Time: Tue Mar 04 22:02:13 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15940;
Tue, 4 Mar 1997 21:10:27 -0700 (MST)
id XAA19731; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 23:04:15 -0500 (EST)
id XAA19724; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 23:04:14 -0500 (EST)
id AA20157; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 23:04:13 -0500
by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA21012
for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 21:04:12 -0700 (MST)
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA12288
for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 21:04:01 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 21:53:33 -0800
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: More on Goddard Smear
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
I can tell you this for sure:
the federal government, and its hench persons,
has a deep, vested interest in making the
truth look stupid and ridiculous and
unbelievable and unreliable. I mean, after all,
only terrorists would burn the Reichstadt Building,
and smash all the windows, now wouldn't they?
Government people didn't do THAT!
Now did they??
/s/ Paul Mitchell
p.s. And so, next question is this:
who are the terrorists? Now vee are really
getting somewhere, ya?
At 06:08 PM 3/4/97 PST, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>
>>
>>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>>
>>On Mon, 3 Mar 1997 lawmk@cyber1.cyberhall.com wrote:
>>> 1. Expressing a conspiracy theory on the internet is not synonomous
>with
>>> "spouting off," as Stahl seems to believe.
>>
>>I agree, but what's the point? What's WRONG with 'spouting off'? If
>it's
>>banned or regulated on the 'net, the next step is regulating 'spouting
>>off' at your local council meeting, at your corner bar, on the editorial
>>page of your local paper....
>>
>>> 3. I am aware that selective editing and shooting techniques can slant
>an
>>> interview, but honestly J. Orlin Grabbe came accross as slightly
>deranged, at
>>> worst, or at best, some sort of Internet prankster. Was that really
>him?
>>
>>And the report claimed they met with him at a bar at his own request --
>if
>>true, I wonder what Grabbe was thinking about, if he considered how he
>>would come off being shown sipping a beer between statements....Donna
>
>I suspicion that Grabbe has had it over the eyeballs with the brazen lying
>of the Federal government and the mass media. If the bar was his choice of
>venue, then it was surely his way of telling them all they could kiss his
>rosy red. It was the ultimate cut of the ultimate cynic, something that
>would completely pass by Leslie Stahl and million of viewers. Orlin just
>didn't care. Maybe we should care that he didn't care. H. Ayre.
>
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: henri@Alaska.NET (Henry Ayre)
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail