Time: Tue Dec 16 04:52:34 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA24126
	for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 04:47:39 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp01.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA28744
	for [address in tool bar]; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 04:47:43 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp01.primenet.com, id smtpd028740; Tue Dec 16 04:47:40 1997
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 04:48:21 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar]
Subject: SLS: Butte County Citizens Denied Right to see their own Grand
   Jury (fwd)

>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 21:03:57 -0800
>To: PangK <PangK@aol.com>
>From: "Robert Lindsay; Cheney Jr." <spg@c-zone.net>
>Subject: Re: Butte County Citizens Denied Right to see their own Grand
>  Jury
>Cc: livewire@sunset.net, publiceye@cbs.com, exegesis@sm.org,
>        "Divorced Fathers' Healing Children" <doppler@astral.magic.ca>,
>        "Dean Tong" <DeanTong@aol.com>, "David Guthrie"
>        "BCSay" <bcsay@ncweb.com>, "Edgar J. Boucree, Jr."
>        "David Malish MD" <asthma3@ix.netcom.com>,
>        "Roy A. Getting" <rag@airmail.net>, <bing@tiac.net>,
>        "Dan McLaughlin" <cxdz36a@prodigy.com>, "claes" <gilclaes@oricom.ca>,
>        "Zosmom" <Zosmom@aol.com>, "Russ Abbott" <abbott@aero.org>,
>        "Larry Allen" <rfox@southeast.net>, "laducas" <laducas@juno.com>,
>        <kissodat@somtel.com>, "Thomas Burbo" <tburbo@together.net>,
>        <SteveW407@aol.com>, "Steve Woodrow" <woody@stlnet.com>,
>        <MmpcMaven@aol.com>, <proadvocate@earthlink.net>, <PangK@aol.com>,
>        <NMAR85@aol.com>, "'Kevin Sheahen'" <panzertrup@aol.com>,
>        "Jodi Carlsen" <Jodi@whitakercos.com>, <HARCdlm@aol.com>,
>        "Gordon Wynn-Green" <dadwatch@robin.no>,
>        "dr. cadvan griffiths" <cadvan@aol.com>,
>        <dizzywave-southphilly@worldnet.att.net>, <danat@jps.net>,
>        <bill.cassady@infoway.com>, <bernie@quadro.net>,
>        "Paul Rozeboom" <paulcpa@earthlink.net>,
>        "Walter H. Schneider" <sheep_@telusplanet.net>,
>        "Alia Darrow" <aliadarrow@earthlink.net>,
>        "A2ndWife" <A2ndwife@aol.com>, "Mens Hotline" <men@menhotline.org>,
>        "Gregory J. Palumbo Ph.D." <gregory-palumbo@uokhsc.edu>,
>        "Milton Witty" <acesco@colla.com>,
>        "Monica Hoeft-Ross" <bosemietze@powernet.net>,
>        john.burr@eonetworks.com, manifesto@home.net, jwatch@erols.com,
>        men@menhotline.org, bosemietze@powernet.net, supremelaw@ibm.net,
>        info@rnc.org
>Dear PangK,
>We have used lawyers, and are familiar with them.  What we have seen is that
>factually, they are flaccid, devious, non-representative arm of the
>organized crime syndicate in which we are going after.
>Anyone asking a lawyer to join them in any cause is like asking a local Wise
>Guy to help you fight his own organized crime mafia.
>There can be NO disputing of these facts.  In fact, not just the henious
>facts and figures which show massive losses to average citizens entering
>within the present court systems of this nation; not only the clear facts
>and figures that show that money (See O.J. Simpson, Michael Jackson, and a
>host of other 'rich' criminal causes that turned out quite differently from
>the reality that would have transpired if they were poor, these people would
>have been slammed into jail a long time ago) money is the only 'real' law
>within our court system; not only the clear explosion of Pro Se litigants
>whom after decades of being plummelled by this corrupt Organized Crime
>Syndicate/System that the ABA runs through  and by collusion of its lawyers;
>not only the fact, hidden to most litigants whom hire lawyers that his
>'defender' in fact is an officer of the court and has homage and fealty to
>that court; not only by the fact, that if lawyers worked, especially in
>Fathers Rights, amounst a host of other causes--that most of these
>government applied tyrannies NEVER would have occurred in the first place!;
>not only by the clear facts and figures that Social "Judicial Activist" /
>Imperial "Judges" are upholding clearly Unconstitutional laws and action,
>and defiantly are protecting themselves and other government tyrants through
>illegal "Immunity" cliams; not only by the fact that lawyers pervert the law
>and do not voraciously attack the system, not only to defeat it, but totally
>collapse and eradicate it which sometimes is needed, and during modern
>times--is ABSOLUTELY NEEDED...The facts are--getting a Lawyer is the worst
>thing any citizen can factually do to his case.
>And you want us to get a lawyer?!?  For what reason?
>It is most propable we are going to be over ruled, or proceedurally put
>aside anyways--why would we add MORE certainty to that fact by obtaining a
>Lawyer whom will not voraciously eradicate these perverted systems?  That
>will enjoin with the court to overcharge us, to take our monies, to
>malfeasantly drag the case along until that lawyer wears out the person he
>represents so that the case in fact NEVER ENTERS ANY COURT?
>Clearly, with the massive losses being suffered by the American public by
>this applied Government terrorism, we are clearly coming to a time where the
>realization clearly shows, that "IF" it is a most probable certainty that we
>are going to lose due to this illegal Organized Crime Syndicate--
>Why do we need lawyers?
>Why in fact do we even need Judges?!?
>The system is so corrupt--why do we need these entities if we are only to
>lose anyways?
>I say we face facts, and start cutting these maggot's out from their own
>sustinance.  Stop hiring lawyers, Stop giving Judges Salaries--starve this
>beast by any means--[for clearly logically proven reasons]; and these
>injustice will start to collapse, due to inadequate funds.
>No deference to you...but "IF" there were any true lawyers within this
>nation--most of these perversions would have never occurred in the first
>place.  The FACT that they have, clearly shows that these 'professional'
>people have clearly not done their job, they have no understanding of law;
>and/or they are malfeasant beyond reason.  These are the polite reasons as
>to why we will not obtain a 'vaunted' lawyer.
>If you don't like it, then I can start spouting facts and figures that start
>with 97.3% of wins being upheld by DA's across this nation for any 'crime.'
>(This is a 1990 figure, clearly closer to 100% by now).  Most
>Communist/Totalitarian regimes can only claim 99% success rate.
>AND--I would conjecture to say, that those 2.7% of citizen wins out of the
>97.3% citizen losses--I would make the supposition a good portion of those
>are due to Pro Se (non-lawyer) litigants and not the other way around.
>I mean really. Lets turn this paradigm around and place the same facts and
>figures on 'Lifeguards" per se.  Out of 100% going swimming, 97.3% drown?
>Would you 'think' it would take 40 years to figure out whether we need
>"Lifeguards" or not?
>So...all we are doing here is what any clear thinking citizen would do.
>They'd assure themselves the best percentage of winning, and clearly in
>these contemporary times, that can be best done WITHOUT  a Lawyer.
>Clearly, lawyers are being 'cut out of the loop'.  We keep this up, we might
>be able to get this country back.
>Wish us luck.
>We are getting 'zero' lawyers.  You are out of the loop.  We don't want your
>help anymore.  Trust me, you've 'helped' enough already.
>At 08:41 PM 12/15/97 EST, you wrote:
>>In a message dated 97-12-15 15:02:16 EST, you write:
>><< First, the idea that we have to use a lawyer to access what is lawfully
>> by birthright and ancient custom (See ex-rel Miller which gives but a small
>> history of the Grand Jury); is reprehensible.  We are trying to collapse
>> corrupt monopoly of the ABA.  We have  a right WITHOUT SEEKING A LAWYER to
>> see our own grand jury.  We will force this issue until they submit.
>>  >>
>>Well IF you are hell bent to bloody yourself, I can't talk you out of it.
>>a lawyer
>>who knows the ropes can do a better job for you.

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail