Time: Mon Dec 15 08:22:17 1997 To: repub-d@u.washington.edu From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: "Berkeley city council" Cc: Stoos@msn.com Bcc: sls References: [This is #2 for me, today.] [Is anybody else counting?] But, there was no fine, if you had previously purchased a license for same, correct? The $500 fine was to re-imburse the campus accelerator for the loss of fissionable plutonium, acquired with funds derived from said licenses. I can't help it: I have "lawyer-speak" in my veins now, having struggled so long to understand, and master it. Chico State -- Masters of the Universe. /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 06:26 AM 12/15/97 -0800, you wrote: >You guys are participating in revisionist history...the Davis ordinance only >dealt with possession of a nuclear devise. It was only Chico that had the >guts to place the tough $500 fine on anyone who actually detonated one. > >John E. Stoos >Conservative Opportunties >Stoos@msn.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: Frank Ernest <fjernest@thepoint.net> >To: New Republican Discussion List <repub-d@u.washington.edu> >Date: Monday, December 15, 1997 4:33 AM >Subject: Re: "Berkeley city council" > > >>At 11:14 AM 12/14/97 -0800, you wrote: >> >>>>>Davis, Ca. now has a city ordinance prohibiting the detonation of >>>>>nuclear devices within the city limits. This is punishable by six months >>>>>and/or a five hundred dollar fine. >>>> >>>> >>>>Payable to whom? >>> >>>Steve, >>> >>>Surely you jest, wishing me to inject such antiquated notions as logic, >>>common sense, and accountability into a liberal philosophy. >>> Gary L. Tyler >>> (gtyler@castles.com) >>> (http://vader.castles.com/gtyler/) >>> >> >>Additions to list of oxymorons: >> >>Honest Democrat >>Liberal philosophy >> >>Frank Ernest >>A Traditional Astrologer >>Horary and Mundane Astrology >>http://www.thepoint.net/~fjernest >> > > > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail