Time: Fri Dec 05 14:29:05 1997
To: patwriot@juno.com (Winston Smith)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Latest devil-opment with state.
Bcc: sls

Move for discovery of your state's
Agreement on Coordination of Tax
Administration ("ACTA") with the Commissioner
of Internal Revenue.  These contracts
have now been proven to be fraudulent,
if only because they define "IRS"
as an agency of the U.S. Department
of the Treasury.  BUT, IRS is NOT IN
the U.S. Department of the Treasury,
which can be established, via rules
of evidence and judicial notice, by
citing Title 31, U.S.C., in toto.

IRS is Trust #62 domiciled in Puerto
Rico, under color of the Federal Alcohol
Administration, which was held to be
unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1935!!  You should also get the CIR's
corresponding version of the same ACTA,
via a proper FOIA request for same.  Then,
you will have a basis for comparing the
two contracts which are disclosed,
under compelled discovery rules.

Then, start having some fun!!

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress

At 11:13 AM 12/5/97 EST, you wrote:
>In Court the state's witness testified that I had not filed a federal
>income tax return for 20 years.   I had not filed a state return either 
>because the only ones required to file a state return are those
>required to file federal returns AND had a Missouri adjusted gross
>income of 1200 dollars.
>The Missouri adjusted gross income is found on federal returns.
>With there being no federal returns, there was no Missouri adjusted
>gross income!
>Now I have unsigned mail from the Missouri Dept. of Revenue.
>They inform me that they have my returns for the two years in 
>question but they are unsigned.       They do not ask me to sign them
>because I would see paper that I have never seen before.   They ask 
>for my signature on a form and tell me that my signature on that form 
>will constitute a signature on my return that I had never seen nor never
>knew existed.  They said that without signatures, the returns are not
>valid and can not be processed.    Well!!   The forms are invalid!
>Why would I want them valid and processed??????????
>Asking me to provide signatures for returns that I have never seen is
>no different than asking me to sign a blank check or a blank contract!
>In preparing federal and state returns for 2 years and claiming the 
>returns are mine, they have committed four acts of forgery as defined 
>in Black's Law Dictionary, 4th edition.
>In claiming the papers that I have never seen are mine, is perjury and
>In asking me to sign for returns that I do not believe are true, 
>constitutes subornation of perjury.
>If I signed the form that they want signed, I'd be guilty of perjury and
>Suppose they had the right to prepare returns in my name, did they do it
>and make me a criminal AFTER the time that my "crime" of not filing was
>committed?   I hope to see.
>Federal income tax is imposed upon federal citizen who is subject to
>its jurisdiction.---Cook v Tait 265 U S 47
>--------- End forwarded message ----------

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail