Time: Thu Dec 04 16:38:35 1997 To: <jammin@u.washington.edu> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Murdering Children to Save the Spies Cc: Bcc: sls References: <3.0.3.16.19971204052951.2f072898@pop.primenet.com> My apologies to you. During this escalating crisis, it is impossible for us to remain neat and tidy, all the time. I hope you can appreciate this. Thanks in advance, for doing so. /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 02:50 PM 12/4/97 -0800, you wrote: >How many times are we going to get this? Please send things only once. >You clutter up people's mailboxes when you do this. > > >"Wisdom is the perfect joining of creativity, logic, and truth." > > -- The Wise Conservative > >On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote: > >> [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> >> >> c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 >> Tucson [zip code exempt] >> ARIZONA REPUBLIC >> >> November 30, 1997 >> Mr. Richard Matsch >> United States District Court >> Federal Building >> Denver, Colorado state >> >> Subject: Murdering Children to Save the Spies >> >> Dear Mr. Matsch: >> >> I am finally going to break my self-imposed silence on one of the >> most heinous acts of terrorism this nation has ever experienced. >> I believe that you, sir, are a traitor, and I am quite willing >> and able to prove it. I do so, herein. Read on. >> >> In my several years of specializing in federal law, you can >> imagine my shock one day, when I discovered how easy it had >> become to rip any federal indictment into manifold shreds of >> paper, without even reading to the second page. >> >> Beginning at the top, we usually find one or more U.S. ATTORNeys >> listed as having power(s) of ATTORNey to represent the UNITED >> STATES OF AMERICA (spelled in CAPITAL LETTERS, per force). Title >> 28 of the United States Code does not authorize U.S. ATTORNeys to >> represent the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, but only the United >> States. Count one: misrepresentation. >> >> To "ATTORN" is to supervise the transfer of an estate from the >> old lord to the new lord; it is a term from feudal law. Isn't >> it interesting how closely the terms "feudal" and "federal" do >> sound, when juxtaposed right next to each other? The long chain >> of coincidences does not stop here. Keep reading! >> >> Further on down the first page of any federal indictment, we then >> find that all criminal prosecutions are commenced in the United >> States District Court ("USDC"). Unfortunately, the USDC has no >> criminal jurisdiction whatsoever. This has now been proven by >> the utter and demonstrable silence by the Department of Justice >> to several Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests for the >> statute(s), if any, which grant the USDC original jurisdiction >> over criminal prosecutions. There is none. Count two: >> deprivation of due process. >> >> Reaching the so-called real parties of interest now, these bogus >> criminal actions [sic] invariably show the UNITED STATES OF >> AMERICA as the moving Party, but the Congress of the United >> States has never granted legal standing to the UNITED STATES OF >> AMERICA to sue, or be sued, in the USDC. It is true that the >> United States has been granted standing to sue, or be sued, in >> the USDC, but the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the United States >> [sic], are not one and the same. This you should have learned >> way back in law school but, alas, they did not teach these things >> in law schools way back when you were a student; they still >> don't teach these things in law schools. Count three: fraud. >> >> The names of criminal defendants are likewise always spelled in >> ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, which has now been nailed for invoking a >> subtle, unconstitutional, yes, even criminal subterfuge whereby >> martial rule is impressed upon the People of America, in blatant >> violation of the prohibition against treason. Evidently, I need >> to remind you that one of the penalties for treason is death. >> But, you already know these things, correct? Count four: >> treason (a capital offense). >> >> Very rarely, however, do litigants think to challenge the >> legality of the body which issued these bogus indictments in the >> first place. You probably do not know how many times this has >> already been done -- properly, timely, lawfully, and correctly -- >> because an active conspiracy is afoot, within the Department of >> Just US, to obstruct any and all pleadings which nail the federal >> Jury Selection and Service Act for blatant, unconstitutional >> discrimination against Citizens of the several states. Quite >> simply, those who are qualified to make law in America are, >> nevertheless, prevented from serving on grand and petit juries, >> or from voting in general elections. Those who can serve on >> grand and petit juries, or vote in general elections, are >> prevented by Law from serving in any federal elected offices. >> Doesn't this strike you as strange? Count five: conspiracy. >> >> All federal judges are also paying income taxes on their judicial >> compensation, in blatant violation of the prohibition against >> same which is found in Article III. This prohibition was upheld >> in the magnificent opinion of the Supreme Court in Evans v. Gore >> in 1920. Lately, however, our august Chief Justice has >> confirmed, in front of a graduate class in the Law School of the >> University of Arizona, that "there has been a change in >> doctrine." But, in a rare moment of sanity, one of your own >> colleagues proved, in Lord v. Kelley, that the IRS exerts undue >> influence on every judge who is also a taxpayer. Go figure! >> Count six: extortion (NOT a change in doctrine!) >> >> Delving even deeper into this putrid swamp of self-serving >> traitors, we find that the IRS is also bribing federal >> prosecutors to the tune of $25,000 for each indictment which they >> obtain from federal grand juries, against the President's >> political enemies. Would you have us believe that federal judges >> have remained completely above this criminal practice? Perhaps >> you do need to be reminded here, lest you conveniently forget, >> that Congress abolished the Performance Management and >> Recognition System in 1993, whereas the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 >> remains on the books (see Title 41, U.S.C., sections 51 et seq.). >> When was the last time you completed the financial disclosure >> which is required of you by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978? >> Count seven: bribery. >> >> And now, we get to the meat of this matter. Your efforts to >> prevent the truth from emerging in these various show trials are >> now becoming too painfully obvious, even to less educated >> Americans. General Partin, a demolition expert in the Pentagon, >> has already proven that the structural I-beams in the Murrah >> building were severed, most likely by plastic explosives which >> were drilled into the bearing columns and then exploded with >> pressure-sensitive detonators. That famous bullshit bomb of >> which you are so fond, did its job quite well -- the shock wave >> triggered the deaths of numerous innocent children, not to >> mention all the adults who lost their lives as well. What a >> coincidence that ATF personnel were conveniently gone on that >> terrible day, at that precise moment! >> >> Isn't it a shame, that you too were not in the Murrah building at >> that precise moment, so that you could now provide us with an >> exacting eyewitness account of how explosive bullshit has become >> in America. >> >> Bullshit, Matsch. You're no match for it, and it's all over your >> face, leaving permanent stains on your eyes, ears, nose and >> throat. The other stains -- the ones on your soul -- will remain >> there, forever indelible, forever yours. >> >> >> Irreverently submitted, >> >> /s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >> Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness, >> Counselor at Law, and Private Attorney General >> >> copy: the Internet >> >> >> # # # >> >> =========================================================================== >> Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 >> B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 >> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 >> email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 >> website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 >> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 >> _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 >> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 >> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 >> ======================================================================== 12 >> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13 >> >> >> > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail