Time: Mon Dec 15 14:05:39 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA20735
for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:56:11 -0700 (MST)
by smtp02.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA02334;
Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:41:46 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpd002270; Mon Dec 15 13:41:26 1997
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:41:13 -0800
To: Ed <watchman@pacifier.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: wrong argument
The "emergency" is bogus, and you know it.
/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com
At 12:11 PM 12/15/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:06:46 -0800
>>Gentlemen,
>>
>>It appears to me that although everyone has this legal knowledge showing
>>that there is no way the IRS has any Jurisdiction over the People, and
>that it is voluntary; i must add.... it is voluntary, and that most are
>volunteering.
>>None of the Arguements disputed by Mr. Becraft entailed a venue arguement
>over the military jurisdiction of the commander in chief. The IRS is
>enforcing corporate statute over the people only when they engage in the
>venue designated by the commander in chief under the current State of
>Emergency. Do not believe for a minute, that i have not noticed the lack of
>mention of this vital aspect, by the "most knowledgeable patriot attorney
>in the country".
>>
>>
>>>>If this whole thing didn't pertain solely to corporations, then why was
>>>>the correcting amendment signed by the CORPORATE unit ???
>>>>
>>>>Rusty
>>>> Now from the above who is the "resident" in 1.1-1? Is the United
>States "at home?" Is a "resident" having a PERMANENT address located "at
>home" in Title 26 USC 7701a (39) if he can't be found "abroad" as stated in
>Subdivision 1 of the 1913 Income Statute on page 166? Doesn't that apply
>only to federal workers who are in a trade or business as noted in 26 USC
>162? Do not these employees operate "abroad" in the foreign States as
>representatives of Congress and not the people?
>>
>>
>>This is where the story jumps the track. What and when and where, anything
>occured in the 1800's
>>as a building block, does not explain the Venue of the Jurisdiction of the
>current democratic
>>United States, which is bankrupt and acting under treaty requirements of
>the International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. 22 USC 286
>>
>>It is the Home Address and Voluntary Acts, of a Resident, that makes them
>a resident in the first place. One must Identify the Venue, of the
>Jurisdiction, and it is contained below:
>>
>>NATIONAL EMERGENCY: (as defined in Black's Law Dictionary) A state of
>national crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary national
>or federal action. Congress has made little or no distinction between a
>"state of national emergency" and a "state of war". Brown v. Bernstein,
>D.C.Pa., 49 F.Supp. 728, 732.
>>
>>In 1973, in Senate Report 93-549, the first sentence reads:
>>
>>"Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of
>declared national emergency."
>>
>>"This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to
>rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes.
>Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize
>property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities;
>assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all
>transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private
>enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control
>the lives of all American citizens"
>>
>>so the only argument, is that you do not fall within its grasp! otherwise
>it is martial law, and that is why the constituional arguement is vague.
>Not because it is incorrect, rather it is misapplied, and applied to late
>in the situation.
>>
>>The only original constitutional question in the authority of the United
>States, is the Venue of its Authority, and going off to the subject matter
>of the Jurisdiction invalidates the previous arguement, in the eyes of the
>Judge;
>>Who uses a commercial admiralty courtroom to preside over all matters of
>Individual, corporate, civil, and constitutional legal matters. It is the
>silence about the Venue, and court procedures, where rather than inform and
>protect the public the Judge gets a quick word for his proof of Venue, and
>the authority of that Military flag hanging there by order of the Commander
>in Chief of the United States, is enforced. And the Elite Patriot espouses
>his Constitutional Rights,
>>God Granted... which do not apply to Caesars kingdom, for Caesar thinks He
>is god.
>>
>>WHAT IS THE VENUE OF THE UNITED STATES???
>>12 USC Section 95(b) reads:
>>"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations
>heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the
>President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March
>the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of
>Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended [12 USCS Sec. 95a],
>are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title I, Sec. 1, 48
>Stat. 1.)".
>>
>>Wherein Roosevelt wrote:
>>
>>"I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that
>a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These
>measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its
>experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to
>bring to speedy adoption. But in the event that the Congress shall fail to
>take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency
>is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will
>then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument
>to meet the crisis broad Executive power to wage a war against the
>emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in
>fact invaded by a foreign foe."
>>
>>On March the 5th, President Roosevelt asked for a special and
>extraordinary session of Congress in Proclamation 2038. He called for the
>special session of Congress to meet on March the 9th at noon. And at that
>Congress, he presented a bill, an Act, to provide for relief in the
>existing national emergency in banking and for other purposes.
>>
>>In the enabling portion of that Act it states:
>>
>>"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the
>United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby
>declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively
>necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national
>application."
>>
>>In the Act of March 9, 1933, it further states in Title 1, Section 1:
>>
>>"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations
>heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the
>President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March
>the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of
>Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved
>and confirmed."
>>
>>This is the exact same wording as is found today in Title 12, USC 95 (b).
>The language in Title 12, USC 95 (b) is exactly the same as that found in
>the Act of March 9, 1933, Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1. The
>Act of March 9, 1933, is still in full force and effect today. We are still
>under the Rule of Necessity. We are still in a declared state of national
>emergency, a state of emergency which has existed, uninterrupted, since
>1933, almost sixty five years.
>>
>>The Act of October 6, 1917, states that this was:
>>
>>"An Act To define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for
>other purposes."
>>
>>In Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933,
>>
>>"Subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L.
>411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows;"
>>
>>"During time of war or during any other period of national emergency
>declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that be
>may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such
>rules and regulations as be may prescribe, by means of licenses or
>otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit
>between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and
>export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion
>or currency, by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to
>the jurisdiction thereof".
>>
>>From now on; as far as commercial, monetary or business transactions were
>concerned, the people of the United States were no longer differentiated
>from any other enemy of the United States.
>>
>>So Go Ahead, present your constitutional arguments that justify how a
>United States resident; with a United States Regional Postal Mailing
>Address and Emergency Services Number, most with a SSN registration number
>(number of a man)
>>that is involved in commercial credit, and is basically forced to use the
>military script Roosevelt required, will argue his constitutional rights to
>prevent this Jurisdiction, when i have not ever seen anything written by Mr
>Becraft or any others warning about this Venue.
>>
>>First, even if this venue does apply to you, make them prove it!
>>Why is it so hard, to stand on your Venue Constitutional arguement?
>>Oh that's right, you've got rights to talk about.
>>If they would ever actually show your drivers license record, as a venue,
>>or your check book, or your 9 digit regional address... then you could go
>after the constitutionality of the emergency, and all the other arguements,
>signature nom deguerre, etc on that document! However even the correct
>arguements applied by Mr Becraft, need to be applied to a Bill of
>Particulars, to the venue arguement only, and pushed through to the Supreme
>Court, if nescessary.
>>
>>If they do not show you this document as evidence of venue, or the officer
>testifying you were in the venue, they have no case at law.
>>
>>In the other case, Mr John Citizen, at address, City, Federal zone
>>in his identification, has already proven the venue and his arguement
>about documents not in evidence is irrelevant. once the jurisdiction of the
>United States is in effect, your rights are no longer relevant to the
>staute except
>>as approved in the United States Code.
>>
>>I am amazed to see the progress, and research done by you folks at bringing
>>up all the discrepancies in these agencies and their tyranny. Maybe it is
>the
>>work done by Mr Becraft, Mr Wangrud, Mr Schiff, and on and on,... that has
>created the havoc in the IRS now, and the house of cards is shaky at best.
>>Either way, they do intend to crash the system, and let you re-volunteer
>>to enter the cashless system, course, most are there now i guess. You
>gonna make em prove the National ID card there in your wallet, so you can
>buy groceries, or cash your check, is a God given right also?
>>
>>Since the Venue which creates Jurisdiction had to be in operation at the
>time of the Statute Violation, how does going to court give a venue that
>must have not existed at the time of statute. It is when the State acts
>without venue to him that is without the kingdom of the State, that the
>Laws of God, will be employed to End this Captivity. Since 1933 and through
>to 70 years shall God's people
>>be under the yoke of their Earthly master. By then you will not buy nor
>sell without the Venue of the Beast. A wild Statement proven by 3 documents.
>>
>>1. Public Law 104-208 sec 656, 657. The national ID card Sept 30, 1996
>>
>>2. The Electronic Funds Transfer Expansion Act of 1996. Cashless US, Apr
>30, 96
>>
>>3. Executive Order 12938 (Be ready for 12919, when the real suspension of
>Habeus
>>Corpus occurs)
>>
>>THE WHITE HOUSE
>>
>>Office of the Press Secretary
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>
>>For Immediate Release November 12, 1997
>>
>>CONTINUATION OF EMERGENCY REGARDING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
>>
>>On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, I declared a national
>emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the
>national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed
>by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons ("weapons
>of mass destruction") and the means of delivering such weapons. Because
>the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of
>delivering them continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the
>national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the
>national emergency declared on November 14, 1994, and extended on November
>14, 1995 and November 14, 1996, must continue in effect beyond November 14,
>1997.
>>
>>Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies
>Act (50 U.S.C. 622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency declared in
>Executive Order 12938.
>>
>>This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to
>the Congress.
>>
>>THE WHITE HOUSE, WILLIAM J. CLINTON
>>November 12, 1997.
>>
>>
>>Attached is my Argument for Emergency Martial Law rule.
>>EO 12919 is available by request.
>>
>>Amazing what the Spirit of God reveals to those that Do His Will.
>>
>>
>> May God bless you with his Grace
>>
>> Ed
>>
>Communist Party directive issued in 1943: "Members and front organizations
>must continually embarrass, discredit and degrade our critics.... When
>obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist or Nazi or
>anti-Semitic [or Patriot extremists].... Constantly associate those who
>oppose us with those names that already have a bad smell. The association
>will, after enough repetition, become "fact" in the public mind." -- 1956
>Report of the House Committee on Un-American Activities (volume 1, page 347)
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail