Time: Sun Dec 14 12:14:14 1997 To: From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: The White South and Freedom (was: ROUND FIVE) Cc: Bcc: sls References: <snip> > >Elizabeth, you are a rare gem. Would you share with me >the major forces in your life which led you to the >conclusions you reach below? What do you think of the >black pride movement? Do you think there are many >blacks who understand the dangers as you do? How about >an organization of these folks? > >Thanks for your many fine posts. > >Doug > >Dr. Douglas W. Schell >Professor of Business and Economics >The University of North Carolina- Pembroke >1709 Crest Dr. >Aberdeen, NC 28315 >(910) 944-5757 (home) >(910) 521-6463 (office) > >On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Elizabeth Wright >> Now, why do I care about this? Because I am >not fooled by the "diversity" folk into believing that >the institutions of this society will be preserved and >honored by those who happen to share my gene >>pool. I have never taken these institutions for >granted and even as a teenager realized that I enjoyed >liberties unheard of during most epochs of history and >undreamed of on most parts of this planet. The >>multicultural ideologues (who come in all colors but >are rife with black loyalists) make it clear that they >view these institutions with contempt. They are >working for nothing less than total control and are >>managing to co-opt the very people who should be >fighting them. >> If and when these people come to power, their >major aim will be to institute their "enlightenment" >policies in all quarters of society. If >>you think the P.C. stuff now being rammed down our >throats via the media and academia is stifling, you >ain't seen all that they have in store. I >>have heard them refer to liberties such as freedom of >speech as no more than "niceties" and "jiveass >claptrap." To be done away with, you can >>be sure, if and when the natives get too restless. >> I see no deepseated, heartfelt opposition to >this trend except among white "Southrons." Other types >of conservatives talk tough until an epithet is hurled >their way. Then they fold. Or start regurgitating >>that mealymouthed "We's all God's chillun'" stuff that >was taught to them by the multiculturalists. White >southerners are used to being battered with every kind >of insult. They've been under siege for over a >>century. If they don't have toughened hides by now, >then it's simply not possible to toughen a hide. >> So, I look at it this way. Who is most likely >to fight the hardest to maintain and conserve this >extraordinary experiment in freedom that was >>put together by those 18th century visionaries? Who >else but the actual descendants of those Founders, >that's who. That means you, white Southrons. Once you >lay down the sword, that will be the end of >>resistance. You can then expect a Constitutional >Convention to be called where, for once and all, that >18th century document is done away with and replaced >with one that more "accurately" reflects the >>multicultural temper of the times. And, Lordy, what >times those will be! >> >> So, if a "white" South would guarantee the >preservation of those institutions that grant me almost >unlimited freedoms, then let's have a White South. >> >>Elizabeth > <snip>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail