Time: Thu Dec 04 16:38:35 1997
To: <jammin@u.washington.edu>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
Bcc: sls
References: <>

My apologies to you.

During this escalating crisis,
it is impossible for us to remain
neat and tidy, all the time.

I hope you can appreciate this.

Thanks in advance, for doing so.

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress

At 02:50 PM 12/4/97 -0800, you wrote:
>How many times are we going to get this?  Please send things only once.
>You clutter up people's mailboxes when you do this.
>"Wisdom is the perfect joining of creativity, logic, and truth."
>						-- The Wise Conservative
>On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>> [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>                                       c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
>>                                          Tucson [zip code exempt]
>>                                                  ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>>                                                 November 30, 1997
>> Mr. Richard Matsch
>> United States District Court
>> Federal Building
>> Denver, Colorado state
>> Subject:  Murdering Children to Save the Spies
>> Dear Mr. Matsch:
>> I am finally going to break my self-imposed silence on one of the
>> most heinous  acts of terrorism this nation has ever experienced.
>> I believe  that you,  sir, are  a traitor, and I am quite willing
>> and able to prove it.  I do so, herein.  Read on.
>> In my  several years  of specializing  in federal  law,  you  can
>> imagine my  shock one  day, when  I discovered  how easy  it  had
>> become to  rip any  federal indictment  into manifold  shreds  of
>> paper, without even reading to the second page.
>> Beginning at  the top, we usually find one or more U.S. ATTORNeys
>> listed as  having power(s)  of ATTORNey  to represent  the UNITED
>> STATES OF AMERICA (spelled in CAPITAL LETTERS, per force).  Title
>> 28 of the United States Code does not authorize U.S. ATTORNeys to
>> represent the  UNITED STATES  OF AMERICA,  but  only  the  United
>> States.  Count one:  misrepresentation.
>> To "ATTORN"  is to  supervise the  transfer of an estate from the
>> old lord  to the  new lord;  it is a term from feudal law.  Isn't
>> it interesting  how closely  the terms  "feudal" and "federal" do
>> sound, when  juxtaposed right next to each other?  The long chain
>> of coincidences does not stop here.  Keep reading!
>> Further on down the first page of any federal indictment, we then
>> find that  all criminal  prosecutions are commenced in the United
>> States District  Court ("USDC").   Unfortunately, the USDC has no
>> criminal jurisdiction  whatsoever.   This has  now been proven by
>> the utter  and demonstrable  silence by the Department of Justice
>> to several  Freedom of  Information Act ("FOIA") requests for the
>> statute(s), if  any, which  grant the  USDC original jurisdiction
>> over  criminal   prosecutions.    There  is  none.    Count  two:
>> deprivation of due process.
>> Reaching the  so-called real parties of interest now, these bogus
>> criminal actions  [sic] invariably  show  the  UNITED  STATES  OF
>> AMERICA as  the moving  Party, but  the Congress  of  the  United
>> States has  never granted  legal standing to the UNITED STATES OF
>> AMERICA to  sue, or  be sued,  in the  USDC.  It is true that the
>> United States  has been  granted standing  to sue, or be sued, in
>> the USDC, but the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the United States
>> [sic], are  not one  and the  same.  This you should have learned
>> way back in law school but, alas, they did not teach these things
>> in law  schools way  back when  you were  a student;   they still
>> don't teach these things in law schools.  Count three:  fraud.
>> The names  of criminal  defendants are likewise always spelled in
>> ALL CAPITAL  LETTERS, which  has now  been nailed  for invoking a
>> subtle, unconstitutional,  yes, even  criminal subterfuge whereby
>> martial rule  is impressed upon the People of America, in blatant
>> violation of  the prohibition against treason.  Evidently, I need
>> to remind  you that  one of  the penalties  for treason is death.
>> But, you  already  know  these  things,  correct?    Count  four:
>> treason (a capital offense).
>> Very  rarely,  however,  do  litigants  think  to  challenge  the
>> legality of  the body which issued these bogus indictments in the
>> first place.   You  probably do  not know how many times this has
>> already been done -- properly, timely, lawfully, and correctly --
>> because an  active conspiracy  is afoot, within the Department of
>> Just US, to obstruct any and all pleadings which nail the federal
>> Jury Selection  and Service  Act  for  blatant,  unconstitutional
>> discrimination against  Citizens of  the several  states.   Quite
>> simply, those  who are  qualified to  make law  in  America  are,
>> nevertheless, prevented  from serving  on grand and petit juries,
>> or from  voting in  general elections.   Those  who can  serve on
>> grand and  petit  juries,  or  vote  in  general  elections,  are
>> prevented by  Law from  serving in  any federal  elected offices.
>> Doesn't this strike you as strange?  Count five:  conspiracy.
>> All federal judges are also paying income taxes on their judicial
>> compensation, in  blatant violation  of the  prohibition  against
>> same which  is found in Article III.  This prohibition was upheld
>> in the  magnificent opinion of the Supreme Court in Evans v. Gore
>> in  1920.     Lately,  however,  our  august  Chief  Justice  has
>> confirmed, in  front of a graduate class in the Law School of the
>> University  of   Arizona,  that  "there  has  been  a  change  in
>> doctrine."   But, in  a rare  moment of  sanity, one  of your own
>> colleagues proved,  in Lord  v. Kelley, that the IRS exerts undue
>> influence on  every judge  who is  also a  taxpayer.   Go figure!
>> Count six:  extortion (NOT a change in doctrine!)
>> Delving even  deeper  into  this  putrid  swamp  of  self-serving
>> traitors,  we   find  that   the  IRS  is  also  bribing  federal
>> prosecutors to the tune of $25,000 for each indictment which they
>> obtain  from   federal  grand  juries,  against  the  President's
>> political enemies.  Would you have us believe that federal judges
>> have remained  completely above  this criminal practice?  Perhaps
>> you do  need to  be reminded  here, lest you conveniently forget,
>> that  Congress   abolished   the   Performance   Management   and
>> Recognition System in 1993, whereas the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986
>> remains on the books (see Title 41, U.S.C., sections 51 et seq.).
>> When was  the last  time you  completed the  financial disclosure
>> which is required of you by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978?
>> Count seven:  bribery.
>> And now,  we get  to the  meat of  this matter.   Your efforts to
>> prevent the  truth from emerging in these various show trials are
>> now  becoming  too  painfully  obvious,  even  to  less  educated
>> Americans.   General Partin, a demolition expert in the Pentagon,
>> has already  proven that  the structural  I-beams in  the  Murrah
>> building were  severed, most  likely by  plastic explosives which
>> were drilled  into the  bearing columns  and then  exploded  with
>> pressure-sensitive detonators.   That  famous  bullshit  bomb  of
>> which you  are so  fond, did its job quite well -- the shock wave
>> triggered the  deaths  of  numerous  innocent  children,  not  to
>> mention all  the adults  who lost  their lives  as well.   What a
>> coincidence that  ATF personnel  were conveniently  gone on  that
>> terrible day, at that precise moment!
>> Isn't it a shame, that you too were not in the Murrah building at
>> that precise  moment, so  that you  could now  provide us with an
>> exacting eyewitness  account of how explosive bullshit has become
>> in America.
>> Bullshit, Matsch.  You're no match for it, and it's all over your
>> face, leaving  permanent stains  on your  eyes,  ears,  nose  and
>> throat.  The other stains -- the ones on your soul -- will remain
>> there, forever indelible, forever yours.
>> Irreverently submitted,
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>> Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
>> Counselor at Law, and Private Attorney General
>> copy:  the Internet
>>                              #  #  #
>> ===========================================================================
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
>> B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
>> tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
>> email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
>> website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
>>              Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
>>              Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
>> _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
>> ======================================================================== 12
>> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail