Time: Fri Dec 12 16:28:35 1997
To: APLsauce <APLsauce@aol.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Oath of Office
Cc: 
Bcc: sls
References: 

See 4 U.S.C. 101;  this will guarantee
a "federal question" whenever you challenge
the oath of office for any state employee.

Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF elaborates the
implications:  failure to take the oath is
ground for ouster via Quo Warranto. 

Confer at "Quo warranto" in Black's and
other legal dictionaries.  Federal questions
are adjudicated in the "district courts"
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331:  be sure to
invoke the District Court of the United States
("DCUS"), pursuant to the "Arising Under"
Clause;  the language is repeated at 1331,
to wit:

  "... Constitution, laws, or treaties
   of the United States."

4 U.S.C. 101 is a law of the United States!

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com


At 05:40 PM 12/12/97 EST, you wrote:
>I know that legislation has been passed by most legislative branches of
>government which make it difficult to recall any elected employee. But how
>about this. The oath of office they took at the swearing in ceremony was a
>contract. In industry, any person failing to fulfill the contract is summarily
>dismissed. Is there any possibility this could be applied to elected
>employees?
>Shep
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail