Time: Tue Mar 04 22:02:13 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15940; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 21:10:27 -0700 (MST) id XAA19731; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 23:04:15 -0500 (EST) id XAA19724; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 23:04:14 -0500 (EST) id AA20157; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 23:04:13 -0500 by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA21012 for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 21:04:12 -0700 (MST) by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA12288 for <snetnews@world.std.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 21:04:01 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 21:53:33 -0800 To: snetnews@world.std.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SNET: More on Goddard Smear -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List I can tell you this for sure: the federal government, and its hench persons, has a deep, vested interest in making the truth look stupid and ridiculous and unbelievable and unreliable. I mean, after all, only terrorists would burn the Reichstadt Building, and smash all the windows, now wouldn't they? Government people didn't do THAT! Now did they?? /s/ Paul Mitchell p.s. And so, next question is this: who are the terrorists? Now vee are really getting somewhere, ya? At 06:08 PM 3/4/97 PST, you wrote: > >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List > > >> >>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List >> >>On Mon, 3 Mar 1997 lawmk@cyber1.cyberhall.com wrote: >>> 1. Expressing a conspiracy theory on the internet is not synonomous >with >>> "spouting off," as Stahl seems to believe. >> >>I agree, but what's the point? What's WRONG with 'spouting off'? If >it's >>banned or regulated on the 'net, the next step is regulating 'spouting >>off' at your local council meeting, at your corner bar, on the editorial >>page of your local paper.... >> >>> 3. I am aware that selective editing and shooting techniques can slant >an >>> interview, but honestly J. Orlin Grabbe came accross as slightly >deranged, at >>> worst, or at best, some sort of Internet prankster. Was that really >him? >> >>And the report claimed they met with him at a bar at his own request -- >if >>true, I wonder what Grabbe was thinking about, if he considered how he >>would come off being shown sipping a beer between statements....Donna > >I suspicion that Grabbe has had it over the eyeballs with the brazen lying >of the Federal government and the mass media. If the bar was his choice of >venue, then it was surely his way of telling them all they could kiss his >rosy red. It was the ultimate cut of the ultimate cynic, something that >would completely pass by Leslie Stahl and million of viewers. Orlin just >didn't care. Maybe we should care that he didn't care. H. Ayre. > > > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: henri@Alaska.NET (Henry Ayre) > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ======================================================================== -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com -> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail