Time: Tue Jan 14 18:03:35 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
id QAA05152; Tue, 14 Jan 1997 16:00:01 -0700 (MST)
with NJE id 2574 for AZRKBA@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU; Tue, 14 Jan 1997
15:45:59 -0700
V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6679; Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:45:46 -0700
Tue, 14 Jan 97 15:45:44 MST
by primenet.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA21487; Tue, 14 Jan 1997
15:26:11 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <3.0.16.19970114170546.1287eefc@mailhost.primenet.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 17:09:39 -0800
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Courtesy Notice to Janet Reno
To: Multiple recipients of list AZRKBA <AZRKBA@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU>
[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA REPUBLIC
January 14, 1997
COURTESY NOTICE
Janet Reno
U.S. Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington [zip code exempt]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Subject: FOIA request and appeal
for your credentials
Dear Ms. Reno:
This is a courtesy notice to you, and to all of those government
officers, employees, and agents who rely upon formal delegation
of authority from the office of the U.S. Attorney General to
perfect their actions under authority of the United States
(federal government), that the final deadline for production of
your official credentials will fall on Friday, January 24, 1997,
at 5:00 p.m. Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Our original request for your credentials was submitted to you
via first class United States Mail on December 10, 1996, pursuant
to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.
Our administrative appeal for said credentials, given your
failure to produce same in response to Our proper request dated
December 10, 1996, was submitted to you via first class United
States Mail on December 24, 1996.
Allowing for two (2) federal holidays, twenty (20) working days,
plus one (1) day of grace, the final deadline for production of
your official credentials falls officially on January 24, 1997
(24+28+2+1 - 31 = 24) at end of the working day (5:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time). Beyond that deadline, Our administrative
remedies will have been exhausted, and the doctrine of estoppel
by acquiescence will be activated formally, finally, and forever.
If I need to explain to you the far-reaching implications that
will issue from your failure to produce, among other things, the
Oath of Office required of you by Article VI, Clause 3, in the
Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully
amended, then Our nation is in much worse shape than I ever
thought possible heretofore.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
Counselor at Law, and Relator in People v. United States et al.
# # #
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
zip code exempt
December 24, 1996
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT APPEAL
Disclosure Officer
Office of the Attorney General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington [zip code exempt]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dear Disclosure Officer:
This is an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act.
On December 10, 1996, I requested documents under the Freedom of
Information Act (see attached). To date, the requested documents
have not been produced.
I hereby appeal your failure to produce the requested documents.
The documents that were withheld must be disclosed under the FOIA
because the original Thirteenth Amendment prevents government
officials from exercising privileges of a nobility class, such as
being exempt from the principles of open government and freedom
of information. Evidence of the original Thirteenth Amendment
has been filed with the Foreperson of the Grand Jury and with the
Clerk of the United States District Court in Tucson, Arizona
state (a Republic). See also Colorado Records Custodian.
Disclosure of the documents which I requested is in the public
interest because the information, and the procedure for obtaining
the information, are likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations and activities of government and
are not primarily in My commercial interest.
Moreover, the information requested will help to improve public
confidence in the integrity of the United States (federal
government), or to confirm that there are persons attempting to
exercise executive and judicial branch powers in America without
any authority or jurisdiction whatsoever. See U.S. v. Lopez.
Thank you for your careful consideration of this appeal.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
all rights reserved without prejudice
copy: Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
# # #
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA REPUBLIC
December 10, 1996
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST
Disclosure Officer
Office of the Attorney General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Subject: Credentials of Janet Reno [sic]
"Attorney General" [sic]
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C.
Dear Disclosure Officer:
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.
552 et seq., and regulations thereunder. This is My firm promise
to pay fees and costs for locating, duplicating, and mailing to
Me certified copies of the records requested below.
If some of this request is exempt from release, please furnish Me
with those portions reasonably segregable. I am requiring
certified copies of the documents requested, in lieu of personal
inspection of same.
Admissible documents requested:
1. Certified copy of the solemn oath of office of one
named Janet Reno, as required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and by
Article VI, Clause 3, of the Constitution for the
United States of America, as lawfully amended.
2. Certified copy of her fidelity bond or surety bond.
3. Certified copy of her Appointment Affidavit, signed and
witnessed, for the position she currently claims to
occupy. (This is an OMB-approved form.)
4. Certified copy of the formal delegation of authority,
beginning with the President, linking all officials in
the chain of command between him and the position she
currently claims to occupy.
5. Certified copy of her license to practice law in the
District of Columbia, if any.
The requested records are not exempt from disclosure because
they:
[Please see next page.]
(A) could not reasonably be expected to interfere with law
enforcement proceedings;
(B) would not deprive a person of a right to a fair trial
or an impartial adjudication;
(C) could not reasonably be expected to constitute an
unwarranted invasion of personal property;
(D) could not reasonably be expected to disclose the
identity of a confidential source;
(E) would not disclose techniques and procedures for law
enforcement investigations or prosecutions, and would
not disclose guidelines for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions;
(F) could not reasonably be expected to endanger the life
or physical safety of any individual.
[see Exemption 7 in FOIA]
If you are not the correct person to whom this Freedom of
Information Act Request should be directed, kindly forward it to
the correct person.
Time is of the essence. If you have any questions about your
rights and obligations under 5 U.S.C. 552, may we recommend that
you contact the office of the Attorney General in Washington,
D.C., for immediate assistance.
Please see U.S. Postal Service Publication #221 for addressing
instructions.
Thank you very much for your consideration, and for your timely
obedience to the controlling laws in this matter, specifically
the Freedom of Information Act and the Constitution for the
United States of America, as lawfully amended.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
Counselor at Law
all rights reserved without prejudice
copy: Janet Reno
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
# # #
====================================================================
[Text is usually formatted in Courier 11 non-proportional spacing @]
[65-characters per line; .DOCs by MS-WORD for MS-DOS, Version 5.0B.]
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., email address: pmitch@primenet.com
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [We win]
We can decode all your byte streams, spaghetti code notwithstanding.
Coming soon: "Manifesto for a Republic" by John E. Trumane ie JetMan
====================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail