Time: Sat Dec 13 17:57:48 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA09487
	for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 18:01:11 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp04.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA17337
	for [address in tool bar]; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 17:59:09 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpd017310; Sat Dec 13 17:58:53 1997
          by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
	  id QAA16033; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 16:55:13 -0800
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id QAA33474 for <repub-d@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 16:55:09 -0800
          by mx3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
	  id QAA18431 for <repub-d@u.washington.edu>; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 16:55:05 -0800
	by smtp01.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA12891;
	Sat, 13 Dec 1997 17:33:29 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp01.primenet.com, id smtpd012833; Sat Dec 13 17:33:22 1997
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 17:32:59 -0800
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
To: "New Republican Discussion List" <repub-d@u.washington.edu>
Subject: SLS: Delphi at RAND (a corporation!)

The Delphi Technique was debunked at the
University of California, Irvine, when
an unknown student of applied mathematics
found a hidden "mirror" in their decision
matrix, proving predictable bias in their
otherwise innocuous but politically
provocative methodology.  Thus, proving
once again, you can drag a dead horse to
water, but the well may be dry, by the 
time you get there.  This necessary result
was mentioned briefly only in the last
footnote, which nobody ever read anyway.

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress

At 05:44 PM 12/13/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Here's aan example of the type of literature you can obtain fron the folks
>DOCNO: R-1283-PR
>TITLE: Delphi Assessment: Expert Opinion, Forecasting, and Group Process.
>AUTH: H. Sackman
>PAGES: 125,    DATE: 1974    COST: $ 10.00
>KEYS: Delphi method 
>ABST: A critical analysis and evaluation of the Delphi technique, a 
>systematic method for eliciting
>expert opinion on a variety of topics. The author examines the
>principles and key
>assumptions of Delphi in the light of current standards for social 
>experimentation, test design,
>sampling, use of experts, and interpretation of findings. He concludes that 
>conventional Delphi is an
>unreliable and scientifically unvalidated technique in principle and
>in practice. Except for its
>possible value as an informal exercise for heuristic purposes, Delphi should 
>be replaced by
>demonstrably superior, scientifically rigorous questionnaire techniques and 
>associated experimental
>procedures using human subjects. Users are urged to work with 
>psychometrically trained social
>scientists who can apply rigorous techniques tailored to specific needs. 
>Delphi should not be used
>until its principles, methods, and fundamental applications can be 
>established experimentally as
>scientifically tenable. 125 pp. Bibliog. 
>           Add This Item to Order List  |  View/Change Order List  |  Place 
>To subscribe or unsubscribe, email:
>     majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com
>with the message:
>     subscribe ignition-point email@address
>     unsubscribe ignition-point email@address

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail