Time: Fri Dec 12 17:04:17 1997 To: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Commerce--Interstate v. Intrastate? Cc: Bcc: sls References: <3.0.1.32.19971206004902.00a82af8@alicenet.com> <01bd01e5$1f682760$5238edcc@vucqpqlj> If/when you get a driver's license and/or auto registration, you place your property in the custody of the state as a "motor vehicle" and you then must license your use of this "motor vehicle" and, of course, you must also indemnify the state's interest in that motor vehicle. This places you into "interstate commerce," whether you agree with this scam or not. The only current solution is to surrender your driver's license AND your plates, and sue out the ownership of your car in a Quiet Title action. That's the only way I know of getting out from under this cloak and dagger interstate commerce [sic]. But, the proper construction of the Commerce Clause does NOT mention the inhabitants of the several states, only the several states! There is a BIG difference between the two. /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 12:37 AM 12/6/97 -0600, you wrote: >At 05:49 AM 12/6/97 +0000, Jim Bullock wrote: >>>>> >Brooks, > >You may want to re-read the commerce clause: > >"To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and >among the several states, and with the Indian >tribes;" > >unless you are a foreign nation, a state, >or an indian tribe, the feds have no >constitutional authority to regulate the >buying and selling of anything between >people. > >So how do they get away with it? > >Jim Bullock > > >Another good question is how in the hell do the states think they can tax and regulate commerce performed by Indian tribes? > >old jim >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with "unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject) Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail