Time: Thu Dec 04 19:24:28 1997
To: joerivera <joerivera@MCI2000.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
Cc:
Bcc:
References:
There is a lot of material already
loaded in the Supreme Law Library,
and more coming, just as soon as
we find the necessary funding.
See the URL just below my name here:
The library is free; the school
costs money; my professional time
costs even more money.
Fair enough?
/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com
At 08:10 PM 12/4/97 -0500, you wrote:
>You sir, are the most interesting fellow I have never met!! Although I am
>confused about the entire OKC bombing scenario (suspicious too!), I am quite
>intrigued with your essay on federal indictments. My brother may receive
>one or two in the future for not filing tax returns. I have educated him as
>much as possible about the IRS and their abuses, as I had fallen victim to
>their fraud a couple of years ago. He has received the fraudulent "notice
>of levy" and has responded in writing, claiming just a few of the miriad of
>reasons why they can not collect. In any case, if there is anything that
>can stop the crooks in their tracks, I would be interested to know.
>
>After the new year, I will be enrolling in your online courses if they are
>still accepting freedom loving students.
>
>Your newest fan,
>
>JOE
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>To: Recipient list suppressed <Recipient list suppressed>
>Date: Monday, December 01, 1997 6:20 AM
>Subject: SLS: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
>
>
>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>>
>> c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
>> Tucson [zip code exempt]
>> ARIZONA REPUBLIC
>>
>> November 30, 1997
>>Mr. Richard Matsch
>>United States District Court
>>Federal Building
>>Denver, Colorado state
>>
>>Subject: Murdering Children to Save the Spies
>>
>>Dear Mr. Matsch:
>>
>>I am finally going to break my self-imposed silence on one of the
>>most heinous acts of terrorism this nation has ever experienced.
>>I believe that you, sir, are a traitor, and I am quite willing
>>and able to prove it. I do so, herein. Read on.
>>
>>In my several years of specializing in federal law, you can
>>imagine my shock one day, when I discovered how easy it had
>>become to rip any federal indictment into manifold shreds of
>>paper, without even reading to the second page.
>>
>>Beginning at the top, we usually find one or more U.S. ATTORNeys
>>listed as having power(s) of ATTORNey to represent the UNITED
>>STATES OF AMERICA (spelled in CAPITAL LETTERS, per force). Title
>>28 of the United States Code does not authorize U.S. ATTORNeys to
>>represent the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, but only the United
>>States. Count one: misrepresentation.
>>
>>To "ATTORN" is to supervise the transfer of an estate from the
>>old lord to the new lord; it is a term from feudal law. Isn't
>>it interesting how closely the terms "feudal" and "federal" do
>>sound, when juxtaposed right next to each other? The long chain
>>of coincidences does not stop here. Keep reading!
>>
>>Further on down the first page of any federal indictment, we then
>>find that all criminal prosecutions are commenced in the United
>>States District Court ("USDC"). Unfortunately, the USDC has no
>>criminal jurisdiction whatsoever. This has now been proven by
>>the utter and demonstrable silence by the Department of Justice
>>to several Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests for the
>>statute(s), if any, which grant the USDC original jurisdiction
>>over criminal prosecutions. There is none. Count two:
>>deprivation of due process.
>>
>>Reaching the so-called real parties of interest now, these bogus
>>criminal actions [sic] invariably show the UNITED STATES OF
>>AMERICA as the moving Party, but the Congress of the United
>>States has never granted legal standing to the UNITED STATES OF
>>AMERICA to sue, or be sued, in the USDC. It is true that the
>>United States has been granted standing to sue, or be sued, in
>>the USDC, but the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the United States
>>[sic], are not one and the same. This you should have learned
>>way back in law school but, alas, they did not teach these things
>>in law schools way back when you were a student; they still
>>don't teach these things in law schools. Count three: fraud.
>>
>>The names of criminal defendants are likewise always spelled in
>>ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, which has now been nailed for invoking a
>>subtle, unconstitutional, yes, even criminal subterfuge whereby
>>martial rule is impressed upon the People of America, in blatant
>>violation of the prohibition against treason. Evidently, I need
>>to remind you that one of the penalties for treason is death.
>>But, you already know these things, correct? Count four:
>>treason (a capital offense).
>>
>>Very rarely, however, do litigants think to challenge the
>>legality of the body which issued these bogus indictments in the
>>first place. You probably do not know how many times this has
>>already been done -- properly, timely, lawfully, and correctly --
>>because an active conspiracy is afoot, within the Department of
>>Just US, to obstruct any and all pleadings which nail the federal
>>Jury Selection and Service Act for blatant, unconstitutional
>>discrimination against Citizens of the several states. Quite
>>simply, those who are qualified to make law in America are,
>>nevertheless, prevented from serving on grand and petit juries,
>>or from voting in general elections. Those who can serve on
>>grand and petit juries, or vote in general elections, are
>>prevented by Law from serving in any federal elected offices.
>>Doesn't this strike you as strange? Count five: conspiracy.
>>
>>All federal judges are also paying income taxes on their judicial
>>compensation, in blatant violation of the prohibition against
>>same which is found in Article III. This prohibition was upheld
>>in the magnificent opinion of the Supreme Court in Evans v. Gore
>>in 1920. Lately, however, our august Chief Justice has
>>confirmed, in front of a graduate class in the Law School of the
>>University of Arizona, that "there has been a change in
>>doctrine." But, in a rare moment of sanity, one of your own
>>colleagues proved, in Lord v. Kelley, that the IRS exerts undue
>>influence on every judge who is also a taxpayer. Go figure!
>>Count six: extortion (NOT a change in doctrine!)
>>
>>Delving even deeper into this putrid swamp of self-serving
>>traitors, we find that the IRS is also bribing federal
>>prosecutors to the tune of $25,000 for each indictment which they
>>obtain from federal grand juries, against the President's
>>political enemies. Would you have us believe that federal judges
>>have remained completely above this criminal practice? Perhaps
>>you do need to be reminded here, lest you conveniently forget,
>>that Congress abolished the Performance Management and
>>Recognition System in 1993, whereas the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986
>>remains on the books (see Title 41, U.S.C., sections 51 et seq.).
>>When was the last time you completed the financial disclosure
>>which is required of you by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978?
>>Count seven: bribery.
>>
>>And now, we get to the meat of this matter. Your efforts to
>>prevent the truth from emerging in these various show trials are
>>now becoming too painfully obvious, even to less educated
>>Americans. General Partin, a demolition expert in the Pentagon,
>>has already proven that the structural I-beams in the Murrah
>>building were severed, most likely by plastic explosives which
>>were drilled into the bearing columns and then exploded with
>>pressure-sensitive detonators. That famous bullshit bomb of
>>which you are so fond, did its job quite well -- the shock wave
>>triggered the deaths of numerous innocent children, not to
>>mention all the adults who lost their lives as well. What a
>>coincidence that ATF personnel were conveniently gone on that
>>terrible day, at that precise moment!
>>
>>Isn't it a shame, that you too were not in the Murrah building at
>>that precise moment, so that you could now provide us with an
>>exacting eyewitness account of how explosive bullshit has become
>>in America.
>>
>>Bullshit, Matsch. You're no match for it, and it's all over your
>>face, leaving permanent stains on your eyes, ears, nose and
>>throat. The other stains -- the ones on your soul -- will remain
>>there, forever indelible, forever yours.
>>
>>
>>Irreverently submitted,
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
>>Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
>>Counselor at Law, and Private Attorney General
>>
>>copy: the Internet
>>
>>
>> # # #
>>
>>===========================================================================
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
>>B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
>>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
>>email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
>>website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
>>_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
>>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
>>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
>>======================================================================== 12
>>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
>>
>>
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail