Time: Mon Feb 03 10:17:53 1997
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 09:49:10 -0800
To: <commonlaw@teleport.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: ComLaw> The Freemen of Montana

<snip>
>Charles and others have taken the time and money to offer a forum to
>discussions, but with all discussions and freedom of speech comes being
>responsible for your words and acting in some form of virtue.  PAUL
>MITCHELL has demonstrated this time and time again that he is not an
>honorable or truthful PERSON!

Ralph, I regard you as a "hot head,"
and I publicized my opinion.  Now I
get an endless river of ad hominems
from you.  Please don't fool yourself
into thinking that I am going to sit
back and let you continue this 
character assassination with no
rebuttals.  I have a right to defend
myself.  You do remember "rights",
don't you?

I never posted lies on Liberty Law.
In fact, I spent an inordinate amount
of time fighting the lie that I am
some kind of government agent, which
a number of Liberty Law members swallowed
hook, line, and sinker.  Why they did so
is a most important question, imho.

You see, I KNOW I am not a government agent.
This is not an argument, or assertion,
or hypothesis.  I KNOW THIS AS I KNOW MY
OWN HAND.  That's how I KNOW it!

I repeat, I now challenge Leroy Schweitzer
to produce a verified statement that he
is not a government agent himself.  Since
I get asked that question all the time,
and since I regard it is a very good question,
I now put the very same question to Leroy.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


>
>I stand on that statement as Mr. Mitchell has definitely a problem with
>society.  He attempts to use FEAR to control and threaten[He is a federal
>witness, so beware when the NOBLE MITCHELL SPEAKS!!!]. 

I am a federal witness because I have
been compelled to testify, pursuant
to the Sixth Amendment, in the U.S.
Constitution.  If you are ever compelled
to testify, you too will become a federal
witness, whether you like it or not.

A federal witness is not a federal informant.

Many people confuse the two, and their
confusion reveals a lot about them.

If someone has something to fear from
the fact that I have been compelled to 
testify, can that fear be coming from the huge
penalties that attach to retaliating against
me and attempting to intimidate me with 
falsehoods?  That is another good question,
imho, as yet unanswered in the instant case.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


 May I remind people
>of Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws on types of governments:
>
>1)  Republician form - the "spring" is Virtue
>2)  Monarchical form - the "spring" is Honor
>3)  Despotic form - the "spring" is FEAR
>
>Despotic is tyranny.  Which one do you think PAUL MITCHELL's actions prove
>conclusively of the type of government that HE supports and USES!  He has
>contintually attempted to use FEAR if you DARE call him on his fraud.

I have published notices of my intent
to forward evidence of wire fraud to
the proper authorities.  This is my 
right.  The exercise of a right can
never, under any circumstances, damage
other people.  This should be obvious
to anyone who claims to understand
federal law, but evidently it is not.

If you want to call me a fraud, then
you had better carry you burden, 
particularly if you fall for the lie
that I am a government informant or
government agent.  I am not.  So, 
you cannot carry your burden of proving
this, because it cannot be proven, period.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



>
>The best

Is this really your best?

I doubt that very much.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>   You have been kiced off of 3 lists that I know of, the libertylaw list
that
>>libertarian one in arazona, and the NWLibertarians one that I run, whereupon
>>most of the subscribers cheered at your departure.
>>
>>   What kind of a reality check do you need before you figure out that youve
>>become addicted to a defective antisocial behavior pattern.

... like calling a hot head a hot head?

/s/ Paul Mitchell



>>
>>   I realy would like to see you make some changes so that you can fit in
>>wityh everyone else. But I will not let you destroy any of the lists which I
>>run, just because I desire to reach out to you. You seem unreachable.


Speak for yourself.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



>>
>>Charles Bruce,
>>
>>
>>On 31-Jan-97, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>>Don't let me stop you, Charles.
>>
>>>I asked Leroy a simple question.
>>>I deserve a simple answer.
>>
>>>That should be obvious to you,
>>>and to everyone else on the
>>>Internet.
>>
>>>Have you contacted Tarheel?
>>
>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>>
>>>At 03:34 AM 1/31/97 +0500, you wrote:
>>>>I am warning you Mr Mitchell. If you repeat the below tones against the
>>>>freemen, I will unsubscribe you from the commonlaw list.
>>>>
>>>>Charles Bruce, Stewart
>>>>
>>>>On 31-Jan-97, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>>>>Mr. Stewart,
>>>>
>>>>>I made no accusations.
>>>>>I asked a simple and
>>>>>straightforward question.
>>>>>I have been asked many
>>>>>times whether or not
>>>>>I am a federal agent,
>>>>>and I do not regard it
>>>>>as an accusation, even
>>>>>when the same person
>>>>>asks me the same question
>>>>>4 or 5 times.
>>>>
>>>>>I will look forward to his
>>>>>answer.  Since he and his
>>>>>co-defendants owe me quite a
>>>>>lot of money, I will attach
>>>>>meaning to any decision he
>>>>>might make to persist in
>>>>>his silence.
>>>>
>>>>>So, your request is
>>>>>respectfully denied.
>>>>
>>>>>As for the statements
>>>>>which I have made previously,
>>>>>I can substantiate, and
>>>>>have substantiated, each
>>>>>and every statment I have
>>>>>made concerning the Freemen,
>>>>>particularly their advocacy
>>>>>of racial discrimination
>>>>>against Negroes.
>>>>
>>>>>So, once again, your request
>>>>>is respectfully denied.
>>>>
>>>>>Contact Tarheel for further
>>>>>substantiation.  He has much
>>>>>of the evidence, although not all
>>>>>of it.
>>>>
>>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>At 09:14 AM 1/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>>>>>Mr. Mitchell,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please cease and decist from your unsubstantiable accusations
>>>>>>against the montana freemen on any of the lists which I run.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You have been suspended from the libertylaw list by a judgement
>>>>>>of your peers for this exact problem, and I will not tolerate it on the
>>>>>>lists which I run.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Charles Bruce, Stewart . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 16 Jan 1997, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >> > >From the "Dallas Morning News" Online:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Authorities study links in fraud cases
>>>>>>> >> > By Thomas G. Watts / The Dallas Morning News
>>>>>>> >> > 01/11/97
>>>>>>> ><snip>
>>>>>>> people who conspired to stiff Paul Mitchell;
>>>>>>> people who tampered with Paul Mitchell's front brakes;
>>>>>>> people who cleaned out Paul Mitchell's legal office in Colton;
>>>>>>> people who chauffered Paul Mitchell at 95 mph,
>>>>>>>            barely avoiding a broadside in the high desert;
>>>>>>> people who removed $50K from Broderick's private locker;
>>>>>>> people who investigated Broderick's Orange County lien;
>>>>>>> people who were requested to investigate extortion by
>>>>>>>            Broderick's associates (and other crimes);
>>>>>>> people who tried to enter Paul Mitchell's hotel room,
>>>>>>>            while he was in the room, on the telephone;
>>>>>>> people who tailed Paul Mitchell all around the Essex Hotel
>>>>>>>            in Palmdale/Lancaster;
>>>>>>> people who filmed Paul Mitchell's private lecture at the
>>>>>>>            Essex Hotel, and stole the videotape;
>>>>>>> people who were convicted as Broderick's co-defendants;
>>>>>>> people who are related to those co-defendants;
>>>>>>> people who paid Elizabeth Broderick to attend Leroy's
>>>>>>>            seminars;
>>>>>>> people who witnessed Paul Mitchell attempt to assist
>>>>>>>            Broderick at her "arraignment";
>>>>>>> people who tried to film Paul Mitchell cross Spring Street
>>>>>>>            after the arraignment;
>>>>>>> people who tried to interview Paul Mitchell as he crossed
>>>>>>>            Spring Street after the arraignment;
>>>>>>> people who smacked Paul Mitchell's companion in the head
>>>>>>>            with a video camera in the middle of Spring Street;
>>>>>>> People who told Paul Mitchell that he would be getting paid "soon";
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and so on, and so on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are probably more.  This is a
>>>>>>> media "spin" term, if you know what
>>>>>>> I mean.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
>Ralph Kermit Winterrowd 2nd (true name)
>Native Citizen of the foreign state of Kansas of birthright:
>citizen of the United States of America:
>domiciled in the Alaska territory (Privileges and Immunities of the several
>States)
>ALASKA DISTRICT of BABYLON THE GREAT
>
>If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better
>than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not
>your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May
>your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget ye were our
>countrymen.
>                Samuel Adams
>
>______________________________________________
>My Homepage is:  http://www.alaska.net/~winter/jefferson.html
>
>
>
>

====================================================================
[Text is usually formatted in Courier 11 non-proportional spacing @]
[65-characters per line; .DOCs by MS-WORD for MS-DOS, Version 5.0B.]
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., email address: pmitch@primenet.com
Web site for the Supreme Law Firm  is URL: http://www.supremelaw.com      
Ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [We win]
We can decode all your byte streams, spaghetti code notwithstanding.
Coming soon: "Manifesto for a Republic" by John E. Trumane ie JetMan
====================================================================

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail