Time: Sat Dec 13 18:06:50 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA10914
for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 18:05:33 -0700 (MST)
by smtp01.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA14399;
Sat, 13 Dec 1997 17:41:28 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp01.primenet.com, id smtpd014364; Sat Dec 13 17:41:21 1997
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 17:41:02 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: THEIR DEFINITION OF THE "TRUTH" IS 'DIFFERENT'...
<snip>
>
>From: "Henry Ayre" <henri@alaska.net>
>
>I have just finished reading THE DOWNING OF TWA FLIGHT 800 by James
>Sanders, Zebra Books, 1977. It's a book that is difficult to put down once
>you begin, and it takes only sever hours to read. Since it costs only $7
>(pocketbook format) it recommends itself on two points immediately. But
>beyond that, I found it was impossible NOT to believe that, with so many
>individual factual elements that fit together so nicely, I was reading the
>truth and the whole truth of the disaster. In any analysis of a complex
>event, if the observer finds just three elements that indisputably fit
>together in a certain fashion then he has a firm grip on the large picture
>of what happened. Author Sanders presents to the reader not three but
>dozens of elements of the Flight 800 disaster which fit together nicely.
>The only questions that are left would be less than consequential details.
>The cause of the crash is named.
>
>But beyond solving the story of the demise of Flight 800, Sanders book puts
>the spotlight on the mind-blowing perfidy of the Federal government, taken
>as a whole. In the first month, Federal investigators knew by the physical
>evidence what had brought the 747 crashing into the ocean. Yet, they (in
>the person of one FBI Kallstrom) lied directly to the American public. It
>was claimed that they had NO idea what brought the plane down, later that
>it DEFINITELY was NOT a bomb or a missile. The lying was done looking into
>the TV camera, to be reiterated by all the main talking heads of the
>nation's major TV news chains. This lying has been done with great emphasis
>and resonance, as if to say, "This IS the truth... trust us!"
>
>But it wasn't the truth. Many of those so bombastically declared it to be
>the truth KNEW it wasn't the truth, thus were guilty of public lying, a
>capital offense in my opinion. Others simply reiterated mindlessly the
>leitmotif of the grand authorities who knew damned well that they were
>lying. These mindless ones should be banished to some cold dank rocky
>island to keep company with salmon, seagulls, and brown bear until the end
>of their days.
>
>It becomes clear that this whole powerful and complex engine of Federal
>government lying is not something that just happened to pop up at the time
>of the Flight 800 disaster. Indeed, we can think of many times in previous
>instances where the government marshalled its forces with astounding speed
>and purpose to manufacture a 'truth' favourable to its image. So how long
>has all this lying been going on. Apparently a very very long time. AND WHO
>ARE THE PRINCIPLE LIARS? In general, all politicians, save a very few. The
>higher up the food chain of lies the more successful they are as
>politicians.
>
>One thing should be perfectly clear. The Federal government does not hold
>the same definition of 'the truth' as do the average citizens of this
>country. For us the truth is a precise and complete recitation of events of
>the past, which recitation may or not be to our benefit. For the Federal
>government the truth is a recitation of events of the past which is part
>true, part fiction, part distorsion, and part silence on real elements of
>the situation. The result is ALWAYS a story that will do maximum good/
>minimum harm to the power and grandeur of the government. This to the
>centrists (both big AND small) IS the truth because the central government
>to them IS the essence of the country. To harm the central government by
>saying something detrimental to it is "untrue" because (to the centrists)
>it jeopardizes the safety of the government. If this appears to you to be
>tortured reasoning you are not alone.
>
>Reading Sanders book--which I strongly recommend--convinces the average
>American that he has a real problem with the Federal government. That
>problem might even become as personal as the safety of the commercial
>jetliner he boards so innocently. H. Ayre.
>
<snip>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail