Time: Sun Feb 16 19:22:20 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA08370;
Sun, 16 Feb 1997 13:26:36 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 19:18:12 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Murder By Committee - AIDS
>The Intelligence Journal TIJAUG / spec. (edited)
>
>AIDS - MURDER BY COMMITTEE
>
>THERE HAS BEEN MUCH TALK in recent times on population control.
>Conferences are held, such as the World Population Conference, sponsored by
>the UN, which occurred recently in Cairo. Most folks are aware of the
>Ethiopia problem, Somalia, Rwanda, stringent birth control measures
>currently in force in China, where babies born over and above the stated
>quota are denied citizen's rights and are in certain cases, especially with
>females, routinely murdered. But for us to contemplate the notion that
>there could conceivably be in force an orchestrated, world-wide population
>program, even within countries of the First World, is to raise up a spectre
>reminiscent of the atrocities committed by the Soviet leader, Joseph
>Stalin, the Cambodian butcher, Pol Pot, or by Hitler's National Socialists
>during World War 2. This notion is naturally a spectre too ghastly for the
>average citizen to contemplate and so most do not.
>Yet whether we like it or not, the evidence, in its abundance, is so very
>before us and dictates that this is precisely what is currently being
>carried out on a global scale, coordinated by a small group of master
>manipulators behind the scenes. The reduction of the world's population
>from 5.75 billion to a little under 2 billion by the year 2000 is the aim
>of the New World Order's Global 2000 plan and it is going to affect you.
>Global 2000 was initiated under the Carter presidency and was agreed to
>without the knowledge of the world citizenry by a few unelected and
>powerful groups who usurped control and elected themselves the right, as
>the enlightened few, to govern, rule and regulate the many. And, as we
>will learn, all this has been done behind our backs for the simple reason
>that we would never have agreed to the measures had we been included in the
>planning process.
>Over the course of the next few issues, TIJ will examine the whole
>Population Control question from a number of different viewpoints: from
>the victims who have been targeted for 'elimination', from the various
>authorities and agents who have been charged with the ominous task of
>carrying out their masters' wishes and from the point of view of those in
>the general population who would rather ignore the present, as well as the
>lessons of history, and will consequently do nothing to protect themselves
>physically or spiritually from what is coming down.
>
>BACKGROUND
>At the end of World War 2, a phenomenon occurs that is to change forever
>the perceptions of our world and the future of humanity. Millions of
>soldiers coming home to lonely females fuel a population explosion so vast
>that a billion souls are added to the planet's population in a little over
>one generation. This 'baby boom' generation raises the concerns of the
>governing elite (Illuminati) and a report is commissioned in 1957 by
>President Dwight D. Eisenhower for scientists at Huntsville, Alabama, to
>project the estimated impact of a continued population explosion occurring
>right up to the Millennial Transfer, the year 2000.
>The resulting report concludes that if nothing is done to curb the
>population explosion, by whatever means deemed necessary, a fracturing of
>the social and economic infrastructures will result as food and natural
>resources are depleted and fresh drinking water becomes impossible to
>obtain in sufficient quantity. The growing effects of pollution,
>desertification, environmental catastrophes, changing weather patterns, the
>conquering of traditional 'killer' diseases, better understanding of human
>and animal nutrition, and the ability of medical technology to prolong life
>are all included in the reckoning.
>Eisenhower had this to say in 1957:
>"As a result of lowered infant mortality, longer lives, and the
>accelerating conquest of famine, there is underway a population explosion
>so incredibly great that in little more than another generation, the
>population of the world is expected to double."
>A further study is later made by the Club of Rome (Illuminati) to determine
>the limits of growth. The result is the same. This report concludes with
>two basic options for the future control of the world's human herd:
>Option One: Decrease the birth rate.
>Option Two is only to be considered in the event that Option One is
>ineffective.
>Option Two: Increase the death rate.
>During the sixties, Option One is implemented with the advent of the Pill,
>abortion and hysterectomy procedures, fluoridation of the water supply, the
>encouragement and promotion of the gay and lesbian lifestyle as a means of
>zero population growth along with a handful of other measures. The US
>State Department's new Office of Population Affairs (OPA) pioneers several
>unsavoury political and military methods of stringent population control
>for application in countries deemed most 'at risk' (Nicaragua, El Salvador,
>Cambodia, Laos, etc). Thomas Ferguson, Latin American case officer for the
>OPA, gives us a valuable insight into his, and his department's,
>'humanity', by remarking: "There is a single theme behind all our work; we
>must reduce population levels. Either they do it our way, through nice
>clean methods or they will get the kind of mess we have in El Salvador, or
>in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population
>is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to
>reduce it..."
>
>TARGETING THE MINNOWS
>By 1969 it becomes obvious to the Power Elite that Option One is falling
>sadly short of projected reduction targets chiefly because the population
>explosions are occurring in the Third World. Option Two is thus brought
>out of the closet, dusted off and laid on the drawing board. Several
>operatives have remarked that the Illuminati really did not rule out the
>possibility of a limited theater nuclear conflict in order to achieve the
>goals required to meet the OPA's Global 2000 targets and, as we shall
>discover, this thermonuclear option may yet become a reality in the Middle
>Eastern scenario we have been discussing elsewhere in this Journal. But
>for now, the cryptocracy addresses the alternative of increasing the death
>rate by using methods that will largely go undetected within the broader
>population spectrum.
>One can only imagine the genuine heart-rending that must have occurred when
>certain citizen group demographics were discussed and short-listed for
>elimination. It seems all too easy to paint ALL the players with black
>hats without realising that working along with the inner core of wickedness
>is a softer middle 'gopher' core who really have a heart but believe that
>harsh measures have to be adopted for the greater good of humanity. This
>particular viewpoint is hard to gainsay for the non-believer in Jesus
>Christ. After all, when faced with such an apocalyptic population problem
>that has grown out of all proportion and control, what would you do if you
>were the man (or woman) in the hot seat and you thought it was all up to
>you?
>Happily for the greater good of humanity, there is a God on the throne of
>heaven who is discharging His Will and, for the moment, allowing Satan's
>One Worlders to have their way and their wickedness - and believe me, they
>are making the most of it. Most of the 15 strategic planners who comprised
>the infamous Iron Mountain Study Group have input into solving the OPA's
>Global 2000 population problem and it is finally agreed that the target
>groups will be the 'undesirable' elements of humanity - the black and
>Hispanic races along with the Useless Eaters: the crippled, homosexuals and
>drug addicts. The Planners decree that homosexuality and 'alternative
>lifestyles' will be enthusiastically encouraged, not only to broaden the
>selection of risk groups, but also to meet the 'Silent Weapons For Quiet
>Wars' goals for the disintegration of the family unit in order that the
>socialist hold over the individual could be strengthened. Thus, drug
>mystics and swinging gurus such as John Lennon, Timothy Leary and Andy
>Warhol begin their sordid influence on the LSD-bombed patsies of the
>Herman's Hermit sixties generation.
>
>THE MEDIA CIRCUS
>On July 1st 1969, House Bill 15090 comes into existence. Funding is
>obtained from the US Congress where $10 million is given to the Department
>of Defense's (DOD) 1970 budget. The sub-committee on Department of Defense
>is chaired by George H Mahon (Texas) This committee hosts an application
>to fund a project concerned with producing 'a synthetic biological agent,
>an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity
>could have been acquired. Within the next 5 to 10 years it would probably
>be possible to make a new infective micro-organism which could differ in
>certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most
>important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and
>therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom
>from infectious disease....'
>Sir Julian Huxley said, "Overpopulation is, in my opinion, the most serious
>threat to the future of our species." According to ONI agent, M. William
>Cooper, the project, designated MK-NAOMI, is carried out at the United
>States Army Medical Research Institute For Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)
>at Fort Detrick, Maryland and appears to take between 5 to 10 years to
>complete. In 1978, the first cases of AIDS hit the headlines of the
>western world and the awful realisation sets in that a new pandemic and
>indestructible virus is loose in the world - and apparently a virus that
>isn't particular. Anyone can become a target.
>But not all are convinced by the 'party line' on AIDS and believe the
>scientists. Several establishment experts 'shoot themselves in the foot'
>with bizarre contradictions in information that get the less spooked among
>us thinking furiously. Firstly we are told AIDS is caused by HIV. Then we
>are told HIV can be spread by saliva, dentists and mosquitoes... and then
>it can't. Condoms are supposed to prevent HIV infection, then we are told,
>'not in every case'.
>Meanwhile the tabloids feast on the HIV fear-entrails of all and sundry
>with every organ stop yanked out. The Press scare about AIDS becomes so
>virulent that virtual panic breaks out in the homosexual communities of
>Haight Ashbury, San Francisco and West Hollywood, Los Angeles. Papers feed
>the horrified, heterosexual Joe-In-The-Street stories about poor souls,
>upon receiving HIV-positive results, climbing the stairs to the hospital
>roof and launching themselves into eternity; documentaries are
>apologetically aired about killer, HIV-infected prostitutes with a grudge
>against males or sex-crazed, rape villains blackmailing defenceless
>housewives with HIV infection.
>Then there are the TV 'specials' where we see, feel and live the last,
>ghastly moments of a few of our favourite stars: Rock Hudson, Liberace,
>Freddie Mercury, Arthur Ashe... their final days, the last anguish of an
>eleventh-hour, cripplingly expensive cure that doesn't quite make it,
>broadcast around the world with their sallow, lonely and broken faces
>begging us to save them. The collective conscience of a world people
>shivers involuntarily with the titillation and the terror of it all, as
>fallen humanity realizes that all the money, super-technology, doe-eyed
>politicians and last minute AIDS rallies in the world are useless in the
>face of such a determined and implacable micro-enemy.
>The net effect? Population control. Not only Option Two... but also
>Option One.
> Mr and Mrs Smith begin looking at each other like they are some kind of
>biological warfare agent bent on world destruction and the usual marital
>cry for physical fulfilment across the globe begins to be shyly answered
>with the whisper: "Not tonight, Joseph/Josephine." Fear is the key. On TV
>and movie screens, the AIDS Monster is loosed upon the masses through
>fictional portrayals. From Philadelphia (Tom Hanks) to the British sitcom,
>Eastenders, the 'facts' about AIDS are dramatised and slammed home into the
>traumatised, collective, public psyche so all may get the message.
>The declared pathological make-up of AIDS is also a mystery. Here is a
>virus (allegedly HIV) which can creep into your system and remain dormant
>for up to 10 years and then wham! bang! you're toast. Lesions all over
>your face and body, barrier nurses face-masking around you, friends and
>relatives making excuses and disappearing... and then there's the horrible
>and pitiful death, spasming, haemorrhaging and croaking a last breath at
>your wincing attorney before becoming another one of the horrifying and
>climbing statistics. All over the world, doctors begin announcing the new,
>shocking diagnosis: "You have HIV/AIDS. There is no cure", and the poor
>wretch shambles away, pathetically attempting to hide his shame and fear
>from his family and friends until the pressure can no longer be borne.
>Hmmmmm.
>Folks, we have been put together better than an Airfix model. As usual, we
>have been conned and stitched tighter than a Thanksgiving turkey. What
>follows is a press release report by Jeremy Selvey of Project AIDS Int'l
>which was submitted to the United Nations on May 23rd 1993 and which,
>naturally, has never made it into general media circulation because of its
>explosive nature.
>
>
>
>
>SINCE 1984, IT HAS BEEN assumed that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
>is the sole and direct cause of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome
>(AIDS). This assumption is based on the postulation of Dr Robert C. Gallo
>(formally a cancer researcher from the US National Cancer Institute, NCI)
>the alleged discoverer of HIV who is currently working for the US National
>Institutes for Health (NIH) as their leading AIDS researcher.
>In December, 1992, Dr Gallo was convicted of science fraud by the Office of
>Research Integrity - an oversight department of the NIH - based on his
>declaration that he had discovered HIV. In fact the discovery of HIV had
>been accredited to Dr Luc Montagnier of the Institutes de Pasteur in
>France. Dr Montagnier has stated on numerous occasions, "I do not believe
>that HIV is, in and of itself, the cause of AIDS. I believe we should
>place as much emphasis on potential co-factors as we have on HIV."
>Dr Gallo is currently under investigation by the US Congress on various
>other charges of scientific fraud, which by their very accusation, cast
>doubts upon the validity of any of Dr Gallo's work pertaining to AIDS. In
>addition, Dr Gallo has received, and continues to receive, millions of
>dollars in royalties based on the test he created for HIV.
>Based on Dr Gallo's unproven hypothesis that HIV is the sole and direct
>cause of AIDS, the US Public Health Service1 has embarked on a campaign of
>implied terror and misinformation that has continued to state that "HIV,
>the virus that causes AIDS" can be controlled by getting tested for the
>'AIDS virus' and starting 'early intervention' in the event of a 'positive
>test result'. Early intervention is defined as starting 'treatment' with
>the drug, zidovudine, also known as AZT - a nonselective nucleoside
>analogue, DNA chain-terminating chemotherapy manufactured by Glaxo Wellcome
>PLC of Dartford, Kent, England. AZT is cytotoxic, in that it kills all
>cells indiscriminately, not just those cells infected by HIV.
>In addition, promoters of this false hypothesis state that the "proper
>monitoring of your T Cells" will assure that you will know at what stage to
>begin AZT treatment. The current primary measure for early intervention
>with AZT is when your T cells (specifically CD4+ helper cells) "fall to
>500 or below on two consecutive blood tests." The CDC (Centers For Disease
>Control) states (without benefit of scientific reference) that the "normal"
>range for CD4+ helper cells in HIV-negative "healthy" persons is 600 to
>1200. However, based on PAI's research, given the published information in
>accredited medical journals2 the normal range for CD4+ helper cells for
>healthy HIV-negative adults is 237-1,817.
>Further, in tests completed on US Olympic athletes in 1984, the average
>range for CD4+ helper cells was between 400 and 600. Certainly, the US
>athletes were not considered to be unhealthy; yet these are the markers
>used to instill fear and manipulate HIV-positive persons into taking a
>toxic chemotherapy when they are otherwise completely healthy.
>Project AIDS International (PAI) charges that this dogmatic hypothesis
>based on the findings of a person convicted of science fraud, and
>perpetration of this information by the United States government who
>continues employing Dr Gallo, is either directly or indirectly responsible
>for the premature deaths of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide.
>Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is said to be the virus that causes
>AIDS. This virus has been inappropriately named as it has never been
>proven to cause immunodeficiency in either animals or humans. Further, HIV
>is not even found in all cases of AIDS3. Koch's Postulates, which are the
>most widely accepted criteria for the definition of a disease, state three
>factors must exist in order "to prove that the micro-organism is the cause
>of a disease."
>1) "...it must be present in all cases of a specific disease..."
> Note: HIV is not present in all cases of AIDS.
>2) "...inoculations of its pure culture must produce the same disease in
>animals..."
> Note: Efforts to produce AIDS by inoculation in animals have been
>unsuccessful.
>3) "...and from these it must be obtained in pure cultures and propagated."
> Note: This has yet to be accomplished.
>Therefore HIV cannot be the direct cause of AIDS. This may also explain
>why we have "long term survivors" who are HIV-positive and without symptoms
>in excess of 14 years4.
>A paper published in 1990 by Beverly E. Griffin5 quotes two London
>microbiologists who say, "It would be irresponsible to produce guidelines
>on AIDS until an infectious micro-organism is identified and the means by
>which it causes disease are understood. It is only now becoming obvious
>that infection with HIV does not usually give rise to AIDS."
>PAI contacted the CDC several times and found that they disavowed any
>knowledge of cases where HIV was absent from AIDS related symptoms. After
>speaking with several physicians and scientists working in conjunction with
>various government offices, it was reported6 there exist over two thousand
>cases of HIV-free AIDS! However we were cautioned that, even though this
>is a public health issue, this information was (and is) embargoed.
>After much pressure from PAI, CDC sent documentation of at least 30 cases
>of HIV-free AIDS. Subsequently, as of December 1992, CDC reported 97 such
>cases. Since 1985 there have been cases of HIV-free AIDS reported and
>confirmed by serology of p24 antigen expression, polymearse chain reaction
>(PCR) and viral culture tests. In the light of the incidence of HIV-free
>AIDS and HIV-positive long-term survivors without progression to AIDS, how
>can we permit the dominant notion that HIV is "the virus that causes AIDS"
>to be perpetuated?
>This single-minded approach to AIDS research has not saved one life, and
>precludes any other form of potentially viable research into the actual
>causes, or treatment options of the condition termed AIDS.
>In pursuit of answers, PAI contacted the CDC in January 1993 for scientific
>citation as to their claim that HIV was, in fact, the cause of AIDS. An
>unidentified person at CDC stated that "it was just known" that HIV causes
>AIDS, but was unable to cite any scientific reference. In response to PAI's
>demand for documentation, three weeks later they received a packet citing
>Dr Gallo's published paper7 on the cause of AIDS that stated,
>unequivocally, HIV was the sole and direct cause of AIDS. Since PAI has
>received this document it has been reported that Dr Gallo was convicted of
>one count of science fraud for falsifying official scientific documentation
>with other charges pending.
>We would firstly question why the CDC spends so much time, effort and money
>in marketing a false hypothesis via the media and in print. By
>misinforming the medical profession and the general public and creating a
>climate of fear and despair, CDC at best is acting irresponsibly, but also
>is intentionally inflicting undue mental duress on its citizens, and at
>worst, their deception has cost the lives of hundreds of thousands and will
>ultimately result in the needless loss of millions more worldwide.
>Another nepotistic fact that has become increasing blatant is the
>propensity for the Centers For Disease Control to share letterhead with the
>Pharmaceutical Advertising Counsel9 for various AIDS educational
>publications, especially those put out by the CDC in conjunction with the
>Pharmaceutical Manufacturer's Association8 (which is also endorsed by the
>US FDA (Food and Drug Administration)). This appears to indicate an
>implication of impropriety based on the fact that the US FDA is an
>enforcement agency charged with the regulation of all legal drugs and
>therefore should maintain a professional distance from private
>pharmaceutical interests so as to remain an impartial, unbiased oversight
>agency. This has resulted in a monopoly of manipulation based on an
>unproven HIV hypothesis which is being actively marketed to the people by
>both private and government sectors for the sake of financial gain at the
>expense of human life.
>
>AZT: AIDS BY PRESCRIPTION
>The drug, zidovudine, known as AZT under the brand name Retrovir, is a
>nucleoside analogue DNA chain terminator; it kills human cells
>indiscriminately by terminating DNA chain synthesis, which is the central
>molecule of life. AZT was claimed by the manufacturer, Glaxo Wellcome (UK
>) PLC, to be the only drug of the AIDS crisis, at a time when desperate
>AIDS patients had lost all hope. Burroughs-Wellcome Company10, a US
>subsidiary of Glaxo-Wellcome (UK) PLC, alleged they were the creators of
>AZT - only after realizing that a very profitable market existed for "long
>term" treatment of "terminally ill" patients with the drug.
>Burroughs-Wellcome's statement contradicts the assertion of Dr Jerome
>Horowitz11 who claims he created AZT in 1964. This was followed by an
>onslaught of scandals alleging bribes, payoffs and cover-ups regarding the
>initial clinical trials of the toxicity and effectiveness of AZT. Despite
>the previous claims of discovery, it was uncovered by PAI that AZT was
>originally created by Dr Richard Beltz in 1961 during his research on
>nucleoside analogues dating back to 195112.
>According to Dr Beltz the reasons that AZT was abandoned were firstly that
>its extreme toxicity made it unsuitable for any chemotherapy - even short
>term, and secondly it was carcinogenic (cancer causing) at any dose. In a
>quote by Dr Peter H. Duesberg13, "Since AZT cannot distinguish HIV infected
>cells from uninfected cells, and only one in one thousand CD4 cells is ever
>infected, AZT must kill 999 healthy cells for every one cell "infected".
>AZT suppresses HIV by suppressing the manufacturing of CD4 cells,
>predictably causing anaemia, immunodeficiency and other degenerative
>diseases; thus AZT is AIDS by prescription."
>
>BABIES ARE DYING
>AND THEY'RE NOT EVEN SICK!
>An eighteen month study consisting of three dozen pediatric physicians in
>ten European cities14 states that of 372 infants born to HIV-positive
>mothers, only 13% of the infants ever acquired the HIV virus. Thus 87% of
>the infants who showed to be HIV-positive, either by presumption or
>serology, seroconverted to HIV-negative within eighteen months without
>therapeutic intervention. In the United States this has been further
>documented15 in a study demonstrating that approximately two thirds of
>infants born to HIV-positive mothers also seroconverted to HIV-negative
>within eighteen months, again without therapeutic intervention.
>>From this, one could conclude that the practice of treating HIV-positive
>infants with AZT - 1) based on tests with questionable accuracy such as the
>ELISA and Western Blot and 2) presumptive diagnosis when no clinical
>illness is present - is murder. Murder as used here means "the
>introduction of a known toxic substance that ultimately results in the
>infant's premature death." The fact that prescribing AZT is considered a
>"majority practice" is no defence for the violation of the basic human
>right to life.
>Glaxo-Wellcome PLC cites numerous studies to substantiate their claims that
>AZT both "prolongs life" and "enhances its quality". An analysis shows an
>overwhelming concern of impropriety of data based on one simple fact: all
>studies that tout AZT's benefits are made possible, either directly or
>indirectly, by grant money from Burroughs-Wellcome Foundation. Studies
>that show impartial data are done so without the influence of
>Burroughs-Wellcome and indicate that AZT neither prolongs life nor enhances
>its quality16 17. The US original Phase 1 and II clinical trials of the
>safety and efficacy of AZT were patently fraudulent and criminal in their
>application18. This information clearly demonstrates that the US FDA is
>criminally liable for violating the very laws that they are entrusted to
>enforce.
>The failure of Burroughs-Wellcome and the US FDA to disclose the facts that
>the use of AZT will result in the patient's premature death is not just
>restricted to the US. Throughout the United Kingdom, Wellcome's propaganda
>continues to cite unfounded promises of hope in an outlandish breach of
>truth in advertising. According to Wellcome's information pamphlet,
>"Positive Benefits", there are "no life-threatening side-effects associated
>with zidovudine".
>Meditel, a London-based medical television production company, filed
>criminal complaints against Wellcome with the Medicines Control Agency
>(MCA) in England. This action was based on the breach of Section 93 of the
>Medicines Control Act by misleading claims of the benefits of AZT in
>Wellcome's advertising in the UK19. As a result, Wellcome filed a
>complaint against Meditel for libel with the Broadcasting Complaints
>Commission. However, they ceased their action when Meditel demanded
>clinical registry information on persons who have lived longer than three
>years on AZT. Since Wellcome was unable to provide the required data, they
>retracted their complaint against Meditel. Still the MCA has taken no
>satisfactory actions against Wellcome for reasons as yet not made clear.
>Meditel's complaint addressed to Professor William Asscher20 states: "We
>are particularly concerned about four claims and one omission in Wellcome's
>literature about AZT. These matters are very serious as we believe that
>Wellcome's 'Positive Benefits' brochure and leaflet on AZT produced
>together with the Terrence Higgins Trust should be withdrawn immediately
>whilst these matters are being investigated."
>In a quote from Joseph Sonnabend, a renowned AIDS researcher in the US,
>regarding AZT: "It is beyond belief. I don't know what to do. I'm ashamed
>of my colleagues. I'm embarrassed. This is such shoddy science. It's
>hard to believe nobody's protesting. Damned cowards! The name of the game
>is to protect your grants. Don't open your mouth. It's all about money.
>It's grounds for just following the party line and not being critical when
>there are obvious financial and political forces driving this." [TIJ
>emphasis]
>Dr Sonnabend filed a report21 questioning the basis for the licensing of
>AZT. He was never even been given a reply from either the US FDA or
>Burroughs-Wellcome.
>Dr Harvey Bialy, a molecular biologist and science editor of
>BIO/TECHNOLOGY, states: "I'm stunned by the low quality of science
>surrounding AIDS research. I'm horrified by the widespread use of AZT.
>Not just because it is toxic, but because the claims of efficacy are false.
> I can't see how this drug can be doing anything other than making people
>very sick." [TIJ emphasis]
>In addition to the above, studies indicate that the original toxicity
>profile of AZT was fraudulently reported and is actually 1000 times more
>toxic to human cells than was originally claimed. There is in fact one
>more side-effect about which Wellcome have neglected to forewarn the
>public, as the mounting worldwide statistics will indisputably bear out -
>death.
>There is another damning piece of evidence which links Wellcome, the US FDA
>and thus the British and American governments to what can, at best, be
>described as criminal negligent homicide and at worst, genocide. Karposi's
>Sarcoma, the skin disfiguring lesions afflicting a proportion of AIDS
>sufferers, is known to be caused by excessive use of the recreational
>compound, amyl nitrite or 'poppers', which is used by homosexuals to
>heighten climax during intercourse. The world patent on 'poppers' is held
>by Burroughs-Wellcome. n
>
>1 Consisting of the Center For Disease Control (CDC), National Institutes
>of Health (NIH), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other governmental
>health care agencies
>2 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Denny, et al, vol,
>267; 1484-1488
>3 US CDC report of AIDS cases without the presence of HIV - December 1992
>4 UCSF - Buchbinder, et al. "HIV+ Long Term Survivor Study" October 1992
>5 Director and Professor of Virology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School,
>London - Nature, May 1990
>6 P.H. Duesberg, Science, September 1992
>7 Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 1:521-535 / 1988
>8 A private sector trade union of which Wellcome is a member
>9 Document Number A6 / PAI Archives 1992
>10 A US subsidiary of Wellcome, Ltd
>11 A researcher for NIH
>12 R. Waters Thesis, Loma Linda University - 1972 / PAI Archives
>13 Professor of Molecular Cell Biology, UC Berkeley and a distinguished
>member of the National Academy of Science
>14 Peckham, et al. Infant Seroconversion Profile, London - 1990
>15 New York University Medical Center Pediatric Department - 1990
>16,17 Hamilton, et al. VA Study 1990 / CDC Unreleased Study 1990
>18 US Freedom of Information Act documents - 1986
>19 Wellcome, Ltd. Brochure - "Positive Benefits"
>20 Committee on Safety of Medicines, St George’s Medical School, London
>21 J.A. Sonnabend Report on MultiCenter Study of AZT to FDA - 1987
>
>Further Documentation On AIDS
>And Population Control
>
>Behold, A Pale Horse - William Cooper, Lite Technology Publishing. Murder
>By Injection - Eustace Mullins, Deep River. Global Outlook 2000 - United
>Nations Publications 1990. The Population Bomb - Dr Paul R Ehrlich, Club
>Of Rome Publications. The Limits to Growth, A Report For the Club of
>Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind - Dr Aurelio Peccei. Deadly
>Deception - Dr Robert Willner, Deep River. The Strecker Memorandum - Dr
>Robert Strecker.
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0 on Intel 80586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail