Time: Mon Dec 15 11:47:38 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11729
	for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 11:49:56 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp02.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA04500
	for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 11:45:32 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpd004437; Mon Dec 15 11:45:12 1997
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 11:45:58 -0700
To: "Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr." <spg@c-zone.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: Butte County Citizens Denied Right to see their own Grand Jury

See Hawks v. County of Butte et al.,
now loaded in the Supreme Law Library,
at the URL just below my name here:

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com


At 09:53 AM 12/15/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Dear Paul:
>
>FYI
>
>Sincerely,
>RLCII
>SPG
>--------------------------------
>>Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 21:43:56
>>To: RNC
>>From: "Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr." <spg@c-zone.net>
>>Subject: Butte County Citizens Denied Right to see their own Grand Jury
>>
>>>Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 21:28:38
>>>To: CBS News, EagleFlight, Fathers Rights, Judicial Watch, CBS News,
>EagleFlight, Fathers Rights, John Burr, John Knight, Judicial Watch, Mens
>Hotline, Monica Hoeft-Ross, Paul Andrew Mitchel Sui Juris
>>>From: "Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr." <spg@c-zone.net>
>>>Subject: Butte County Citizens Denied Right to see their own Grand Jury
>>>
>>>Dear People,
>>>
>>>Seasons salutations upon these holidays.
>>>
>>>I bring you news here from a corrupt county here in Northern California,
>named Butte County.  We have Judges whom do drugs, such as "Cocaine Anne",
>we have an arrogant cabal of Lawyers and Police and Sheriff, District
>Attorney's, and Supervisors whom are complicit in their greed and
>illegalities.  All these people for such a small county, are in charge of an
>Empire, of Jails, Courts and county services that belie the true
>representation of the funds and wealth in this county.  Clearly, the people
>of Butte County cannot afford the muscle-bound Superstructure that now
>terrorizes our lives.  It is way too big, and has way too much power (BEWARE
>OF THE COMING 'CONSOLIDATED COURTS' THAT WILL SOON BE COMING TO YOU!) and
>clearly no longer defines the interests of the people of this county it
>pretends to represent.
>>>
>>>Please understand, that the main goal of "Law Enforcement" has changed,
>from that of trying to stop crime, to that of 'random TAX collection' by a
>host of armed officers, Peace Officers and other state Agents and Actors.
>From this, those noble people of this county that have dared to stand up and
>stop this corruption, this evil--have been insanely persecuted by a system
>clearly out of control.  When you come to Butte County, you clearly pass
>through the looking glass into something 'unknown' where in law, up is down
>and down is up.
>>>
>>>All these person's whom are employed by the system plead: "I'm only doing
>my job..." as they implement their injustice.  This happened to me recently
>when I had my car "seized" for not having a drivers license nor registation.
>(The state has invented me into a 'Deadbeat Dad').  Those Sheriff Officers
>so arrogantly stealing my property that day, said the same thing "That they
>were only doing there job."
>>>
>>>When I informed them that their job required them to take an oath of
>office to a higher law, and uphold and defend that, they rhetorted that the
>State Legislature's law required them to steal the car, and that The
>California Governor Pete Wilson authorized the theft of my property.  They
>would not hear about any "Right to Travel".
>>>
>>>I quoted the law from them, such as Marbury v. Madison, that stated "any
>law which is repugnant to the constitution is null and void."  They
>discounted that.  I challenged them and asked them that 'IF' the Legislature
>passed a law demanding that they go door to door and pull Jews out of their
>homes and put them into ovens--whether they would do it.  In UNISON, all
>four Butte County Sheriff Deputies answered "YES!"
>>>
>>>I was stunned.
>>>
>>>For months now, perhaps more than a year, several people whom have been
>outlandishly persecuted, have desired to go in front of our Butte County
>Grand Jury to see them, have been denied seeing that body.  I personally
>have written three letters demanding to meet the Grand Jury.  Only one has
>been answered with "We have no jurisdiction in this matter."  (This was in
>regards to a case "The Brady-Dayton Cumbuss case" where a young 18 year-old
>black man was killed in the Butte County jail.  This jail is infamous for
>its beatings and jail deaths.)  All other letters have been unanswered.
>>>
>>>We have found that other citizens have also not had their letters answered
>from the Butte County grand jury.
>>>
>>>We know from a former Grand Jury member who stated that when they were
>disbanding, and just about to let a 'new' grand jury into session, the Grand
>Jury Foreman came in with a box, of opened letters saying "Oh, we got these
>and didn't know what to do with them, but since this grand jury is almost
>over--well--I guess they're not important."  We have knowledge that the D.A.
>is opening those letters, and the result clearly is that American citizens
>are being prohibited from seeing their own grand juries through imposition
>of 'PROCESS' which is being used to clearly impede people from accessing
>their own grand jury.
>>>
>>>We have also found out that the DA has a death grip upon our grand jury.
>Intimidating them not to prosecute individuals.  
>>>
>>>There were about ten people that went to see the Grand Jury after they had
>sent letters which had not been answered; at their meeting place of the
>Butte County Superior court in Oroville California.  The grand jury was
>immediately sequestered and surrounded by Sheriff Bailiffs, who escorted
>them.  Three people pleaded "We want to meet with you." and were rebuffed by
>silence from the Grand Jury.  One Bailiff surly responded "You have to be
>invited to see the Grand Jury."  The Grand Jury was quickly put into a
>court, then the doors locked behind them.  No citizen saw the grand jury
>that day.
>>>
>>>We met in the Law Library with a gentleman from this area's largest
>newspaper "The Enterprize Record" (530-891-1234)...we spoke with this
>reporter for almost four hours.  We showed him the law, especially West
>Virginia ex rel. Clarence Thomas MILLER W.Va. 285 S.E. 2nd 500 which clearly
>states that the citizen has the right to see the Grand Jury upon application
>to a Circuit Judge.
>>>
>>>Clearly, we can see, and have pragmatic proof that the Grand Jury has
>become no more than a "Homage Jury" to the District Attornies across this
>nation.  No longer are they available for "immediate access" by American
>citizens.  The 'immediate access' is only granted to the DA's, not to
>citizens.  IF the citizen dares go after the DA or other government official
>or state actors--he is clearly impeded by the system itself.
>>>
>>>Please note, that many patriots, fathers and other citizens seeking
>redress and justice by Common-Law or Constitutional means have been
>chastized for taking such pro-active means. Militia's have been also
>admonished...however; they have been stated these things and pleaded with us
>to "use the present system's of redress".  Well, many American citizens have
>gone to their courts, they have written amd met (if they were allowed to)
>their local Representitives, Congressman; they have written their Supreme
>Court, the President to the United States.  We have tried EVERYTHING.  Now
>we entreat our own Grand Jury and they will not meet with us?  They throw
>'process' before us to impede us?
>>>
>>>Clearly there is an ever growing realization that THERE ARE NO LONGER
>SYSTEM'S OF REDRESS.  That in fact, the courts are a facade, an outright LIE
>whose only remaining duty is to maintain a facade of "LAW"--when in fact
>they are an outright Organized Crime Syndicate imposing unlawful crimes
>against their own people.  This cannibalism is intolerable, and now, in
>'using systems of redress' and pleading with a silent Grand Jury in which to
>only meet with them which is every American citizens right, they refute our
>requests?
>>>
>>>Clearly, the time has come to take a hard look at the inequity and the
>reality of the fact that we have a government that is out of control,
>holding a death-grip upon all processes of law to only impose succinct
>injustice.  Those of us whom have implored reason from our Sheriff's,
>Police, DA's and courts; may have been making overtures to an outright lie.
>Clearly--there is no substantial law remedy for those whom are attacked by
>the same people whom dare swear an oath to protect us.
>>>
>>>Clearly, the citizens of Butte County whom demand something which clearly
>belongs to the citizen and NOT the DA, MUST be allowed to see the Grand
>Jury, and SHOULD have been welcomed to that body.  The realization and fact
>that we weren't shows that something is disasterously wrong.  If anything,
>the DA should be having such problems in meeting with the Grand Jury, not we
>the Citizens.  
>>>
>>>The Grand Jury is clearly an arm of the people to watch over and correct
>GOVERNMENT...not the other way around.  
>>>
>>>We are going after corrupt person's in Government, and we demand to see
>our own grand jury.
>>>
>>>We will keep you posted as to our success.  
>>>
>>>This is a VERY important story, for it indeed goes to the core of the
>engineering of the construct of how we are governed and how the
>infrastructure of governance works.  This conundrum we are presented with,
>goes to the foundational core of this nations very being.  If we cannot go
>to our grand jury--this means that something is terribly wrong, and very
>much astray with our Government.  With what the four officers stated above
>about obeying the State Legislature in pulling Jews out of there homes and
>placing them into ovens, clearly shows--this is one time we need immediate
>access to our own Grand Juries...not the other way around.
>>>
>>>Wish us luck.
>>>
>>>Sincerely,
>>>Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr.
>>>The Sovereign Patriot Group
>>>c/o 1617 1/2 Mulberry
>>>Chico, California Republic 
>>>                        PZ 95928
>>>e-mail= spg@c-zone.net
>>>(530) 899-9342
>>>
>>>===========================================================================
>>>
>>
>
>
>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail