Time: Thu Dec 04 19:24:28 1997 To: joerivera <joerivera@MCI2000.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Murdering Children to Save the Spies Cc: Bcc: References: There is a lot of material already loaded in the Supreme Law Library, and more coming, just as soon as we find the necessary funding. See the URL just below my name here: The library is free; the school costs money; my professional time costs even more money. Fair enough? /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 08:10 PM 12/4/97 -0500, you wrote: >You sir, are the most interesting fellow I have never met!! Although I am >confused about the entire OKC bombing scenario (suspicious too!), I am quite >intrigued with your essay on federal indictments. My brother may receive >one or two in the future for not filing tax returns. I have educated him as >much as possible about the IRS and their abuses, as I had fallen victim to >their fraud a couple of years ago. He has received the fraudulent "notice >of levy" and has responded in writing, claiming just a few of the miriad of >reasons why they can not collect. In any case, if there is anything that >can stop the crooks in their tracks, I would be interested to know. > >After the new year, I will be enrolling in your online courses if they are >still accepting freedom loving students. > >Your newest fan, > >JOE > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >To: Recipient list suppressed <Recipient list suppressed> >Date: Monday, December 01, 1997 6:20 AM >Subject: SLS: Murdering Children to Save the Spies > > >>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> >> >> c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 >> Tucson [zip code exempt] >> ARIZONA REPUBLIC >> >> November 30, 1997 >>Mr. Richard Matsch >>United States District Court >>Federal Building >>Denver, Colorado state >> >>Subject: Murdering Children to Save the Spies >> >>Dear Mr. Matsch: >> >>I am finally going to break my self-imposed silence on one of the >>most heinous acts of terrorism this nation has ever experienced. >>I believe that you, sir, are a traitor, and I am quite willing >>and able to prove it. I do so, herein. Read on. >> >>In my several years of specializing in federal law, you can >>imagine my shock one day, when I discovered how easy it had >>become to rip any federal indictment into manifold shreds of >>paper, without even reading to the second page. >> >>Beginning at the top, we usually find one or more U.S. ATTORNeys >>listed as having power(s) of ATTORNey to represent the UNITED >>STATES OF AMERICA (spelled in CAPITAL LETTERS, per force). Title >>28 of the United States Code does not authorize U.S. ATTORNeys to >>represent the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, but only the United >>States. Count one: misrepresentation. >> >>To "ATTORN" is to supervise the transfer of an estate from the >>old lord to the new lord; it is a term from feudal law. Isn't >>it interesting how closely the terms "feudal" and "federal" do >>sound, when juxtaposed right next to each other? The long chain >>of coincidences does not stop here. Keep reading! >> >>Further on down the first page of any federal indictment, we then >>find that all criminal prosecutions are commenced in the United >>States District Court ("USDC"). Unfortunately, the USDC has no >>criminal jurisdiction whatsoever. This has now been proven by >>the utter and demonstrable silence by the Department of Justice >>to several Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests for the >>statute(s), if any, which grant the USDC original jurisdiction >>over criminal prosecutions. There is none. Count two: >>deprivation of due process. >> >>Reaching the so-called real parties of interest now, these bogus >>criminal actions [sic] invariably show the UNITED STATES OF >>AMERICA as the moving Party, but the Congress of the United >>States has never granted legal standing to the UNITED STATES OF >>AMERICA to sue, or be sued, in the USDC. It is true that the >>United States has been granted standing to sue, or be sued, in >>the USDC, but the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the United States >>[sic], are not one and the same. This you should have learned >>way back in law school but, alas, they did not teach these things >>in law schools way back when you were a student; they still >>don't teach these things in law schools. Count three: fraud. >> >>The names of criminal defendants are likewise always spelled in >>ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, which has now been nailed for invoking a >>subtle, unconstitutional, yes, even criminal subterfuge whereby >>martial rule is impressed upon the People of America, in blatant >>violation of the prohibition against treason. Evidently, I need >>to remind you that one of the penalties for treason is death. >>But, you already know these things, correct? Count four: >>treason (a capital offense). >> >>Very rarely, however, do litigants think to challenge the >>legality of the body which issued these bogus indictments in the >>first place. You probably do not know how many times this has >>already been done -- properly, timely, lawfully, and correctly -- >>because an active conspiracy is afoot, within the Department of >>Just US, to obstruct any and all pleadings which nail the federal >>Jury Selection and Service Act for blatant, unconstitutional >>discrimination against Citizens of the several states. Quite >>simply, those who are qualified to make law in America are, >>nevertheless, prevented from serving on grand and petit juries, >>or from voting in general elections. Those who can serve on >>grand and petit juries, or vote in general elections, are >>prevented by Law from serving in any federal elected offices. >>Doesn't this strike you as strange? Count five: conspiracy. >> >>All federal judges are also paying income taxes on their judicial >>compensation, in blatant violation of the prohibition against >>same which is found in Article III. This prohibition was upheld >>in the magnificent opinion of the Supreme Court in Evans v. Gore >>in 1920. Lately, however, our august Chief Justice has >>confirmed, in front of a graduate class in the Law School of the >>University of Arizona, that "there has been a change in >>doctrine." But, in a rare moment of sanity, one of your own >>colleagues proved, in Lord v. Kelley, that the IRS exerts undue >>influence on every judge who is also a taxpayer. Go figure! >>Count six: extortion (NOT a change in doctrine!) >> >>Delving even deeper into this putrid swamp of self-serving >>traitors, we find that the IRS is also bribing federal >>prosecutors to the tune of $25,000 for each indictment which they >>obtain from federal grand juries, against the President's >>political enemies. Would you have us believe that federal judges >>have remained completely above this criminal practice? Perhaps >>you do need to be reminded here, lest you conveniently forget, >>that Congress abolished the Performance Management and >>Recognition System in 1993, whereas the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 >>remains on the books (see Title 41, U.S.C., sections 51 et seq.). >>When was the last time you completed the financial disclosure >>which is required of you by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978? >>Count seven: bribery. >> >>And now, we get to the meat of this matter. Your efforts to >>prevent the truth from emerging in these various show trials are >>now becoming too painfully obvious, even to less educated >>Americans. General Partin, a demolition expert in the Pentagon, >>has already proven that the structural I-beams in the Murrah >>building were severed, most likely by plastic explosives which >>were drilled into the bearing columns and then exploded with >>pressure-sensitive detonators. That famous bullshit bomb of >>which you are so fond, did its job quite well -- the shock wave >>triggered the deaths of numerous innocent children, not to >>mention all the adults who lost their lives as well. What a >>coincidence that ATF personnel were conveniently gone on that >>terrible day, at that precise moment! >> >>Isn't it a shame, that you too were not in the Murrah building at >>that precise moment, so that you could now provide us with an >>exacting eyewitness account of how explosive bullshit has become >>in America. >> >>Bullshit, Matsch. You're no match for it, and it's all over your >>face, leaving permanent stains on your eyes, ears, nose and >>throat. The other stains -- the ones on your soul -- will remain >>there, forever indelible, forever yours. >> >> >>Irreverently submitted, >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >>Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. >>Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness, >>Counselor at Law, and Private Attorney General >> >>copy: the Internet >> >> >> # # # >> >>=========================================================================== >>Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 >>B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 >>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 >>email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 >>website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 >>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 >>_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 >>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 >>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 >>======================================================================== 12 >>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13 >> >> > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail