Time: Fri Dec 12 17:44:24 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00640
	for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:18:56 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA18143;
	Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:21:35 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd018091; Fri Dec 12 17:21:26 1997
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:08:47 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: In Their Own Words: Journalists and Bias (fwd)

<snip>
>
>In Their Own Words: Journalists and Bias
>
>Introduction
>
>How much store should Americans put in the media's protestations that
>political bias has nothing to do with what comes out of newsrooms? Time and
>again, at Accuracy in Media, we hear the refrain, "I might have my own
>opinions, but they do not affect what I report." Oh, bosh. Few reporters can
>put their prejudices aside when they sit down before a word processor or
>stand before a microphone. Furthermore, many prominent journalists have the
>professional honesty to admit just that.
>Following is a sample of statments from journalists themselves about how
>bias does play a role in news coverage, and the cavalier attitude too many
>news organizations towards fairness. Accuracy in Media intends to update
>this compilation from time to time, so your contributions are invited. Post
>them either on the AIM site or send them directly to me at
>JosephG894@AOL.COM.
>
>--Joseph C. Goulden
>Director of Media Analysis
>Accuracy in Media
>
>Richard Harwood, former assistant managing editor and ombudsman, The
>Washington Post, Op Ed column, 8 March 1996:
>
>"American journalists--probably a majority--try with varying degrees of
>success to keep their partisan allegiances out of their work. But the
>journalist without those allegiances is rare indeed, as every poll and
>sociological study of the work force has confirmed. In nearly half a century
>in the news business, I have never known a political writer, for example,
>who was 'indifferent' to the outcome of a presidential election. And the
>major newspaper that has no social and community values, values that are
>expressed in what it chooses to print and not to print, is a very rare
>institution."
>
>Harwood, Op Ed column, Washington Post, 28 October 1990:
>
>"You are not 'entitled' to a letter to the editor,to an op-ed piece or even
>to a paid advertisement; if we don't like it, we don't print it. to ask for
>'equal time' on the evening news or in the morning newspaper is, very often,
>to bay at the moon. You have no 'right' to fair treatment, no 'right' to be
>quoted accurately or in context or even quoted at all in news reports,
>broadcasts, or commentaries....If your reputation is soiled in a front-page
>story under a four-column hadline, it is most unlikely to be cleansed in the
>same spot (if it is cleansed at all)."
>
>Evan Thomas, Washington bureau chief, Newsweek Magazine, on Inside
>Washington, 11 May 1996:'
>
>Commenting on Speaker Newt Gingrich's charge that the media are biased,,
>Thomas stated, "This is true. There is liberal bias. About 85 percent of the
>reporters who cover the White House vote Democratic. They have for a long
>time. Particularly at the networks, at the lower levels, among the editors
>and the so-called infrastructure, there is a liberal bias. There is a
>liberal bias at Newsweek, the magazine I work for."
>
>Bernard Goldberg, CBS News correspondent, The Wall Street Journal, Op Ed
>piece, 13 February 1986:
>
>"There are lots of reasons fewer people are watching network news, and one
>of them, I'm more convinced than ever, is that our viewers simply don't
>trust us. And for good reason.
>"The old argument that the networks 5and other 'media elites' have a liberal
>bias is so blatantly true that it's hardly worth discussing anymore. No, we
>don't sit around in dark corners and plan strategies on how we're going to
>slant the news. We don't have to. It comes naturally to most reporters."
>
>Page two
>
>The Freedom Forum/Roper Center survey of 139 Washington-based bureau chiefs
>and congressional correspondents, April 1996.
>Question #49: How would you characterize your political orientation?
>22 % Liberal
>39 % Liberal to Moderate
>30 % Moderate
>7 % Moderate to Conservative
>2 % Conservative
>Question #53: Did you vote for Bill Clinton, George Bush, Ross Perot, or
>some other candidate?
>89 % Bill Clinton
>7 % George Bush
>2 % Ross Perot
>2 % Other
>
<snip>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail