Time: Mon Feb 03 11:24:10 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA06806;
Mon, 3 Feb 1997 10:11:34 -0700 (MST)
by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA12681
for <commonlaw@teleport.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 10:08:37 -0700 (MST)
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA12124
for <commonlaw@teleport.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 10:08:31 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 11:18:42 -0800
To: commonlaw@teleport.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: ComLaw> The Freemen of Montana
Don't let me stop you
from throwing me off
your precious list.
I have much better ways
to spend my time -- MUCH
better ways.
But then, that is not
saying very much.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 04:32 AM 2/2/97 +0500, you wrote:
>Mr Hammer/Benneth,
>
> I note with pleasure that you have offered to Mr Mitchell to
>go over to your Hammernet List. That I perceive to be good. If he
>continues to post in violation of the rules prohibiting chaos on
>this list, he will need a place where chaos is welcome. I rather
>wonder about how a list where everyone indulges in chaos runs,
>but I have no real interest in observing the process.
>
> And I wonder also, Is it possible that Snitches for the
>Federal Government are given positions of influence within the
>ranks of the Masonic Lodge? Is it possible that Mr Mitchell has
>given you some kind of secret Masonic email code signal that
>commands your instantaneous conscienceless loyal obedience, a
>sort of conditioned response, kind of like a neurotic browbeaten
>slave who lives in constant fear of a violent and compassion-less
>master? Isn't their some kind of Masonic oath you guys take to
>pledge stupidly blind obedient loyalty to people you don't even
>know if they give you the magic secret signal?
>
> Is it possible that people who have busted bunns to achieve
>the rank of 32nd degree Mason such as yourself, are given
>mandates from the skull blood drinking fraternity to pledge
>undying loyalty and support for those who seek to snitch to the
>defacto fedaralies who seek to undermine the fabric of order and
>law upon which this once great nation was founded?
>
> Hmm, Could there be some mind altering substances in the
>blood which your fraternity drinks, or perhaps it is just another
>substance coating the inside of the human skull from which the
>blood you drink therein is contained.
>
> Well, no matter; your dysfunctional behavior is not going
>to be my problem much longer if you keep it up.
>
> Like Mr Mitchell, you are now under one final warning to
>cease and desist from your chaotic and disruptive posts to this
>list.
>
> You knock it off, or your butt is out of here.
>
>
>Charles Bruce, Stewart.
>
>
>On 02-Feb-97, Jack Hammer wrote:
>>Well now look who's behaving like a spastic retard. Isn't it
>interesting
>>that the only lists CHARLES BRUCE STEWART (Federal paycheck nom
>de guerre)
>>can get on are the ones he runs with his Federal payola?
>
>>He makes it sound like getting kicked off an email list is
>indicative of a
>>social maladjustment. I think quite the opposite is true. I
>myself am
>>proud to say that I have been kicked of just about every list
>Stewart
>>runs, some more than once. I was also kicked off of Christian
>>Libertarians, now there's a real open minded list! Just write
>something
>>like biblio maniacal Christo fascist glossolalia and watch them
>come
>>unglued.
>
>>Free thinking, not for the too tightly wrapped.
>
>>-jac
>
>
>>On Fri, 31 Jan 1997, Charles Bruce, Stewart wrote:
>
>>> Your delusional Mr Mitchell,
>>>
>>> You have been kiced off of 3 lists that I know of, the
>libertylaw list
>>that
>>> libertarian one in arazona, and the NWLibertarians one that I
>run, whereupon
>>> most of the subscribers cheered at your departure.
>>>
>>> What kind of a reality check do you need before you figure
>out that youve
>>> become addicted to a defective antisocial behavior pattern.
>>>
>>> I realy would like to see you make some changes so that you
>can fit in
>>> wityh everyone else. But I will not let you destroy any of the
>lists which I
>>> run, just because I desire to reach out to you. You seem
>unreachable.
>>>
>>> Charles Bruce,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31-Jan-97, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>> >Don't let me stop you, Charles.
>>>
>>> >I asked Leroy a simple question.
>>> >I deserve a simple answer.
>>>
><snip>
>
>
>
====================================================================
[Text is usually formatted in Courier 11 non-proportional spacing @]
[65-characters per line; .DOCs by MS-WORD for MS-DOS, Version 5.0B.]
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., email address: pmitch@primenet.com
Web site for the Supreme Law Firm is URL: http://www.supremelaw.com
Ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [We win]
We can decode all your byte streams, spaghetti code notwithstanding.
Coming soon: "Manifesto for a Republic" by John E. Trumane ie JetMan
====================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail