Time: Tue Mar 04 01:52:13 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA10348
	for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:18:48 -0700 (MST)
         id TAA24958; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 19:05:40 -0800 (PST)
         id TAA24910; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 19:05:36 -0800 (PST)
         id TAA24894; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 19:05:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 22:20:57 -0800
Subject: CONCHR SLS: Grand Jury case update
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
To: conchr-l@xc.org

[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]


                 NOTICE AND DEMAND BY AFFIDAVIT

TO:       Robert H. Weare, Clerk of Court
          William M. McCool, Deputy Clerk
          James A. Walsh Courthouse
          44 East Broadway
          Tucson [zip code exempt]
          ARIZONA REPUBLIC

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     March 4, 1997

SUBJECT:  Criminal Misconduct by John M. Roll et al.


This is  to place  both of you on formal written notice that John
M. Roll  is now under investigation by the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals, pursuant  to a  complaint of  judicial misconduct  filed
under authority  of 28 U.S.C. 372(c), for his criminal misconduct
In re  Grand Jury  Subpoena Served  on  New  Life  Health  Center
Company during calendar 1996 (see attached).

Moreover, the  United States  Postal Service  has now  failed  to
produce any  constitutional, statutory, or regulatory authorities
for a  federal judge  to obstruct  correspondence directed to the
foreperson of a federal grand jury.

Last but  not least,  the United  States (federal government) has
failed to  produce any evidence, competent or otherwise, that the
United  States   District  Court   ("USDC")  had  subject  matter
jurisdiction in said case in the first instance.

My AFFIDAVIT  OF DEFAULT AND OF PROBABLE CAUSE, executed, served,
and date-stamped  on February  25, 1997, establishes said failure
as a  matter of  fact which  remains unrebutted.  This AFFIDAVIT,
and all  other pleadings  filed by Me in said case, are Petitions
to Government  for Redress of Grievances, as that term is used in
the  Petition   Clause  of   the  First  Amendment  in  the  U.S.
Constitution.

Any attempt(s)  by either  of you to deprive Me of My fundamental
Right to  Petition Government for Redress Grievances, which Right
is guaranteed  by the  Petition Clause  in the U.S. Constitution,
will be  regarded as  probable cause  to charge  both of you with
additional felony  violations of  18 U.S.C.  242, deprivation  of
fundamental Rights  under color  of law,  and also 18 U.S.C. 241,
conspiracy to commit same.

                             DEMAND

I  hereby   demand  that  you  file  all  attached  and  enclosed
document(s) forthwith  In re  Grand Jury  Subpoena Served  on New
Life Health  Center Company, USDC Case Number #GJ-95-1-6, Tucson,
Arizona state,  and that  you do  so on  or before  5:00 p.m.  on
Friday, March 7, 1997.


          Notice and Demand by Affidavit:  Page 1 of 4


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A., M.S.,  Sui  Juris,  Citizen  of
Arizona, federal  witness, Counselor  at Law,  and Vice President
for Legal  Affairs of New Life Health Center Company, pursuant to
a written  appointment to  same by  Sheryl Smith, Trustee, hereby
verify, under  penalty of  perjury, under  the laws of the United
States of  America, without  the "United  States", that the above
statement of facts is true and correct, to the best of My current
information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1746(1).

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.


Executed on March 4, 1997

/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
Postal Zone 85719/tdc

email:       pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0:
             preferred, to conserve all resources)
phone:       (520) 320-1514 (private line:
             please get permission to disclose)
fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy:
             available 24-hours per day or night)
fax modem:   (520) 320-1513 (dedicated email line:
             please call phone to switch software)
web site:    http://www.supremelaw.com

copies:  See PROOF OF SERVICE attached infra.


          Notice and Demand by Affidavit:  Page 2 of 4


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A.,  M.S.,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years

of age  and a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and

that I personally served the following document(s):

                    NOTICE AND DEMAND BY AFFIDAVIT

by placing  said document(s)  with exhibits in first class United

States Mail,  with postage  prepaid and properly addressed to the

following individuals:


ROBERT L. MISKELL [sic]            John M. Roll [sic]
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      U.S. District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state

JANET NAPOLITANO [sic]             Clerk of Court
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      United States District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state

Grand Jury Foreperson              Postmaster
In re: New Life Health Center Co.  U.S. Post Office
55 E. Broadway                     Downtown Station
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state

Judge Alex Kozinski                Evangelina Cardenas [sic]
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals     "Internal Revenue Service"
125 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 200     300 West Congress
Pasadena, California state         Tucson, Arizona state

Attorney General                   Solicitor General
Department of Justice              Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.        10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington, D.C.                   Washington, D.C.

Thomas H. Basham                   Eugene A. Burns
Federal Bureau of Investigation    New Life Health Center Company
201 East Indianola                 4500 East Speedway, Suite 27
Phoenix, Arizona state             Tucson, Arizona state

Chief Judge
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
c/o P.O. Box 193939
San Francisco, California


          Notice and Demand by Affidavit:  Page 3 of 4


Executed on March 4, 1997:

/s/ Paul Mitchell
_________________________________
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
Counselor at Law, and Vice President for Legal Affairs,
New Life Health Center Company, Tucson, Arizona state
all rights reserved without prejudice


          Notice and Demand by Affidavit:  Page 4 of 4

                             #  #  #


Certified U.S. Mail                   c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-502-472-505             Tucson [zip code exempt]
Return Receipt Requested                         ARIZONA REPUBLIC

                                                February 11, 1997

                        NOTICE AND DEMAND

Henry J. Bauman
Independent Counsel
Office of the Chief Postal Inspector
United States Postal Inspection Service
475 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., Room 3417
Washington, D.C.

Re:  Mail Fraud Conspiracy by United States District
     Judge John M. Roll

Dear Mr. Bauman:

     This is  My formal  NOTICE to  you that I have received, but
not accepted,  your letter to Me dated January 21, 1997, in which
you made  an administrative  determination,  without  citing  any
authorities, that  the conduct  of United  States District  Judge
John M. Roll does not constitute a violation of Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 1341,  Mail Fraud.  Please be informed of the fact that I
am specifically complaining of obstruction of mail generally, and
obstruction of  correspondence, specifically.  See 18 U.S.C. 1701
and 1702,  respectively.   Mr. Bauman,  there are  a  very  large
number of  things which John M. Roll's conduct was not;  but, his
conduct  clearly   obstructed  numerous   pieces  of  registered,
certified, and  first class U.S. Mail which I prepared and mailed
myself, specifically to the foreperson of a federal grand jury.

     Please be  informed that  I have  previously discussed  this
matter with  several USPS  employees, including  counter  clerks,
route carriers,  and  postmasters.    Their  opinions  have  been
unanimous in responding that federal judges do not have authority
to obstruct  registered, certified,  and/or  first  class  United
States Mail,  particularly when  return  receipt  and  restricted
delivery  services   have  been   requested  and  purchased,  and
particularly when  said mail  has been specifically directed to a
federal grand  jury foreperson.   I relied upon those opinions in
My subsequent  efforts to  bring  Judge  Roll's  conduct  to  the
atttention of  proper government  employees,  and  to  claim  the
rewards which  are now rightfully Mine, regardless of whether you
prosecute the employees involved, or not.


                             DEMAND

     Accordingly, I  hereby make this formal demand upon you, and
upon the  United States  Postal Service in general, to provide Me
with a certified copy of all constitutional provisions, statutes,
and  regulations   which  specifically  authorize  United  States
District Judges  to obstruct  registered,  certified,  and  first
class United  States Mail,  when restricted  delivery and  return
receipt services  have been  requested, and  when said  mail  was
directed specifically  to the  foreperson of a federal grand jury
convened under auspices of a United States District Court.


                       NOTICE OF DEADLINE

     Time is  now of  the essence.   If  you do  not provide  the
certified documents  demanded above,  on or  before 5:00  p.m. on
Monday, March  3, 1997,  I shall  be entitled  to proceed  on the
basis of  the conclusive  presumption that the documents demanded
do not  exist, as  a matter  of  fact,  and  that  there  are  no
constitutional, statutory,  or regulatory authorities anywhere in
federal law  which authorize  United States  District  Judges  to
obstruct registered,  certified, and  first class  United  States
Mail, when  restricted delivery  and return receipt services have
been requested, and when said mail has been directed specifically
to the  foreperson of a federal grand jury.  Your silence in this
matter will  cause a  fraud to  be committed upon Me, pursuant to
U.S. v.  Tweel, 550  F.2d 297,  299 (1977), and your silence will
activate estoppel  by acquiescence, pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen,
64 A. 932 (1906).

     Thank you  very much  for your  consideration.   I will look
forward to  your timely  and considerate  response to this proper
and lawful Notice and Demand.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness


copy:     James A. Crawford
          Postal Inspector
          U.S. Postal Inspection Service
          c/o P.O. Box 26320
          Tucson, Arizona state

          Postmaster
          Coronado Station (point of origin)
          United States Postal Service
          c/o 255 North Rosemont Boulevard
          Tucson, Arizona state

                             #  #  #



========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================

------------------------------------------------------
You can unsubscribe from this conference at any time.
Just send the command: unsubscribe conchr-l to <HUB@XC.ORG>

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail