Time: Wed Dec 10 19:20:51 1997
To: 
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLF: IRS is an extortion racket
Cc: 
Bcc: <issues@concentric.net>
References: 

[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
and Vice President for Legal Affairs
c/o General Delivery at:
2509 North Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
without prejudice




                 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

                       DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


In Re:                          )  Case No. #93-06051-PHX-GBN
                                )
New Life Health Center Company, )  7th SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION
Debtor                          )  FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, FOR
                                )  RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY
                                )  AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY
                                )  JUDICIAL NOTICE:
________________________________)
                                )  Rule 201(d), Federal Rules
Paul Andrew Mitchell,           )  of Evidence;  Rule 4001,
                                )  Local Bankruptcy Rule;
          Movant,               )  Full Faith and Credit Clause
                                )
     v.                         )
                                )
New Life Health Center Company  )
et al.,                         )
                                )
          Respondents.          )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui  Juris, Citizen  of Arizona

state, expressly  not a  citizen of  the United  States ("federal

citizen"),  Federal   Witness,  Private   Attorney  General,  and

Candidate for  the U.S.  House  of  Representatives  (hereinafter

"Movant"), to  provide formal  Notice to all interested party(s),

and to  demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court,

pursuant to  Rule 201(d)  of the  Federal Rules  of Evidence,  of

Movant's arguments,  as made  herein, why  this Court should deny

confirmation of Debtor's First Amended Plan of Reorganization.


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 1 of 17


              FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND UPON MOVANT

     Fraud has  been perpetrated  upon this  honorable Court,  by

virtue of  misrepresentations by  Mr. Robert  A. Johnson, Esquire

("Mr. Johnson"), to wit:

     Mr. Johnson  does not  have a  valid oath  of office.    See

attached Exhibits  "A", "B",  and "C",  which are attached hereto

and incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.

     Mr. Johnson  does not  enjoy any lawful power(s) of attorney

to represent the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic].

     Mr. Johnson has fallen totally silent in the face of two (2)

affidavits  which  implicate  Mr.  Johnson  in  barratry,  fraud,

extortion, and criminal conspiracy against Debtor.

     Said affidavits  have now  become the truth of the case, for

all time.  See exhibits attached.

     Moreover,  the   "Internal  Revenue   Service"  is   not  an

organization within the United States Department of the Treasury.

It has never been authorized by Act of Congress to exist as such.

     The "Internal  Revenue Service"  is  actually  an  extortion

racket operating  as Trust #62, which is domiciled in Puerto Rico

-- a  federal "State"  -- under  color  of  the  Federal  Alcohol

Administration ("FAA"), but the FAA was declared unconstitutional

by the Supreme Court of the United States in the year 1935.


                   DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS

     This court has inflicted a financial hardship upon Movant by

abusing discretion  and depriving  Movant of Movant's fundamental

Right to  due process  of law,  by failing  timely to  rule  upon

Movant's APPLICATION  FOR INTERVENTION  OF RIGHT, RELIEF FROM THE

AUTOMATIC STAY, AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS.


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 2 of 17


     Movant has  thus been  arbitrarily and capriciously deprived

of an  opportunity to  intervene in  the instant  case so  as  to

defend the  Debtor against  certain,  specific  criminal  conduct

being perpetrated  upon Debtor by officers, co-workers and agents

of the Debtor.  Movant has gone to great lengths to document said

criminal conduct  -- by  means of  pleadings including,  but  not

limited to,  Movant's  VERIFIED  CRIMINAL  COMPLAINTS  previously

filed and properly served upon all interested party(s).

     The several  officers and  alleged agents  of this Court are

thus implicated  in fraud upon Movant, and also in depriving, and

in conspiring to deprive, Movant of fundamental Rights guaranteed

to Movant  by the  Constitution for the United States of America,

as lawfully amended, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242.

     See Exhibit "D", also incorporated herein by reference.


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States" (federal government), that the above

statement of  fact is  true and correct, according to the best of

My current  information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Dated:  December 10, 1997

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without prejudice


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 3 of 17


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul  Andrew,  Mitchell,  Sui  Juris,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without the "United States" (federal government), that I

am at  least 18  years of  age, a  Citizen of  one of  the United

States of  America, and  that I  personally served  the following

document(s):

    7th SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT,
             FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY AND
              DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
             Rule 201(d), Federal Rules of Evidence;
                Rule 4001, Local Bankruptcy Rule;
                  Full Faith and Credit Clause

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class U.S. Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to:

Christopher H. Bayley           United States Trustees
Todd V. Jones                   c/o P.O. Box 36170
c/o 400 E. Van Buren            Phoenix 85067-6170/tdc
One Arizona Center              ARIZONA STATE
Phoenix 85004-0001/tdc
ARIZONA STATE

Cathy Holt                      Robert A. Johnson, Esquire
Lewis and Roca                  "Internal Revenue Service" [sic]
c/o 40 N. Central Ave.          c/o 3225 N. Central, #1500
Phoenix 85004/tdc               Phoenix 85012-2469/tdc
ARIZONA STATE                   ARIZONA STATE

Brian Feldman, Esquire
Department of Justice
Civil Trial Section -- Western Region
c/o P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station
Washington 20044-0683/tdc
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]


Executed on December 10, 1997:

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 4 of 17


                          Exhibit "A":

                 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND

                 TO:    Mr. Robert A. Johnson
                 FROM:  Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell
                 DATE:  May 27, 1996


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 5 of 17


Certified U.S. Mail                   c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-899-777-085                Tucson, Arizona state
Return Receipt Requested                          zip code exempt
Restricted Delivery Requested                        May 27, 1996

                 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND

Mr. Robert A. Johnson
3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500
Phoenix, Arizona state
zip code exempt

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This is  to inform  you that you have been implicated in barratry
and criminal  conspiracy because  of verified  statements of fact
which have  been made in EXHIBIT "D" attached to the AFFIDAVIT OF
CAUSES AND  OBJECTIONS TO  O.S.C. which  I executed  and filed on
behalf on  the Company  In re:  Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New
Life Health Center Company, U.S. District Court Case No. GJ-95-1-
6, Tucson, Arizona.

You will  have at most thirty (30) calendar days, as of the above
date, to  file any  verified affidavit(s)  of  rebuttal  to  this
EXHIBIT "D",  a  copy  of  which  is  attached  hereto  for  your
convenience.   Under applicable  rules of  the Common  Law, which
have been  formally invoked  in this  case, your failure to rebut
said EXHIBIT  will render it conclusive fact and the truth of the
case for all time.  Silence creates estoppel by acquiescence.

     Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a
     legal or  moral duty  to speak or where an inquiry left
     unanswered would  be intentionally  misleading. ...  We
     cannot condone  this shocking  conduct by the IRS.  Our
     revenue system  is based  upon the  good faith  of  the
     taxpayers and  the taxpayers  should be  able to expect
     the  same   from  government  in  its  enforcement  and
     collection activities....   This sort of deception will
     not be tolerated and if this is the "routine" it should
     be corrected immediately.

                  [U. S. vs Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977)]
       [quoting U.S. vs Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 (1970)]
                                            [emphasis added]

     Silence is  a species  of conduct,  and constitutes  an
     implied representation of the existence of the state of
     facts in  question, and  the estoppel  is accordingly a
     species  of   estoppel  by  misrepresentation.    [cite
     omitted]  When silence is of such a character and under
     such circumstances  that it  would become  a fraud upon
     the other party to permit the party who has kept silent
     to deny  what his  silence has  induced  the  other  to
     believe and act upon, it will operate as an estoppel.

        [Carmine vs Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906), emphasis added]


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 6 of 17


Please be  advised that  the Company  and its  officers  and  co-
workers have  explicitly reserved  their right  to have a jury of
peers resolve controversies of fact and law in this case.

Thank you  very much  in advance for your cooperation.  The clock
is now running.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state
(520) 323-3921 phone/VM
(520) 323-3922 fax/24-hour
email: pmitch@primenet.com

copies:  Judge John M. Roll, U.S. District Court, Tucson
         Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit, Pasadena
         Judge George Nielsen, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix
         Albert M. Rau, Chapter 13 Trustee, Phoenix
         James J. Everett, Counsel for Debtors, Phoenix


                             #  #  #


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 7 of 17


                          Exhibit "B":

                 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND

                 TO:    Mr. Robert A. Johnson
                 FROM:  Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell
                 DATE:  June 15, 1996


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 8 of 17


Certified U.S. Mail                   c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-476-653-250                Tucson, Arizona state
Return Receipt Requested                          zip code exempt
Restricted Delivery Requested                       June 15, 1996

                 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND

Mr. Robert A. Johnson
3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500
Phoenix, Arizona state
zip code exempt

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This is  to inform you that you have been implicated in barratry,
fraud, extortion,  and criminal  conspiracy because  of  verified
statements of fact which have been made in the JOINT AFFIDAVIT OF
DR. AND  MRS. EUGENE  BURNS AND  DR. AND MRS. SHELDON DEAL, which
was executed and filed on behalf on the Company In re: Grand Jury
Subpoena Served  on New Life Health Center Company, U.S. District
Court Case No. GJ-95-1-6, Tucson, Arizona.

You will  have at most thirty (30) calendar days, as of the above
date, to  file any  verified affidavit(s)  of  rebuttal  to  this
AFFIDAVIT,  a   copy  of   which  is  attached  hereto  for  your
convenience.   Under applicable  rules of  the Common  Law, which
have been  formally invoked  in this  case, your failure to rebut
said AFFIDAVIT  will render  it conclusive  fact and the truth of
the case for all time.  Silence creates estoppel by acquiescence.

     Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a
     legal or  moral duty  to speak or where an inquiry left
     unanswered would  be intentionally  misleading. ...  We
     cannot condone  this shocking  conduct by the IRS.  Our
     revenue system  is based  upon the  good faith  of  the
     taxpayers and  the taxpayers  should be  able to expect
     the  same   from  government  in  its  enforcement  and
     collection activities....   This sort of deception will
     not be tolerated and if this is the "routine" it should
     be corrected immediately.

                  [U. S. vs Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977)]
       [quoting U.S. vs Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 (1970)]
                                            [emphasis added]

     Silence is  a species  of conduct,  and constitutes  an
     implied representation of the existence of the state of
     facts in  question, and  the estoppel  is accordingly a
     species  of   estoppel  by  misrepresentation.    [cite
     omitted]  When silence is of such a character and under
     such circumstances  that it  would become  a fraud upon
     the other party to permit the party who has kept silent
     to deny  what his  silence has  induced  the  other  to
     believe and act upon, it will operate as an estoppel.

        [Carmine vs Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906), emphasis added]


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 9 of 17


Please be  advised that  the Company  and its  officers  and  co-
workers have  explicitly reserved  their right  to have a jury of
peers resolve controversies of fact and law in this case.

Thank you  very much  in advance for your cooperation.  The clock
is now running.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state
(520) 323-3921 phone/VM
(520) 323-3922 fax/24-hour
email: pmitch@primenet.com

copies:  Judge John M. Roll, U.S. District Court, Tucson
         Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit, Pasadena
         Judge George Nielsen, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix
         Albert M. Rau, Chapter 13 Trustee, Phoenix
         James J. Everett, former Counsel for Debtors, Phoenix


                             #  #  #


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 10 of 17


                          Exhibit "C":

                      AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT

                      TO:    Mr. Robert A. Johnson
                      FROM:  Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell
                      DATE:  August 5, 1996


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 11 of 17


Certified U.S. Mail                   c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-332-390-902                Tucson, Arizona state
Return Receipt Requested                          zip code exempt
Restricted Delivery Requested                      August 5, 1996

                      AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT

Mr. Robert A. Johnson
3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500
Phoenix, Arizona state
zip code exempt

Dear Mr. Johnson:

     This is  my AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT affirming, under penalty of
perjury, that  by your  total silence  you have  defaulted in the
face of my two (2) CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICES AND DEMANDS dated May 27,
1996, and  June 15,  1996,  respectively,  copies  of  which  are
attached for your information and recollection.

     In said  NOTICES AND  DEMANDS, you  were advised  that  your
silence in  the face of the attached AFFIDAVITS would render them
conclusive fact  and the truth of the case for all time, and that
your silence would invoke estoppel by acquiescence.

     To repeat, you have completely failed to answer or otherwise
rebut, either verbally or in writing, any of the statements which
have been made in the above mentioned AFFIDAVITS.


                          VERIFICATION

     I hereby  certify, under  penalty of perjury, under the laws
of the  United States  of America,  without the  "United States,"
that the above statement of fact is true and correct, to the best
of my  current knowledge,  information, and  belief, that  it  is
materially complete  and not misleading, so help Me God, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Executed on August 5, 1996.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness

attachments

copy:  Federal Bureau of Investigation


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 12 of 17


                          Exhibit "D":

                         PRESS RELEASE:

                "Paul Mitchell Wins Civil Verdict
            against Accountant for Embezzling $3,000"

                        November 12, 1997


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 13 of 17


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                           November 12, 1997

                Paul Mitchell Wins Civil Verdict
            against Accountant for Embezzling $3,000

Tucson, Arizona.  Paul Andrew Mitchell, Counselor at Law, federal
witness, and  founder of  the Supreme  Law Firm  and Supreme  Law
School, was awarded more than $3,000 in actual damages today from
a jury  of 8  who agreed  that  Neil  and  Evelyn  Nordbrock  had
embezzled funds entrusted to their care and management.
     Mitchell was  invited by  the Nordbrocks to change plans and
move to  Tucson in  late February  of 1996,  when they  met at  a
conference on common law in Albuquerque, New Mexico.  A scheduled
speaker failed  to show, and Mitchell was asked to address a full
audience instead.   The  Nordbrocks were  so moved  by Mitchell's
lecture, they  offered him  an  office  in  Tucson,  Arizona,  to
continue his  research there.   That  office was  a single  room,
without windows,  in the  administrative headquarters  of the New
Life Health Center.
     Soon after  arriving in  Tucson,  Mitchell  was  invited  to
lecture  at   the  Elizabeth   Broderick  Seminars  in  Palmdale,
California,  where  Broderick  claimed  to  have  perfected  huge
commercial liens  against government  agencies like the County of
Orange, California.  Broderick even took credit for precipitating
the largest  municipal bankruptcy in the history of America, when
the County  of Orange  floundered under Treasurer Robert Citron's
failed financial  management  of  overly  leveraged  derivatives.
Broderick then issued phony bank checks against these bogus liens
to all  attendees of  her biweekly  seminars.  An estimated 5,000
people received her warrants at these seminars.
     Broderick's checks were collected at FBI headquarters in Los
Angeles, California.   From  there, the  checks were  handed to a
property forfeiture  team, with headquarters in the Department of
Justice.   Mitchell has  recently filed  a formal  OFFER TO PROVE
RACKETEERING in  the Superior  Court of  the  State  of  Arizona,
alleging that  DOJ aided and abetted Broderick's racket, by using
the phony  checks to  entrap Broderick's naive seminar attendees.
Broderick has since been convicted of 26 counts of bank fraud and
mail fraud.  All her co-defendants were likewise convicted.
     While Mitchell  was beginning  to build  an early foundation
for Broderick's  defense, his  efforts were quickly scuttled when
the Colton  office rented  by Adolf  Hoch, a Broderick associate,
was gutted  of all  computer and  related equipment, leaving only
the carpets  and empty  desks.   At the  same time,  Mitchell was
loaned a  car with tampered front brakes.  A Colton auto mechanic
invited him  to inspect the car, while it was on the rack and the
brake assembly was at eye level.  Adolf Hoch was asked to pay for
the repairs, but he complained that the mechanic was gouging him.
At that time, Hoch was driving a new Buick Riviera worth $35,000,
and the estimated brake repairs cost less than $500.
     A related  case was  also heating  up while  Mitchell was in
Colton, attempting  to assemble  a  major  defense  strategy  for
Broderick and  her co-defendants.   The New Life Health Center in
Tucson, Arizona,  was served  with a  grand jury subpoena for all
business records.   The  general manager  of New  Life, Eugene A.


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 14 of 17


Burns, had  used several  Broderick warrants,  "flushing New Life
with much  needed cash,"  as Adolf Hoch had confided to Mitchell,
on one of several trips from Broderick's San Bernardino office to
the Essex  Hotel in  Palmdale, California.  En route to Palmdale,
Hoch was  speeding at 90 mph, and nearly missed a small car as it
crossed the  highway, failing  to anticipate  the high  speed  of
Hoch's new  Buick in  the dark  desert.   Hoch made  a  habit  of
holding the  wheel with  one hand  and a cell phone in the other,
while weaving recklessly through rush hour traffic.
     Mitchell returned  to Tucson  and turned his attention to an
aggressive attack on the grand jury subpoena, and on the Internal
Revenue Service  which had  initiated DOJ's attempt to obtain New
Life's records.   With  strong encouragement from Neil Nordbrock,
Mitchell  conceived   a  powerful   defense  which  was  recently
published in  the Supreme  Law Library, an Internet-based archive
of all  key cases  Mitchell has  litigated as a Counselor at Law.
That library is available at Internet URL http://supremelaw.com.
     To facilitate  court appearances,  Mitchell was appointed to
the office of New Life's Vice President for Legal Affairs, at the
recommendation of New Life's accountant, Neil Nordbrock, and that
appointment was  recognized, and  placed into evidence, by United
States District  Judge  John  M.  Roll  in  Tucson.    With  this
authority,  Mitchell   wrote  a  flurry  of  25  pleadings  which
overwhelmed the  federal judge  and sent  the IRS and DOJ running
for cover.
     One of  those pleadings  exposed, for  the first  time, what
Mitchell now  calls "The  Kick-Back Racket,"  a  defunct  federal
program called  Performance Management  and  Recognition  System,
which awards illegal cash payments to prosecutors and judges, for
getting indictments  from grand  juries against  tax  protestors.
Mitchell all  but proved that a perjury racket was, and still is,
rampant within  the DOJ.   On a motion by the corrupt prosecutor,
Robert  L.   Miskell,  the  federal  judge  then  struck  all  of
Mitchell's 25  pleadings, after obstructing their delivery by the
U.S. Postal  Service to  the federal  grand jury convened in that
case.   Mitchell even  used Registered  U.S. Mail, but the return
receipts were  signed by  Judge Roll's  secretary, instead of the
grand jury foreperson.
     During the  course of  studying New Life's records, Mitchell
also discovered  that his  appointment  to  the  office  of  Vice
President had  been faked  by a  rubber stamp trustee.  In a very
confidential memo to Neil Nordbrock, long-time accountant for New
Life, Mitchell  predicted that  a fictitious  trustee would cause
enormous legal  problems for  New Life,  if it  was not corrected
immediately.   Nordbrock never  answered Mitchell's  memo on this
subject, and  observed passively  as Eugene  A. Burns,  a  former
racketball champion,  fell into  a full  blown panic when the FBI
put pressure  on  Burns  to  jettison  Mitchell  from  the  case.
Mitchell was  abruptly terminated  from New  Life one month after
Nordbrock received  this confidential  memo.   Mitchell concluded
from this  that Nordbrock  had conceived  and/or  maintained  the
fictitious trustee, from the beginning.
     The Pima  County  Justice  Court,  in  which  Mitchell  sued
Nordbrock, refused  to allow  this confidential  memorandum  into
evidence, in addition to four full boxes of other documents.  The
judge in  that case,  Walter U.  Weber, also  decided to disallow
Mitchell's claim  that the Nordbrocks had breached a contract for


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 15 of 17


legal services  Mitchell performed  for them  after his  wrongful
termination from  New  Life.    Weber  ruled  that  Mitchell  had
practiced law  by providing  legal services  to  the  Nordbrocks.
Mitchell plans  to appeal  that portion  of  the  case,  to  make
precedent based  in part  on the original 13th Amendment, and the
Contract  Clause   in  the  U.S.  Constitution.    Mitchell  also
maneuvered Weber into a bona fide controversy over the provisions
invoked by Weber's oath of office to support that Constitution.
     Neil Nordbrock  had retained  Mitchell to  commence a  quiet
title action  against the IRS, but Mitchell referred that case to
Vern Holland in Tulsa, Oklahoma, a recognized quiet title expert,
after Mitchell  was invited  to defend  the  Montana  Freeman  on
location in  Billings,  Montana.    Mitchell  highly  recommended
Holland to  the Nordbrocks, who did retain Holland to prepare the
initial complaint  to quiet title to a business office once owned
by the  Nordbrocks, but  now forfeited  to  the  IRS  for  unpaid
federal income  taxes.   Neil  Nordbrock  had  tendered  a  bogus
Montana Freeman  warrant to  the IRS  for the  sum  of  $398,000,
during the month before the Albuquerque conference.
     Upon returning  from  Montana,  Mitchell  learned  that  the
Nordbrocks were  about to switch attorneys once again, and retain
a local  Tucson bar  member, after complaining bitterly and often
to Mitchell  about the  bar monopoly  practices.   The Nordbrocks
then paid  the new  attorney's retainer with money they embezzled
from Mitchell.   That $3,000 was all the money which Mitchell had
in the  world, at  that point  in time,  and the embezzlement put
enormous pressure  on  Mitchell  just  to  survive.    A  private
mediator even  had to  loan Mitchell  money, just  to  buy  food.
Other generous  Americans have  quietly helped Mitchell climb out
of the deep hole caused by DOJ's outright economic retaliation.
     Neil Nordbrock  has already  been convicted  on  two  felony
counts of  falsifying federal  income tax returns, and a lifetime
injunction prevents  him from  preparing  tax  returns.    Evelyn
Nordbrock, his  wife, makes a living doing tax returns for Neil's
former clients,  despite their  low opinion of the IRS.  Clearly,
they have  mixed feelings  about Mitchell's  admitted plans,  and
highly successful efforts thus far, to dismantle the IRS.  Evelyn
Nordbrock will need to find other work, if Mitchell succeeds.
     Mitchell also  plans to  sue Eugene  A. Burns  for  wrongful
termination, and a host of other claims arising from his practice
of refusing Mitchell's frequent legal mail, and defaming Mitchell
with obnoxious  insults on  the  outside  of  refused  envelopes.
Under pressure  from Mitchell  to subpoena  Eugene A.  Burns  for
additional testimony,  however, Walter  U. Weber  explained  that
Burns was no longer available.  Why, he did not say.
     Weber had  also threatened  Mitchell with  prison  and  hard
labor, during  the  first  day  of  trial,  because  of  all  the
sensitive  issues  raised  by  Mitchell's  voluminous  pleadings.
Mitchell types  140 words  per minute, and shares huge quantities
of email  on the  Internet.  A motion to change judge was denied.
Mitchell has  filed a  criminal complaint  against Weber  anyway,
because Mitchell  is a recognized federal witness under 18 U.S.C.
1513, the  federal law  which prohibits  retaliating against  any
federal witness.   The  penalties  for  violating  this  criminal
statute are quite severe.
     Mitchell is now awaiting a ruling from a federal  bankruptcy
court  in  Phoenix,  Arizona,  to  lift  the  automatic  stay  on


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 16 of 17


litigation  against  Burns  and  his  company,  and  to  issue  a
declaratory judgment on the validity of Mitchell's appointment to
the office  of Vice  President for  Legal  Affairs.    Mitchell's
research has  already uncovered  numerous irregularities  in  the
original bankruptcy  petitions by  Burns and  New Life, including
false appraisals of 4 rare South American macaw birds which Burns
regards as  his  special  pets.    Magoo  and  the  other  macaws
accompany Burns  to and from work every day, and daily screech at
high decibels,  while people  are trying to work, and talk on the
telephone, in the same office space.
     Burns paid  Mitchell $100 per week initially, upping that to
$500 per week during the height of the grand jury litigation, but
stiffed Mitchell  for over  $2,000 in  back  pay,  when  Mitchell
discovered that  "Sheryl Smith"  is a  fictitious trustee.  Burns
routinely paid New Life's former attorney, James J. Everett, at a
rate of $175 per hour, before Everett upped that rate to $200 per
hour.   Burns is now reported to have sued Everett for fraudulent
invoices;  this report remains unconfirmed.


      Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 17 of 17


                             #  #  #

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail