against the tax laws are routinely
>> >struck down by U.S. federal courts. Typical scams involves multiple
>> >family trusts, limited partnerships and offshore banks. While these
>> >schemes can confuse and slow down the IRS, they are bogus, period. Would
>> >a federal judge--whom you will appear before if you are prosecuted for
>> >tax evasion and whose salary comes from the federal government--ever
>> >likely uphold one of these schemes? Get serious.=20
>> >
>> > Nolo Press | Legal Encyclopedia | Store | Tax Problems=20
>> >
>> > Nolo Press: www.nolo.com
>> >
>> >Copyright =A9 Nolo Press 1997
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>
>>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>
>>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>01
>> B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine
>02
>> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>03
>> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
>04
>> website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>05
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
>06
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
>07
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>08
>> _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words
>09
>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>10
>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>11
>>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>
>>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 12
>> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>13
>>
>>
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> LIBERTY NORTHWEST CONFERENCE Fidonet 1:346/16 (208) 267-9851
>> "The only libertarian-oriented political discussion conference on
>> the Fidonet Backbone..." SysOps AREAFIX: LIB_NW
>> Visit Liberty Northwest on the Web: http://www.saldivar.com/lib_nw/
>> Subscribe: libnw-on@circuit.com -- Unsubscribe: libnw-off@circuit.com
>>
>> ...Liberty is never an option... only a condition to be lost
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>LIBERTY NORTHWEST CONFERENCE Fidonet 1:346/16 (208) 267-9851
>"The only libertarian-oriented political discussion conference on
>the Fidonet Backbone..." SysOps AREAFIX: LIB_NW
>Visit Liberty Northwest on the Web: http://www.saldivar.com/lib_nw/
>Subscribe: libnw-on@circuit.com -- Unsubscribe: libnw-off@circuit.com
>
>...Liberty is never an option... only a condition to be lost
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail