Time: Thu Dec 04 16:45:31 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA22415
	for <pmitch@local01.primenet.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:44:35 -0500 (EST)
	by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA13270;
	Thu, 4 Dec 1997 16:48:37 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd013230; Thu Dec  4 16:48:30 1997
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 16:38:35 -0800
To: <jammin@u.washington.edu>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
 n.edu>
References: <3.0.3.16.19971204052951.2f072898@pop.primenet.com>

My apologies to you.

During this escalating crisis,
it is impossible for us to remain
neat and tidy, all the time.

I hope you can appreciate this.

Thanks in advance, for doing so.

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com


At 02:50 PM 12/4/97 -0800, you wrote:
>How many times are we going to get this?  Please send things only once.
>You clutter up people's mailboxes when you do this.
>
>
>"Wisdom is the perfect joining of creativity, logic, and truth."
>
>						-- The Wise Conservative
>
>On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>
>> [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>> 
>> 
>>                                       c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
>>                                          Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>                                                  ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>> 
>>                                                 November 30, 1997
>> Mr. Richard Matsch
>> United States District Court
>> Federal Building
>> Denver, Colorado state
>> 
>> Subject:  Murdering Children to Save the Spies
>> 
>> Dear Mr. Matsch:
>> 
>> I am finally going to break my self-imposed silence on one of the
>> most heinous  acts of terrorism this nation has ever experienced.
>> I believe  that you,  sir, are  a traitor, and I am quite willing
>> and able to prove it.  I do so, herein.  Read on.
>> 
>> In my  several years  of specializing  in federal  law,  you  can
>> imagine my  shock one  day, when  I discovered  how easy  it  had
>> become to  rip any  federal indictment  into manifold  shreds  of
>> paper, without even reading to the second page.
>> 
>> Beginning at  the top, we usually find one or more U.S. ATTORNeys
>> listed as  having power(s)  of ATTORNey  to represent  the UNITED
>> STATES OF AMERICA (spelled in CAPITAL LETTERS, per force).  Title
>> 28 of the United States Code does not authorize U.S. ATTORNeys to
>> represent the  UNITED STATES  OF AMERICA,  but  only  the  United
>> States.  Count one:  misrepresentation.
>> 
>> To "ATTORN"  is to  supervise the  transfer of an estate from the
>> old lord  to the  new lord;  it is a term from feudal law.  Isn't
>> it interesting  how closely  the terms  "feudal" and "federal" do
>> sound, when  juxtaposed right next to each other?  The long chain
>> of coincidences does not stop here.  Keep reading!
>> 
>> Further on down the first page of any federal indictment, we then
>> find that  all criminal  prosecutions are commenced in the United
>> States District  Court ("USDC").   Unfortunately, the USDC has no
>> criminal jurisdiction  whatsoever.   This has  now been proven by
>> the utter  and demonstrable  silence by the Department of Justice
>> to several  Freedom of  Information Act ("FOIA") requests for the
>> statute(s), if  any, which  grant the  USDC original jurisdiction
>> over  criminal   prosecutions.    There  is  none.    Count  two:
>> deprivation of due process.
>> 
>> Reaching the  so-called real parties of interest now, these bogus
>> criminal actions  [sic] invariably  show  the  UNITED  STATES  OF
>> AMERICA as  the moving  Party, but  the Congress  of  the  United
>> States has  never granted  legal standing to the UNITED STATES OF
>> AMERICA to  sue, or  be sued,  in the  USDC.  It is true that the
>> United States  has been  granted standing  to sue, or be sued, in
>> the USDC, but the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the United States
>> [sic], are  not one  and the  same.  This you should have learned
>> way back in law school but, alas, they did not teach these things
>> in law  schools way  back when  you were  a student;   they still
>> don't teach these things in law schools.  Count three:  fraud.
>> 
>> The names  of criminal  defendants are likewise always spelled in
>> ALL CAPITAL  LETTERS, which  has now  been nailed  for invoking a
>> subtle, unconstitutional,  yes, even  criminal subterfuge whereby
>> martial rule  is impressed upon the People of America, in blatant
>> violation of  the prohibition against treason.  Evidently, I need
>> to remind  you that  one of  the penalties  for treason is death.
>> But, you  already  know  these  things,  correct?    Count  four:
>> treason (a capital offense).
>> 
>> Very  rarely,  however,  do  litigants  think  to  challenge  the
>> legality of  the body which issued these bogus indictments in the
>> first place.   You  probably do  not know how many times this has
>> already been done -- properly, timely, lawfully, and correctly --
>> because an  active conspiracy  is afoot, within the Department of
>> Just US, to obstruct any and all pleadings which nail the federal
>> Jury Selection  and Service  Act  for  blatant,  unconstitutional
>> discrimination against  Citizens of  the several  states.   Quite
>> simply, those  who are  qualified to  make law  in  America  are,
>> nevertheless, prevented  from serving  on grand and petit juries,
>> or from  voting in  general elections.   Those  who can  serve on
>> grand and  petit  juries,  or  vote  in  general  elections,  are
>> prevented by  Law from  serving in  any federal  elected offices.
>> Doesn't this strike you as strange?  Count five:  conspiracy.
>> 
>> All federal judges are also paying income taxes on their judicial
>> compensation, in  blatant violation  of the  prohibition  against
>> same which  is found in Article III.  This prohibition was upheld
>> in the  magnificent opinion of the Supreme Court in Evans v. Gore
>> in  1920.     Lately,  however,  our  august  Chief  Justice  has
>> confirmed, in  front of a graduate class in the Law School of the
>> University  of   Arizona,  that  "there  has  been  a  change  in
>> doctrine."   But, in  a rare  moment of  sanity, one  of your own
>> colleagues proved,  in Lord  v. Kelley, that the IRS exerts undue
>> influence on  every judge  who is  also a  taxpayer.   Go figure!
>> Count six:  extortion (NOT a change in doctrine!)
>> 
>> Delving even  deeper  into  this  putrid  swamp  of  self-serving
>> traitors,  we   find  that   the  IRS  is  also  bribing  federal
>> prosecutors to the tune of $25,000 for each indictment which they
>> obtain  from   federal  grand  juries,  against  the  President's
>> political enemies.  Would you have us believe that federal judges
>> have remained  completely above  this criminal practice?  Perhaps
>> you do  need to  be reminded  here, lest you conveniently forget,
>> that  Congress   abolished   the   Performance   Management   and
>> Recognition System in 1993, whereas the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986
>> remains on the books (see Title 41, U.S.C., sections 51 et seq.).
>> When was  the last  time you  completed the  financial disclosure
>> which is required of you by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978?
>> Count seven:  bribery.
>> 
>> And now,  we get  to the  meat of  this matter.   Your efforts to
>> prevent the  truth from emerging in these various show trials are
>> now  becoming  too  painfully  obvious,  even  to  less  educated
>> Americans.   General Partin, a demolition expert in the Pentagon,
>> has already  proven that  the structural  I-beams in  the  Murrah
>> building were  severed, most  likely by  plastic explosives which
>> were drilled  into the  bearing columns  and then  exploded  with
>> pressure-sensitive detonators.   That  famous  bullshit  bomb  of
>> which you  are so  fond, did its job quite well -- the shock wave
>> triggered the  deaths  of  numerous  innocent  children,  not  to
>> mention all  the adults  who lost  their lives  as well.   What a
>> coincidence that  ATF personnel  were conveniently  gone on  that
>> terrible day, at that precise moment!
>> 
>> Isn't it a shame, that you too were not in the Murrah building at
>> that precise  moment, so  that you  could now  provide us with an
>> exacting eyewitness  account of how explosive bullshit has become
>> in America.
>> 
>> Bullshit, Matsch.  You're no match for it, and it's all over your
>> face, leaving  permanent stains  on your  eyes,  ears,  nose  and
>> throat.  The other stains -- the ones on your soul -- will remain
>> there, forever indelible, forever yours.
>> 
>> 
>> Irreverently submitted,
>> 
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> 
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>> Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
>> Counselor at Law, and Private Attorney General
>> 
>> copy:  the Internet
>> 
>> 
>>                              #  #  #
>> 
>> ===========================================================================
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
>> B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
>> tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
>> email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
>> website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
>>              Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
>>              Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
>> _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
>> ======================================================================== 12
>> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail