Time: Tue Dec 02 08:20:11 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA20418
for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 08:19:40 -0700 (MST)
by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA11920;
Tue, 2 Dec 1997 08:21:08 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd011724; Tue Dec 2 08:20:17 1997
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 08:13:00 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: The Waco Incident (fwd)
<snip>
>
>
>does come, that's a bridge we cross at that time.
>
>XX: Well, I appreciate what you all are doing. Keep getting the word
>out.
>
>JH: Thank you, sir. We appreciate your call. Mr. Hall, I think you
>alluded to it in the last hour. You said a lot of folks were upset.
>You said a lot of folks were mad. You said a lot of us are armed and
>yet at the same time we know there are still so many things we can do.
>One of the things, and I believe I would be correct in saying this,
>one of the things that most corrupt governments -- our system of
>government is not corrupt. The people in it are corrupt, and one of
>the greatest things those individuals would fear would be an educated
>electorate. Would that be correct?
>
>DH: I think you're exactly right. I believe that common sense among
>all of us as Americans -- the only thing I can see an uprising would
>do would destroy the country. Like you said, it's not time for
>anything like that. We have a good government, we just have some bad
>people in it, and we have to take these people out, and we do it
>through due process and elections, that type of thing. Guns are not
>the answer in my opinion.
>
>JH: Let's go to Missouri this evening where Ann is standing by.
>Hello, Ann.
>
>XX: Hi there.
>
>JH: How are you?
>
>XX: Mr. Hall, when you say that you're going to air this on your
>station in Oklahoma on the 19th of September, is there any way for
>those of us in the Kansas City, Missouri, area to get this? Can you
>help us with this?
>
>DH: What I would do is call, probably an independent television
>station if you. . .
>
>XX: Okay, that would be 50 or 62. They're the two independent.
>
>DH: . . .and they may already be taking the feed. Now this will be a
>national feed. It's a 140 stations that have already cleared. I'm
>not sure -- I'm at home tonight, so I don't have a list of those
>stations, and there's new stations that are coming online daily. It's
>quite possible already one of the stations in Kansas City are taking
>the feed and will air it at that time. But if not, I would call the
>station.
>
>XX: Call the stations here in the KC area?
>
>DH: Yeah. . .
>
>JH: Just call up the station -- in fact, Mr. Hall, if she were to call
>one of them now and they already know they are taking it, I'm sure
>they would tell her.
>
>DH: That's right. They will tell her.
>
>JH: So Ann, just call channel 50 and 62, I believe you mentioned there
>in your area. Ask either one. . .
>
>XX: They're the two independent stations here, yes.
>
>JH: . . .Yes. Call either one of them or both of them and ask them if
>they are taking the Waco program on the 19th and -- what time was
>that, sir?
>
>DH: I believe it's going to be either 7:00 or 8:00 Eastern time. They
>will see that. Promos will start on the show about the 20th of
>August, so they'll be seeing it on their station.
>
>JH: Fantastic. Ann, thank you very much for your call. Break time.
>"Washington On Trial" from the Peoples' Radio Network will continue.
>
>[Break]
>
>JH: Huntsville, Texas, reporting in. Hello, Bill.
>
>XX: I really appreciate the programs that you have. I think that talk
>radio has really revived and informed the electorate. I think that's
>what Con gress and them are afraid of. One question I had for Mr.
>Hall. I was a personal friend here of the "Houston Chronicle"
>representative that covered that, and I thought from the day that it
>happened that things just didn't fit. You don't dispense tear gas
>with tanks like they did. But I never could get any response out of
>her to delve into it. One thing that's bothered me, as Mr. Hall will
>remember. They brought in two dogs too, they said [DH is laughing] to
>sniff out a conflagrant. They came from Pennsylvania.
>
>DH: I laugh when I hear you say that.
>
>XX: Do you suppose that was to determine the cyanide concentration?
>
>DH: I'm not real sure what purpose those dogs had. They of course
>said they were looking for accellerant and I just don't know. It was
>almost to the point of being ridiculous to bring those dogs in there,
>as we looked at it, so I really don't have any idea what they were
>looking for other than just. . .I thought they were there to stage a
>play of some sort.
>
>XX: I felt maybe it was kind of similar to the rabbit test. [I think
>he may mean the canary test, grin] If the dog don't go in. . .
>
>DH: I wouldn't put anything past them.
>
>XX: But I had just never heard that mentioned. I remember them flying
>those in there.
>
>DH: Those dogs that came in, and the people that were involved in that
>-- one of those people was a former FBI agent, and I believe the other
>one worked or had worked for the Justice Department that had that firm
>[that owned the dogs] when we checked those people out that had the
>dogs. Again it was some of their people coming in to check. Nothing
>independent about any of that.
>
>XX: Well, we appreciate what you're doing and we're looking forward to
>it. Is this already set up for Senate hearings or what?
>
>DH: It isn't yet, but we're almost satisfied that it will be.
>
>XX: Okay, that's great.
>
>JH: Bill, thank you very much for your call, sir. From Huntsville,
>Texas we move to Covington, Indiana. Lee, hello.
>
>XX: I just wanted to call and tell you that I've been going around
>talking to Christian groups. Last Friday night I went to a group near
>here and talked to 55 people. We had Stu Webb there, and he's been
>travelling around Ohio and Indiana, and he talked for four hours. I
>got his book, too, and a tape on him. But I wanted to let you know I
>was working at it, and I appreciate you down there. Also I've called.
>. .I sent you some mail, I don't know whether you got it or not.
>
>JH: I'll have to go back and double check it. Our mail sometimes is a
>little slow, according to the volume. The heavy amount sometimes
>slows it down.
>
>XX: The Attica station where I pick you up at 1:00 every night [WBQR
>FM] -- I've been taping your shows for the last two months -- they
>changed hands and they took you and Chuck [Harder] off.
>
>JH: Rascals. But we appreciate the time they allowed us on. Maybe
>they'll get us back.
>
>XX: Well, I don't know. I think another station bought it that's tied
>up with the main news media. I'm really disappointed because I have
>no way of picking you up.
>
>JH: Well, check shortwave radio, 11.950, and start checking around
>midnight. [This should be WINB, Red Lion, Pennsylvania.]
>
>XX: Does it come on as a replay?
>
>JH: I believe so. I'm not totally sure. I'm passing on what I
>believe to be accurate information. I believe it's around midnight,
>and you might want to try 11.950.
>
>XX: And I might say, too that I've called Senator Lugar's office
>[Richard G. Lugar, R-IN] several times and I've called Senator Coats
>[Dan Coats, R-IN]. Now Senator Lugar is running for office. I've
>been out here working against him, trying to get him beat, because
>he's selling us down the creek.
>
>JH: Well, sir, we've got to all get in this thing and work together
>just as Mr. Hall said earlier. There is a way to do it, and it is by
>getting involved in the system. If we've got bad people in it, let's
>get them out. Let's put some decent people in there. Back to the old
>adage of Edmund Burke -- we've said it I don't know how many times --
>"Evil prospers when good men do nothing." If we're not doing
>anything, that's why evil is prospering. We've got to change that.
>
>XX: I called six to ten Congressmen last week and I just tell them we
>don't like this GATT, we don't like NAFTA, we don't like gun control,
>we don't like. . .and also I called the Senators, too, like you
>recommended. . .
>
>JH: Thank you, sir.
>
>XX: . . .about this biological diversity, and I called them about
>that. Well, nice talking to you sir.
>
>JH: Lee, thank you very much and just keep up the good work, sir.
>Thank you.
>
>XX: You might not remember me. I'm the one that was in the
>legislature for 24 years.
>
>JH: Oh, yes! Okay! Absolutely! Well God bless you, sir. Yeah,
>yeah. You know, I'm terrible on names, but the voice kept ringing a
>bell and I was saying to myself, "I know I've talked to this gentleman
>before. He has been involved in government." Great! All right!
>
>XX: You talk to thousands of people, but you do a wonderful job.
>
>JH: Thank you, Lee. I appreciate your call. Keep up the good work.
>We move from Covington, Indiana, to the great State of Kansas where
>Steve is holding, and good evening, Steve.
>
>XX: I want to inform the people across the country. . .Steven Higgins
>started out in Omaha, Nebraska, for IRS in 1961 and then he was
>transferred to Dallas, Texas, in 1963. Then he had a big promotion
>after that -- he went up the ladder fast. He went to Chicago, then to
>Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and then back to Houston, possibly 1972.
>I was wondering what Mr. Higgins was doing this date.
>
>JH: Mr. Hall, was Mr. Higgins a scapegoat in this situation? [Steven
>Higgins was in charge of the BATF at the time of the initial assault.]
>
>DH: I don't think so. He was a big part of it and of course he's not
>working now, but he does draw a government pension.
>
>JH: I mean, was he a sacrificial lamb?
>
>DH: Well I think that he may have been that to have got the heat off.
>That was the word we got early on that the five people that was
>dismissed by Bentsen [Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen] was basically
>to get the heat off. . .and that was from some of the field agents.
>The field agents themselves will tell you, many of them will, that
>this was basically a cover-up and this was the ATF that I talked with
>in this respect. Also earlier on, you talked about Ann Richards of
>Texas. She knew full well that that story was fabricated. We have
>sources with the ATF that have told us that.
>
>JH: All right. Ladies and gentlemen, we're up against a break. Let's
>take our break at this point and again remind you that our telephone
>number is 1-800-TALK-YES, 1-800-825-5937. General Manager of KPOC
>television, Ponca City, Oklahoma, David Hall is with us. Washington
>On Trial will continue.
>
>[Break]
>
>JH: Back to our phones. Kansas City, and Ann is on-line. Hello, Ann.
>
>XX: Hello. I want to thank you both for what you do for our country,
>your perseverance and your research. Possibly I'm asking you a stupid
>question. In listening to the Senate Whitewater hearings some of the
>times they referred to the Waco meeting with Roger Altman and the
>Treasury Department. Is that because the ATF is under them? I feel
>like Bentsen is buried to his ears [? garbled here] in this Waco.
>
>JH: Of course, Mr. Hall, correct me if I'm wrong, but the BATF
>certainly is part of the Treasury Department. The buck stops, at
>least in theory, with Lloyd Bentsen there. As far as the Waco meeting
>itself, I'm drawing a blank right now on exactly what they might have
>reference too there.
>
>DH: I'm doing the same thing. One thing that comes to mind -- all of
>these people are from that area, basically from Waco.
>
>XX: I know they are, and I really feel like there's some motive there
>besides the BATF wanted to get more money for themselves.
>
>JH: Well you remember of course at that time the BATF was about to be
>disbanded. The talk around Washington was that they were an
>organization that had served their purpose, they were not needed any
>longer. They basically were the Prohibition Police when they came
>into existence, and when the Prohibition Amendment was repealed, there
>was no reason to keep them. They added tobacco and firearms into it
>and tobacco is not near the problem certainly that it was at one time.
>Firearms are not near the problem they make it out to be. So they
>were about to be disbanded or at least merged with some other
>organization, and they needed -- and it has been freely admitted --
>they needed a feather in their cap.
>
>XX: It seems like there were other motives. I'm wondering about the
>property as well as. . .
>
>JH: Mr. Hall, who has the property?
>
>DH: The Branch Davidians have the property. There's 77 acres left and
>900 acres that was there, and they do have that property. My
>understanding is they're going to, probably in the near future, set a
>church up on the site.
>
>JH: So there will be reconstruction on the site?
>
>DH: That's the information I have at this time. Another thing that
>might be interesting to note, the ATF code name for this operation was
>"Showtime".
>
>JH: Exactly. It was. . .even as they state in their report, it was to
>be a dynamic entry, and by that they mean a "showtime" entry. . .it
>was flash-bang grenades, it was yelling and screaming, it wasn't going
>up to the door and knocking and on the door and saying, "We have a
>warrant. May we come in?" as a normal situation would be. It was
>literally as the name suggests, showtime. Ann, thank you. Let's move
>from Kansas City to Maryville, Tennessee this evening. In Maryville,
>Tennessee, it's Tom. Good evening, Tom.
>
>XX: This is the first time I've ever heard your show, and I've been
>doing research myself for the past four or five weeks and have been on
>some talk shows around here bringing on some stuff on regionalism and
>the government. Very quick question, I want to get on and off. One,
>will the tape that has been made be available for sale, and if so,
>where can it be gotten? And number two, I have heard rumor, cannot
>confirm, do not know, were there actually British SAS or foreign
>troops at the Waco scene during the time period? Thank you.
>
>DH: Okay, in answering his question, Jerry, we know that British
>Intelligence -- now who they were. . .you know, I assume that British
>Intelligence is like the CIA, I don't know that. All we know is that
>they were with British Intelligence. I, again can't say who they were
>with. There was another question, I forgot what it was.
>
>JH: Okay, the other question was are you going to make the program
>available in the form of a videotape?
>
>DH: To my knowledge right now, I think that through your network it is
>going to be made available.
>
>JH: Good. Okay. We'll certainly, when we get the full information on
>that, we'll pass it along to folks. Ladies and gentlemen, again check
>your local listings. September the 19th will be date of the program.
>. ."Waco: What Really Happened", or at least an investigative report
>on Waco. Is that the working title, "Waco: What Really Happened"?
>
>DH: No, it's "Waco Incident: The True Story".
>
>JH: "Waco Incident: The True Story". Check your local listings and
>see the stations in your area that will be carrying it. If not,
>encourage one of them to carry it. It will be made available on a
>nationwide feed by a satellite of course, and if they need more
>information they can contact, well they can contact, I guess, Mr.
>Hall, they can contact you at KPOC, the stations can.
>
>DH: Right.
>
>JH: Ladies and gentlemen, stay with us. It's break time. We'll be
>back with your calls at 1-800-TALK-YES, 1-800-825-5937. "Washington
>On Trial" from the Peoples' Radio Network will continue shortly.
>
>[Break]
>
>JH: And to our phones to the great State of Idaho, and Jim is on-line.
>Hello, Jim.
>
>XX: Yeah, I have a question about the Waco incident. Seeing that
>there are a lot of people against the new world order, and there are a
>lot of groups organized, both religious and non-religious, that kind
>of watch out for each other and are preparing for the worst, does your
>guest seem to think there'll be more of these incidents.
>
>DH: Of course early on we had information that the Justice Department
>was looking at four or five different groups, and I think that since
>our story has started, and a lot of the information has been broken,
>that they're going to be a little reluctant about accellerating
>attacks against religious organizations. I think that it slowed them
>down to a great deal, a great degree. I've talked with people in the
>Justice Department, John Russell, who's an aide to Janet Reno, and of
>course he initiated an action against a church in Minnesota back four
>or five months ago and I've talked with him about that and different
>things. I believe the trend right now, their trend would be to
>low-key it, keep quiet for a while, and I think that's what they're
>doing. They're just sitting still.
>
>XX: You mean they'll use the IRS?
>
>DH: Well, I don't know that they're going to use anyone to attack
>anyone. I think that right now they run the risk. . .you know, we
>have basically here information that's going to indict them. And I'm
>being quite frank about that. I don't think they want any more
>problem. I think they're preparing for the fight on the front that
>they've got coming at them right now, and I think that the Clinton
>government has that, you know, they know this front is moving towards
>them. I can't talk to any Senator or any Congressman that doesn't
>already know about information that we have and has already. . .you
>know, people across the United States have written letters to them and
>we even had some of the Congressmen call us. So, I would encourage
>people to continue to write letters because certainly the FBT, ATF,
>Internal Revenue Service, they know these things are coming, and
>there's people that are working in areas that probably you don't even
>know about at this time, like re-structuring the IRS. Bills and
>different things are being written. So I think. . .I don't think that
>there's any need for anyone to. . .I wouldn't want to encourage anyone
>to think about arming themselves, doing maneuvers, things like this.
>I don't think that that's necessary. I think that government is
>pushing towards the GATT bill, but I don't know that that's going to
>be passed. The Congressmen are telling me they're not going to vote
>for it because I think that talk radio has played a big. . .it's the
>only thing that can stop it at this point in time, and probably will.
>
>JH: Jim and Mr. Hall both, I believe that you will agree with me, that
>our adversaries -- and I mean that only in the sense now that they
>would wish to have socialism in this nation and we would wish for the
>Constitutional Republic that it is supposed to be -- our adversaries
>are not dummies, they're not fools by any stretch of the imagination,
>and they know about the undertow, they know about the undercurrent
>that, Mr. Hall, you referred to earlier, they know that a lot of
>silent people -- and by that I mean people who are not big campaign
>contributors, people who are not party attendees in that they don't go
>to parties and the teas for the candidates, but folks who vote and
>folks who pay taxes and folks who have jobs and as Mr. Hall suggested,
>folks who are armed. They know they are upset. And the last thing
>they want to do is have their house of cards come tumbling down around
>them. They've done very well, thank you, they've done very well
>taking us over with gradualism. They've done very well with the old
>thing of two steps forward and one step back. And I don't believe
>they're going to do anything right now with people watching to change
>that. I think they're going to continue their course and just play
>the same game they've been playing.
>
>XX: Well, I sure hope so, because I've seen an accelleration in the
>pace of the gradualism in the last year.
>
>JH: Well I agree with you that certainly has happend, but I believe
>that probably because of Waco, and probably -- and I say this and hope
>that people don't take it the wrong way -- Bill Clinton is probably
>one of the best things that has happened to the United States of
>America in the last 50 years, because he has galvanized the American
>people and he has awakened more people than anybody else I know. Mr.
>Perot and Mr. Clinton are responsible getting more people involved in
>the political process than probably anyone else in modern-day history.
>Mr. Perot did it in a good way, Mr. Clinton did it in a roundabout
>way. But folks are fed up. People are tired of all this stuff and
>they're looking for answers, and if they don't find them pretty
>quickly, they're going to manufacture the answers themselves by
>getting rid of a bunch of scoundrels and scalawags, putting,
>hopefully, some decent people in their place, and once we do that,
>hopefully we will not repeat or continue to make the mistakes of the
>past.
>
>XX: A good grand jury investigation into Bill Clinton would sure make
>him scared, wouldn't it?
>
>JH: A good grand jury investigation led by prosecutor who would not be
>afraid of losing his nice, cushy job.
>
>XX: Exactly. There ain't very many of them.
>
>JH: Jim, I appreciate your call, sir. Thank you. How many, if I
>might just
> use the term Mr. Hall, how many common folks have you and
>reporters and your team talked to -- John Does, Mary Does, how many
>have you talked to, and what seems to be the consensus of the people?
>Do they seem to think that Waco was a necessity? Do they think it was
>murder? Do they think it was an accident? What do they think?
>
>DH: We've talked with people all over the country, and people believe
>it was out and out murder. Locally here, we're involved in the
>different cities that surround us because of our news department, with
>police departments and things. We've shared information with them
>about Waco. Of course, they have certainly a different outlook on the
>FBI, the ATF and the United States government than they did, say a
>year ago. Of course, we're dealing with patrolmen, chiefs of police
>and people like that. Other people out on the street we encounter on
>a. . .basically in a daily business. We have locally here, the
>interest in the story that we're doing, we have people call the
>station every day locally wanting to know about this story. So
>there's a lot of interest, and it's waking up a lot of people. These
>people here are talking to the same people in Congress and Senate that
>I talk with because the Senators and Congressmen tell me. So they,
>you know, we've stirred up a hornet's nest here and it's going to run
>its course. We've pledged ourselves to see this thing out. Normally,
>the normal thing you do with a story like this is you, well you don't
>normally have a story like this, I can't say that with this type of
>thing, but the normal thing would be that you do your story and then
>let the chips fall. But there was so much wrongdoing in this thing
>that it. . .all of us that were involved with it, it took us out of
>the scope of the news business. It took us out of the scope of the
>news business. It took us into a different scope altogether, because
>we were fearful that the people that were involved in this atrocity --
>and I have to call it an atrocity -- would not be prosecuted, would
>not be put under a microscope and looked at, and so we made that our
>job, right along with doing the movie. We didn't have to take
>criminal investigators down there. We didn't have to go to court. We
>could have put this thing off and done it this way or that way, but we
>had a drive. We saw -- and I think each and every individual that was
>involved in this story -- saw this country just crumbling around us
>here, and that we couldn't, you know, we somehow had to do something
>about it. So that's why we took all the actions that we did, the
>legal maneuvers and the Senate Judiciary Report and all those things.
>As the months of September and October roll along, I think more and
>more people will hear about it in Congress and in the Senate.
>
>JH: Ladies and gentlemen, let's take our break. When we come back, we
>will continue with our guest, David Hall, General Manager of KPOC,
>Ponca City, Olkahoma, talking about their investigation into Waco and
>the television special that will be coming up on the 19th of
>September. Your calls at 1-800-TALK-YES when we continue in two
>minutes.
>
>[Break]
>
>JH: And Laredo, Texas, on-line. Darrell, good evening.
>
>XX: Just a couple of comments, then I've got a question of your guest.
>A little breath of fresh air, maybe. . .I noticed over on C-SPAN today
>they were discussing the anti-crime bill. There were Congressmen
>Gekas and McCollum [George W. Gekas, R-PA and Bill McCollum, R-FL],
>all Republicans incidentally, that were violently opposed to it, and
>they were in the House Rules Committee and they were putting on some
>pretty good arguments in there about how they can stop it. You know,
>whether or not it'll work, but at least we've got a couple of them up
>there on our side.
>
>JH: Keep calling and writing, absolutely.
>
>XX: In my pre-For The People days, when Waco first hit the news, I was
>taken in like I think probably 95% of the Americans were, that, hey,
>you know, we've got something going here, and our government's taking
>care of it for us. But the longer it went on, the more I could see
>through it and the more information I get on it, the more I'm amazed
>at how the government is just running rampant over the People.
>
>JH: Regrettably, sir, probably the vast majority of the American
>people were taken in. The coverage was very slanted, the information
>that was being released was very slanted. It's no wonder that many of
>us were taken in. But as you suggest, in the aftermath a lot of us
>have had our eyes opened.
>
>XX: Yes indeed. Mr. Hall, this telecast you're going to put on
>September 19th, is that going to be on any network transmission?
>
>DH: A lot of the independent stations, and there will be some network
>stations that carry it, it'll just be up in the air, and they'll pull
>it down. There's about 140. . .in your area, I'm not, I don't know if
>there's a station there that's going to carry it or not. I know that
>Dallas has three stations carrying it. Houston, there's a Houston
>station that's carrying it.
>
>XX: If it's not in Spanish, I probably won't get it down here. I do
>have satellite, though. Will it be on any of the satellites and can
>you give me the number?
>
>DH: I don't know the number of the satellite, but it will be on
>satellite and it won't be scrambled or anything, so anybody can pick
>it up on satellite.
>
>XX: How can I find out without looking through all 487 satellite
>transponders?
>
>DH: If you call the station tomorrow, somebody there could tell you.
>
>XX: Can you give me a number, please?
>
>DH: It's 405-767-8827, and somebody there can tell you.
>
>XX: Okay. You're making me proud of the Okies. Even we don't see the
>Cotton Bowl much any more.
>
>DH: I was in in Waco not long ago. . . or down to Laredo -- I've been
>there a time or two -- and I know some people there, at any rate I
>thought I'd pass that on to you.
>
>XX: Next time you're this way, give me a holler and we'll get
>together. Good talking to you.
>
>JH: 1-800-TALK-YES, 1-800-825-5937. Snyder, Texas, staying in the
>Lone Star State. Bill, good evening.
>
>XX: Thank you so much for the show you're putting on for us tonight.
>The question I have is this. The people who have been sentenced, I
>think unjustly, down in Austin after the massacre we had there, what
>is the possibility of those poor people being released from prison? I
>don't think they should be there to start with.
>
>DH: I believe that probably the attorneys, or other attorneys, will
>probably file for a new trial. Those people, by the way, are in
>Oklahoma, some of them are, today, at the federal reformatory at El
>Reno. [About 50 miles west of Oklahoma City. Ponca City is about
>halfway between Wichita and Oklahoma City.]
>
>XX: At El Reno.
>
>DH: And we're in touch with some of those people. Let's see, I'm
>trying to think. . .Livingston Fagan is there, and Renos Adrian [sp?],
>he's there. And then at Three Rivers, Texas, there's a couple of them
>there and one of them in Louisiana. But I do believe that the
>evidence that we're bringing to the Senate will have something to do
>and have an impact on their situation. [Three Rivers is about 60
>miles northwest of Corpus Christi, about a third of the way from
>Corpus Christi to San Antonio. You can find Louisiana on your own.]
>
>XX: Well, listen, you don't know how much I appreciate what you're
>doing. My hat's off to you.
>
>DH: Well, thank you very much. Our agenda has been to get the right
>people prosecuted and do something to get these boys out of jail, and
>that's what we. . .
>
>XX: We just don't seem to have enough people in the world like you.
>
>DH: [Laughing] Well, I'm sure they're out there.
>
>XX: Well, we really appreciate you, we also appreciate our radio
>station here in Snyder, KSNY, for bringing your show to us.
>
>JH: Absolutely. We thank the station.
>
>XX: Thank you so much.
>
>DH: You bet. I want to say something, Jerry. People in the cities
>where the radio stations are carrying you all -- and I say that as an
>Oklahoman, "you all" you noticed -- they should be proud of those
>stations.
>
>JH: Well, in Alabama we said "you'uns" rather than "you all", and I
>guess we all have our differences there. We certainly appreciate our
>affiliate stations. Without them, obviously, the program would not be
>on the air. Let's cover again, for folks who might just be tuning in
>-- of course we're talking with David Hall, the General Manager of
>KPOC in Ponca City, Oklahoma. If you're a regular listener, you will
>remember back in late June, I believe it was, Mr. Hall and his
>daughter, Christina, were on. Christina is an investigative reporter,
>a journalist who had been in the Waco area and had been gathering a
>lot of information for an accurate report, the truth on Waco. That
>work will be contained in a two hour special program that will be
>available for viewing across the United States of America on many
>independent as well as some network television stations -- consult
>your local listings. It'll be on the evening of September the 19th of
>1994. Eastern time is going to be 8 or 9, is that correct?
>
>DH: That's correct.
>
>JH: All right. If you want to check with your local station, check
>first maybe with your VHF or UHF independents, then check with the
>others. If nobody is carrying it, encourage them to do so. Now, Mr.
>Hall, what kind of clearance would a local station need? Do they just
>contact KPOC about that?
>
>DH: We have -- I don't have the number here at the house -- the
>syndicator is in California that's shooting that up, and Ray Horn
>[sp?] is handling that. The number is at the station, and if they
>call him direct, it is on a barter basis.
>
>JH: So they can call the station and make arrangements at least have
>the station get the number for the syndicator?
>
>DH: Right.
>
>JH: And that number again is 405-767-8827, I believe, for the TV
>stations that might want to get in contact with the syndicator. All
>right, ladies and gentlemen, we're going to be taking our break. When
>we come back, we'll be wrapping up this evening with our guest, David
>Hall, General Manager of KPOC, talking about Waco, the truth on Waco,
>the results of their long, and I'm sure very expensive, investigation.
>Finding out about the cyanide gas, finding out about. . .well, just
>many terrible things that a lot of us believed and a lot of us felt
>was the case, and the investigative work of Mr. Hall and his crew
>there at KPOC have pretty well borne out exactly what many of us
>feared -- that it was indeed virtually an outright murder of
>individuals inside that church complex. We'll be back in two minutes.
>
>[Break]
>
>[This heart-breaking poem is called "Lost Laughter"]
>
>JH:
>
>Yesterday, the air was free and the great bird ruled the sky.
>A dream, an idea, time had come and brave men went off to die.
>The eagle soared with hypnotic grace, clouds echoed her screams.
>No one had to say a word, so long ago it seems.
>A wind would blow across the land and every child would feel its
> breeze.
>"God bless mommy, and daddy, too!" before bedtimes on their knees.
>"I want to go out and play. I want to catch a fish."
>"Let's go pet the puppies, now. I want to make a wish."
>But time waits for not a soul, so quickly passing by.
>Lives would be far too short, the children were to die.
>"Mommy! There's a bad man outside! I'm hungry and I'm thirsty, too."
>"Why will little brother sleep forever? Is what they say about Heaven
>
> true?"
>"My eyes are burning really bad and I cannot see my friends!"
>"The fire is so very hot! Mommy, please make it end!"
>Children's blood now stains our flag, tonight they play on streets of
> gold.
>Never to see those bad men again, never to grow old.
>We watched it all come about, the machines of wars of men.
>We did nothing to help those children, can they forgive us of our sin?
>Where was the majestic bird that day? She did not take to flight.
>Listen, citizen, to the wind, and hear the children scream tonight.
>
>[end of poem]
>For the seventeen children, ladies and gentlemen, we must never
>forget. We must remember tonight, tomorrow, the next day, the next
>week, the next month, the next year, the next generation. . .never to
>let it happen again. And thanks to the works of Mr. David Hall,
>General Manager of KPOC and his investigative news team, on the 19th
>of September, the American people will have an opportunity to see what
>really happened, to find out about what happened on that April the
>19th, 1993 day, when 218 years before, the fire from the muskets at
>Lexington and Concord echoed in what was supposed to be freedom and
>liberty for all of us. Mr. Hall, the American people owe you and KPOC
>and no doubt a lot of your employees a debt of gratitude, sir. I want
>you to know a lot of us are very appreciative for your work.
>
>DH: Jerry, what you just said -- we go to bed with tears and wake up
>of a morning about those kids, and it brings tears to your eyes to
>think about that. We're going to continue on until -- with your help
>and people like you across this nation -- we're going to bring these
>people to justice. I want to say that [voice cracks]. . .it chokes
>you up thinking about those kids. . .and that's been our main drive
>and once again to get these boys out of jail, and you're doing a
>wonderful job. You know, I'm at a loss of words here. . .that poem
>about got me.
>
>JH: Well, sir, I tell you what. There's enough for us to remember.
>In fact, I think we've had enough martyrs in the United States in
>modern day. I think we've had more than enough actions after the
>Weaver situation, the Waco situation, and many others that we could go
>into. We've had enough of that. And it's time for the American
>people, it's time for We the People of the United States of America to
>take our government back, to get involved, to work in the system, to
>change it, to throw the bad out, to keep the good, and go forward and
>never have to think about a Waco again. Sir, I appreciate you and I
>hope you'll continue to keep us informed. Again, ladies and
>gentlemen, on September the 19th, check your local listings between
>8:00 pm, 9:00 pm Eastern time for the Waco story being brought to you
>of course from the folks at KPOC. It'll be available across the
>United States. Check your local listings. Mr. Hall, God bless you,
>sir. Thank you for being with us this evening.
>
>DH: God bless you.
>
>JH: And ladies and gentlemen, we thank you for allowing us to share
>this time with you tonight on "Washington On Trial." For the Peoples'
>Radio Network, I'm Jerry Hughes. Good night America.
>
>=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/
>
>The KPOC videotape is available by calling (405)767-8827 or you can
>write them at KPOC-TV, 114 W. Central, Ponca City, Oklahoma, 74601.
>The cost is $23.45. (Cheap when you consider another cost could be
>your liberty.]
>
>Late-breaking news -- in addition to the numerous lawsuits filed
>against the government by surviving Davidians or relatives of those
>murdered as well as the $150 million wrongful death suit against Janet
>Reno, there has been a suit filed by former Attorney General Ramsey
>Clark. If you're not familiar with Clark, he is quite liberal. His
>is a multi-BILLION dollar suit.
>
>Clark's suit was filed in February, 1995, on the anniversary of the
>original raid. Did you hear about it on your news or in your
>newspaper? Probably not. He also made the announcement at Mt. Carmel
>in front of at least 50 media trucks and satellite uplinks. It would
>more than likely have made the national news except for another event
>that day (April 19th, 1995) -- the bombing in Oklahoma City.
>
>Events which occurred on April 19th, historically:
>
> The colonists met the British at Lexington and Concord. The
>British were coming to disarm them.
>
> The Germans and the ghettos.
>
> The explosion in the gun turret on the U.S.S. Iowa killed 47
>sailors
>
> The governor of South Dakota died in a plane crash
>
> The Gesta^H^H^H^H Government murdered the Branch Davidians.
>
>=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/=/
>
>There is a jerk on the nets CLAIMING to be with the FBI. He is saying
>things that contradict with the testimony of witnesses (see
>particularly around line 413 in this text). Either he is a liar, or
>he is not with the FBI. He either doesn't know what he is talking
>about, or he is lying. If he IS with the FBI, he is either lying, or
>he is releasing (incorrect) information about a case that is not
>closed yet. In any case, he is a lying jerk who should be ignored.
>Too bad there are far too many government employees like him.
>
>With any luck, after September 19 he and all of his fellow federal
>Gestapo stormtrooping baby-killing murderers will be out of
>employment. No pensions, either, just out on their asses looking for
>real jobs and struggling to make it like the rest of us -- IF they are
>fortunate enough to get a job after people find out they are baby
>killers. I hope most of them rot in jail for the rest of their
>natural lives. The primary people (Ricks, Aguillera, etc.) should be
>executed (Texas has the death penalty). Perhaps herd them into a
>barn, lock the doors, and set fire to it.
>
>Under no circumstances should any of them receive any pension or
>severance pay. And that's just for the ones who were marginally
>involved. Anyone who was involved in the murders and the cover-up and
>who has not come forward up to this point should be bodily removed
>from office or job and charged with complicity in at least 87 counts
>of first degree murder.
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: "J. Orlin Grabbe" <kalliste@aci.net>
>
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail