Time: Tue Dec 02 17:14:04 1997
To: Common Right Group <sj346280@4dcomm.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
References: <> <>

I asked you a simple question.

In answer to yours, yes, I am very
angry, because I am smack dab in
the middle of the kidnap racket,
and friends seem to become rather
scarce, rather quickly, upon learning 
what I do for a living, or, more
accurately, what I do in return for
systematic starvation inflicted by
the very people whom I have helped
with their litigation needs.

If you need to deflect people
on this subject, please don't
hesitate to refer them to the book
"The Franklin Cover-Up."  There is,
evidently, a lot of money to be
made from harvesting live organs;
just ask the Red Chinese Military.
Fetus parts are also appearing on
their restaurant menus, so cannibalism
is not a conspiracy theory, not by a
long shot.

If it were the only way I could stop
a 757 jet filled with abducted kids,
yes, I would grab a pick axe and
blow the front tires, even if that
might end up being rather risky, to me.
Too many people fail to understand
the emotions which motivate comments
of mine like that, and they wrongly 
choose to take them literally.

If you'd like to read my tempered follow-up,
I will be happy to share it with you.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

At 08:04 AM 12/1/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>> Do you have, or know, any children?
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://supremelaw.com
>> Sometimes we have a problem trying to figure out what yours is. Even the 
>most serious things can be said with an air of jest. Did you *assume* we 
>were attacking your post? If so, you owe yourself an appology and a 
>  Where did we say that we were not 199% behind your comments? Where did 
>we say we aren't equally as angry?
>  Will all of our anger bring those children back? What is the final 
>judgment going to look like? We think those children will be among those 
>who 'turn their backs' when the judgment is rendered on those who have 
>trespassed on the Life Liberty and Property Rights of Elohim's children 
>because they won't want to witness the anguish.That's the real meaning of 
>the "Joy" mentioned in the Scriptures - knowing with certainty the final 
>outcome. Selah.
>  Lighten up on your fellows and brothers Paul, lest you alienate those 
>who are in the same camp.
>  As to whether we have children or know any is nobody's business, 
>least of all in the public forum or subject to monitoring, lest they 
>should be used for levarage in an intimdation action. Yup. We're 
>paranoid also.

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail