Time: Sun Nov 30 18:26:55 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA02720 for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:26:20 -0700 (MST) by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA13758; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:25:37 -0700 (MST) via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd013736; Sun Nov 30 18:25:32 1997 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:20:02 -0800 To: ewolfe@involved.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLF: The children in Denver. I failed to mention earlier: Read the case of In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center Company, now loaded in the Supreme Law Library at the URL just below my name here. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com I have testified in federal court, several times. Read the legislative history. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com At 05:17 PM 11/30/97 -0800, you wrote: >Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote: >> >> See 18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513. > >Paul, > >I read both of those and although they are all >about witnesses, accomodations, treatment, >threats to, etc., neither of them define >"federal witness." > >If you're using the term generically, >it would mean that you are to testify for >the prosecution or defense on the gov't's >behalf. > >But it seems that you use the term as though >it's a standing status. > >Does that mean that by intending to testify >about matters you expect will someday come >to court, that you are invoking the protections >the fed grants to witnesses, specifically >those laws relating to the crime of attempting >to or preventing a witness from testifying? > >That's my best guess. > >Ed > > =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail