Time: Thu Dec 04 16:38:35 1997
To: <jammin@u.washington.edu>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
Cc:
Bcc: sls
References: <3.0.3.16.19971204052951.2f072898@pop.primenet.com>
My apologies to you.
During this escalating crisis,
it is impossible for us to remain
neat and tidy, all the time.
I hope you can appreciate this.
Thanks in advance, for doing so.
/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com
At 02:50 PM 12/4/97 -0800, you wrote:
>How many times are we going to get this? Please send things only once.
>You clutter up people's mailboxes when you do this.
>
>
>"Wisdom is the perfect joining of creativity, logic, and truth."
>
> -- The Wise Conservative
>
>On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>
>> [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>>
>> c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
>> Tucson [zip code exempt]
>> ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>>
>> November 30, 1997
>> Mr. Richard Matsch
>> United States District Court
>> Federal Building
>> Denver, Colorado state
>>
>> Subject: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
>>
>> Dear Mr. Matsch:
>>
>> I am finally going to break my self-imposed silence on one of the
>> most heinous acts of terrorism this nation has ever experienced.
>> I believe that you, sir, are a traitor, and I am quite willing
>> and able to prove it. I do so, herein. Read on.
>>
>> In my several years of specializing in federal law, you can
>> imagine my shock one day, when I discovered how easy it had
>> become to rip any federal indictment into manifold shreds of
>> paper, without even reading to the second page.
>>
>> Beginning at the top, we usually find one or more U.S. ATTORNeys
>> listed as having power(s) of ATTORNey to represent the UNITED
>> STATES OF AMERICA (spelled in CAPITAL LETTERS, per force). Title
>> 28 of the United States Code does not authorize U.S. ATTORNeys to
>> represent the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, but only the United
>> States. Count one: misrepresentation.
>>
>> To "ATTORN" is to supervise the transfer of an estate from the
>> old lord to the new lord; it is a term from feudal law. Isn't
>> it interesting how closely the terms "feudal" and "federal" do
>> sound, when juxtaposed right next to each other? The long chain
>> of coincidences does not stop here. Keep reading!
>>
>> Further on down the first page of any federal indictment, we then
>> find that all criminal prosecutions are commenced in the United
>> States District Court ("USDC"). Unfortunately, the USDC has no
>> criminal jurisdiction whatsoever. This has now been proven by
>> the utter and demonstrable silence by the Department of Justice
>> to several Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests for the
>> statute(s), if any, which grant the USDC original jurisdiction
>> over criminal prosecutions. There is none. Count two:
>> deprivation of due process.
>>
>> Reaching the so-called real parties of interest now, these bogus
>> criminal actions [sic] invariably show the UNITED STATES OF
>> AMERICA as the moving Party, but the Congress of the United
>> States has never granted legal standing to the UNITED STATES OF
>> AMERICA to sue, or be sued, in the USDC. It is true that the
>> United States has been granted standing to sue, or be sued, in
>> the USDC, but the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the United States
>> [sic], are not one and the same. This you should have learned
>> way back in law school but, alas, they did not teach these things
>> in law schools way back when you were a student; they still
>> don't teach these things in law schools. Count three: fraud.
>>
>> The names of criminal defendants are likewise always spelled in
>> ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, which has now been nailed for invoking a
>> subtle, unconstitutional, yes, even criminal subterfuge whereby
>> martial rule is impressed upon the People of America, in blatant
>> violation of the prohibition against treason. Evidently, I need
>> to remind you that one of the penalties for treason is death.
>> But, you already know these things, correct? Count four:
>> treason (a capital offense).
>>
>> Very rarely, however, do litigants think to challenge the
>> legality of the body which issued these bogus indictments in the
>> first place. You probably do not know how many times this has
>> already been done -- properly, timely, lawfully, and correctly --
>> because an active conspiracy is afoot, within the Department of
>> Just US, to obstruct any and all pleadings which nail the federal
>> Jury Selection and Service Act for blatant, unconstitutional
>> discrimination against Citizens of the several states. Quite
>> simply, those who are qualified to make law in America are,
>> nevertheless, prevented from serving on grand and petit juries,
>> or from voting in general elections. Those who can serve on
>> grand and petit juries, or vote in general elections, are
>> prevented by Law from serving in any federal elected offices.
>> Doesn't this strike you as strange? Count five: conspiracy.
>>
>> All federal judges are also paying income taxes on their judicial
>> compensation, in blatant violation of the prohibition against
>> same which is found in Article III. This prohibition was upheld
>> in the magnificent opinion of the Supreme Court in Evans v. Gore
>> in 1920. Lately, however, our august Chief Justice has
>> confirmed, in front of a graduate class in the Law School of the
>> University of Arizona, that "there has been a change in
>> doctrine." But, in a rare moment of sanity, one of your own
>> colleagues proved, in Lord v. Kelley, that the IRS exerts undue
>> influence on every judge who is also a taxpayer. Go figure!
>> Count six: extortion (NOT a change in doctrine!)
>>
>> Delving even deeper into this putrid swamp of self-serving
>> traitors, we find that the IRS is also bribing federal
>> prosecutors to the tune of $25,000 for each indictment which they
>> obtain from federal grand juries, against the President's
>> political enemies. Would you have us believe that federal judges
>> have remained completely above this criminal practice? Perhaps
>> you do need to be reminded here, lest you conveniently forget,
>> that Congress abolished the Performance Management and
>> Recognition System in 1993, whereas the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986
>> remains on the books (see Title 41, U.S.C., sections 51 et seq.).
>> When was the last time you completed the financial disclosure
>> which is required of you by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978?
>> Count seven: bribery.
>>
>> And now, we get to the meat of this matter. Your efforts to
>> prevent the truth from emerging in these various show trials are
>> now becoming too painfully obvious, even to less educated
>> Americans. General Partin, a demolition expert in the Pentagon,
>> has already proven that the structural I-beams in the Murrah
>> building were severed, most likely by plastic explosives which
>> were drilled into the bearing columns and then exploded with
>> pressure-sensitive detonators. That famous bullshit bomb of
>> which you are so fond, did its job quite well -- the shock wave
>> triggered the deaths of numerous innocent children, not to
>> mention all the adults who lost their lives as well. What a
>> coincidence that ATF personnel were conveniently gone on that
>> terrible day, at that precise moment!
>>
>> Isn't it a shame, that you too were not in the Murrah building at
>> that precise moment, so that you could now provide us with an
>> exacting eyewitness account of how explosive bullshit has become
>> in America.
>>
>> Bullshit, Matsch. You're no match for it, and it's all over your
>> face, leaving permanent stains on your eyes, ears, nose and
>> throat. The other stains -- the ones on your soul -- will remain
>> there, forever indelible, forever yours.
>>
>>
>> Irreverently submitted,
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>> Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
>> Counselor at Law, and Private Attorney General
>>
>> copy: the Internet
>>
>>
>> # # #
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
>> B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
>> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
>> email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
>> website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
>> _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
>> ======================================================================== 12
>> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail