Time: Sun Mar 09 05:00:01 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA25756; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 21:15:01 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 04:37:15 -0800 To: Charles Marcus <csharp@mindspring.com>, "John Quade" <johnq@qnet.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: General Delivery Charles & John, I have failed to tell you that I have set up several federal cases to force the issue of ZIP codes and USPS jurisdiction. The legal theory I am using is my belief that the USPS converted to a municipal corporation, which permitted it to sell its own bonds, mostly to foreign banks. The banks were a party to this change, and the USPS bonds which they "purchased" gave them a lien on future postal revenues. Nice security, yes? Did those banks tender any lawful consideration for those bonds? Answer: No! Under this theory, the USPS is operating as a mini Federal Reserve. Add to this the evidence now forthcoming that the USPS will step in to protect criminal judges, and obstruct the payment of rewards to Citizens who present incontrovertible evidence of criminal conduct by judges, and you have all you need to prove that Congress is also using the USPS to siphon money out of the economy. See the Bauman correspondence for evidence supporting my hypothesis. See also USPS Publication 221 for instructions in re: "foreign" addresses. Here's the form: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris c/o General Delivery Tucson 85719/tdc ARIZONA STATE "tdc" is, of course, our qualifier on the ZIP code, which has been nailed, in my opinion, as a nexus to federal jurisdiction. But, I do not have AUTHORITY yet; that was one of the reasons for the federal cases I litigated, namely, to get declaratory relief on the implications of ZIP codes. A good chart would be one which compares the Consumer Price Index (and other like indices) with the changes in first class postage! Without seeing the data, it would be my hypothesis that first class postage has climbed faster than the CPI and other indices. What do you think? Frog in the water, warming slowly, yes? /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 06:52 PM 3/8/97 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: >pmitch@primenet.com said: > >>>Well, the problem is that the ONLY part of the >>>original U.S. Post Office (as opposed to the >>>incorporated U.S. Postal Service) is General >>>Delivery (NOT General Delivery SERVICE). >>> >>>It is true that only the main post office for >>>a location (city/town, rural area) can process >>>general delivery mail, but the problem is that >>>apparently, the use of ANYTHING BUT general delivery >>>in legal process SHAMS THE PROCESS. >> >>Hi Charles, >> >>Do you have an authority, like >>USPS Publication 221? I need >>authorities, always. Quade & Lee >>are not "authorities" (if you know >>what I mean:) > >I don't have any cites for you for either, but I will >forward this to John and see if he can add anything. > >It seems to me, though, that logic can answer your >question. > >First, as for general delivery being the only part of >the Post Office left, I submit to you that the fact is, >general delivery was the ONLY 'service' available before >the civil war...there WAS no 'special' (home) delivery. > >As for whether or not using anything else shams the >process, that depends wholly on what the true source of >the 'street address' is. I submit that it is how 'the >enemy', per the reconstruction acts (and now the emergency >banking and agriculture acts) IS REGISTERED. > >Proof? I don't have any. Maybe John can help. But it >does make sense, logically, to me. One question...why >take a chance? TRY it. See if it makes a difference. > >By the way, do NOT use official 'change of address' forms >from the P.O., simply start using that as the return >'address' on anything you send, and whenever an 'address' >is requested of you. > >John? Anything to add? > >In Liberty, > >Charles > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail