Time: Sat Mar 01 05:49:43 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA09371;
	Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:14:51 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1997 05:47:25 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Thank you
Cc: Patricia Neill <pnpj@db1.cc.rochester.edu>

Dear Clients and Friends,

Permit me to share a compliment with
all of you.  After the loss of my mother,
and now a bad bout with viral influenza,
this note from Patricia Neill really
made my day.  

I wanted to share it with all of you.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


Dear Paul, 

Please feel free to use this letter 
however it can serve you best.
 
I was pleased to write it as a small sign
of support for your good work. 

All the best,
Patricia


Dear Patricia,

Thank you very much for this long letter.
May I have your permission to share your
letter with clients of the Supreme Law School?

/s/ Paul Mitchell


At 12:37 PM 2/28/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Paul:
>
>Thank you for your prompt response. You are one lawyer whom the public
>should praise highly. I for one feel very grateful that at least one lawyer
>has the courage to pursue the impeachment of United States District Judge
>John M. Roll who is personally responsible for over 112 felony violations.
>You claim this Judge has accomplices and co-conspirators and is acting in
>concert to violate 18 USC 242 and 241. In addition they are violating the
>prohibition against obstruction of correspondence, jury tampering,
>obstruction of justice, perjury of oath, barratry, and contempt of Court.
>
>You were skillful in countering Mr. Bauman, a high postal employee, who does
>not well use his office when he defends a judge involved in corruption.
>
>I was also delighted in how you outmaneuvered US Dictrict Judge Charles C.
>Lovell. You properly claimed by the nonsensical action of suing himself he
>engaged in the practice of law, clearly a conflict of interest and in
>violation of 28 USC 454(a). 
>
>You have another obstacle with Court Clerks. Today alterations, fabrications
>and omissions in recordings are considered part of a Clerk's job. I feel it
>to be the duty of the people to assist an honest lawyer who is attempting to
>restore order to a system that has become very corrupt. Some of us want to
>Petition the House to conduct an investigation into routine corruption in
>our Courts. We might even be able to obtain interest by House members in
>matters of impeachment.
>
>Since members of the Bar are not always swarming to your side, you certainly
>are deserving of our help. I too am in this for the long fight. Please keep
>me informed of your brave and brilliant legal actions. I hold you in high
>esteem.
>
>Most sincerely,
>
>Patricia Neill


      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail