Time: Tue Dec 16 05:21:47 1997
To: FTUN <FTUN@aol.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Becraft does not read his own Supreme Court's rulings
Cc: 
Bcc: sls
References: 

No.  Income has been consistently defined,
most notably in Eisner v. Macomber.

See Gilbertson's AFFIDAVIT OF APPLICABLE LAW
AND DENIAL OF SPECIFIC LIABILITY, in the
Supreme Law Library at the URL just below
my name here:

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com



At 04:03 AM 12/16/97 EST, you wrote:
>Paul,
>This may seem stupid, but do you claim 
>that you actually received income
>when you battle the IRS?
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail