Time: Mon Dec 15 10:35:21 1997 To: "mel's fern" <fmissall@olympus.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: The incidental spy Cc: Bcc: References: Was this directed to Paul Freedom? Please confirm, one way or the other. Thanks. /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 08:56 AM 12/15/97 -0800, you wrote: >Howdy Paul, Fernie here, I looks like your popularity is going to get even >smaller, as I'm cutting you from my list. You say the greenies don't like >you, for your opinions, and I can tell you now, nor would the patriot >movement, at least those on my lists. You see, we're property rights >activists, we deal in facts, not fictions of "what ifs, possibles, coulds, >mights, likelys, etc.. real data, not manipulated data. I monitor over a >dozen different greenie lists, as do seveal others, we redirect that >information about the country, on our closed lists, to see the comparisions >in each effected area to the area we live in, and also to look at the false >information that the socialist greenies put out on that area. In almost all >cases, we do not partisapate in debating the issues brought up, for the >greens have a very simple rule: don't debate. As a few greens discussed on >some lists, to debate is to expose real truths, exposing real truths, could >confuse those that want to join us, without understanding the real picture. >In other words, they need others to support them, so they spew the lies, to >make it look like the world is coming to an end, enviromentally. Once the >main spokesperson has the less informed attention, they can easyly bend the >truths, to support any statement, for the less informed won't or doesn't >know how to check out the real truths, stats, etc... so they have faith in >the leaders to provide them with the real truth, and not question it. >In your redirecting the 430 arce clearcut by BLM, to the greenies was the >proof I needed to weed out who what sending information to the "enemy" in a >sense. You posted a few weeks ago, of wanting to start up a militia group >in Oregan. When you choose to play the devils advacate, between the true >patriot, and the greenie, your going to fail in both camps, at least on the >property rights camp. We've been at this game for quite some time now, >we've seen Spotted Owls, Marlets, Salmon, Bull Trout, Bisons, Wolves, Red >Fin Dart fish, Kangaroo Rats, you name a species, and the greens want it on >the ESA, with absoluately any proof to it's actually being endangered. >Being in Oregan, you've seen your fair share of slugs, when a green can tell >me that the tiger slug is an endangered species, something is really wrong >with that picture. A tiger slug is nothing more then a green slug mating >with a black or brown slug, thus of the hundreds of eggs layed and hatched, >some come out in the two different colors, but to call it endangered? The >same with Coho salmon, each river, stream is now having it's run of salmon >put on the endangered list, tho a Coho, is a very common fish. Turning the >facts and truths around, the greens have declared that this species is rare >and unuasal, when in fact placing any Coho eggs in any stream will produce a >return of Coho in three years regardless. By letting the Freddies, control >fishies, rather then local control, your going to end up with yet another >major clusterfu%^$%^4k up. For the government now has control over the >whole area, not the local government. Twenty plus years ago, we had very >few problems with our natural resources, today, thanks to the greenies, and >special intrest groups, most of our natural resources are starting to run >into difficulties, because rather then local control of the resources, we >have national control. If you ever took the time to "know thy enemy" read >the real agenda of Earth First, Sierra Club, Wildlands Movement, you'd >realize that they have no place in their plan for all humans, just special >"wise use" greenies. The majority of humans they want either dead, or >stacked ontop of each other in condos. This is already becoming obveous in >the Marine Santurary areas, only special intrest greenie groups are allowed >to go in and collect data, and report their findings. Funny thing is tho, >when you compare their data, with procher data, they don't add up the same. >Someone is lieing to someone here. And poacher data comes from actual >arrested persons in the "protected zone" game siezed etc... so who's lying >to who? >Anyway Paul, good luck on your repeal laws, your militia group, and anything >your trying to start, but your not going to get any information from me >again, and I'm posting this letter to several other persons, so they >understand and know why I'm taking this action. > >Fernie > >Release John Pitner, Shirley Allen > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail