Time: Wed Feb 05 20:25:14 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA25037; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 15:39:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 19:57:38 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Intervention of Right Dear Clients, We finally obtained the return of disk files which I was developing in Billings, Montana state, while I was there on contract to assist the Montana Freemen. The files I now want to share with you are first drafts of the following: 1. FOIA request for specific regulations (which we know do not exist) 2. FOIA appeal for same regulations (when federal government falls silent) 3. Application for Intervention of Right (when FOIA appeal is ignored) 4. Instructions for implementing points 1 thru 3 above. I would like very soon to announce this set of files, and make them available to serious Americans who want to intervene in People v. United States. We want to utilize these files for several reasons, including the promotion of the Supreme Law School, fund raising for the Habeas Project for Political Prisoners, and direct political action by exploiting the Petition Clause in the U.S. Constitution. I want to be the gate keeper for all applications for intervention, to make sure that applicants are utilizing proper and well written legal arguments. The service I will provide will cost the applicants a service fee, on top of tuition in the Supreme Law School. See Rule 24(a) in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for authority to intervene. My first thought for such a fee was $100; let me know if you think this is too high, but only after you have had a chance to review the documents in their present form. I would like some client "volunteers" to review these materials, and provide me feedback on the clarity of the instructions, and the steps involved. If you do volunteer to review these materials, I will then send you a proprietary copy of what I presently have available on disk. Please understand that these are just drafts, and they are still subject to revision. For example, Congress defined "district court of the United States" specifically in the Jury Selection and Service Act (see 28 U.S.C. 1869(f)). This finding will require a minor change to the draft Application for Intervention of Right, in which I argued (wrongly) that there is no policy for jury selection in the USDC. That was before I saw 1869(f). I hope to hear from several volunteers as soon as possible. And ... many thanks, as always!! /s/ Paul Mitchell ==================================================================== [Text is usually formatted in Courier 11 non-proportional spacing @] [65-characters per line; .DOCs by MS-WORD for MS-DOS, Version 5.0B.] Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., email address: pmitch@primenet.com Web site for the Supreme Law Firm is URL: http://www.supremelaw.com Ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [We win] We can decode all your byte streams, spaghetti code notwithstanding. Coming soon: "Manifesto for a Republic" by John E. Trumane ie JetMan ====================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail