Time: Fri Mar 21 18:24:01 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA04969; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:13:30 -0700 (MST) by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA08972; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:12:22 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:20:24 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: OKC Bombing Trial (fwd) <snip> > >Boy, does this hit the mark. It's interesting every time one of Clinton's >pet projects starts fading, a "disastor" shows up to bring it right back to >life. And that "disastor" gives him another hold on more power. Yes, >sounds very familiar. History 'always' repeats itself. > >emmilene > <snip> > >>WHO BLEW UP THE FEDERAL BUILDING IN OKLAHOMA CITY ? >> >>There is good evidence that the explosion that destroyed the federal >>building in Oklahoma could not have been done from the outside by a >>truck loaded with fertilizer!! >> >>According to Brigadier General Partin, a demolition expert, and senior >>FBI agent Gunderson, the blast that killed so many people, including >>many innocent children, occurred on the inside of the building. The >>signature of the explosive was that of a barometric bomb that was timed >>to go off in at least three separate areas, one of which failed to >>explode. In addition, there were shaped charges at the bases of several >>inside supporting pillars that allowed it to collapse and fall outward, >>so that the front of the building was blown out into the street. This >>bomb is not available to the public and requires an expert to handle it, >>but the federal government has it. >> >>The geology department at the University of Oklahoma recorded the blast >>on their seismographs. They reported to Agent Gunderson that two >>explosions occurred exactly 10 seconds apart. Now, one might wonder how >>all this could have been accomplished by Timothy MacVeigh? Using a truck >>parked in front of the building and loaded with ammonium nitrate? Not >>likely! >> >>So, who could have done it, and why? The federal government has the >>means, and no one else does, unless the bombs were stolen. It may be >>significant that, by a strange coincidence, all of the offices, >>including all the files of the FBI, the ATF, the EPA, and the IRS were >>moved out the night before, as testified by members of the maintenance >>crew who assisted in the move. Regrettably, one secret service man >>wasn’t told, and he was killed in the blast. But, why would federal >>agents do such a terrible thing? Did these people want to be able to >>put the blame on radical militia members? Did they want to discredit the >>“radical right” and create the impression that there was some sort of >>terrorism going on, perpetrated by people who were opposed to the >>government? Do they want more power over the citizenry? Why do the media >>continue to lie about the tragedy? Is it because the powerful wanted the >>antiterrorism bill passed in Congress? >> >>Perhaps they remembered the clever ploy of Adolph Hitler, who was >>elected Chancellor of Germany in 1933. It is documented that Hitler >>burned the Reichtag Building in Berlin, and then blamed it on >>Umstuerzleren, or “subversives.” A known communist was executed for the >>crime, and Hitler persuaded the Parliament to give him dictatorial >>powers in order to combat the “terrorist threat.” The civil rights of >>the German people were no longer in effect. You recall what happened in >>Europe, after that .... >> >>It is noteworthy that Clinton’s antiterrorist legislation was >>floundering in the U.S. Congress. Will there be more acts of “terrorism” >>in order to try to convince the people that such legislation is >>absolutely necessary, so that Congress will be pressured to pass more >>such bills in the guise of protecting our women and children from >>terrorism? What about the railroad accident in Arizona? Was it really >>caused by a group called “The Sons of the Gestapo?” >> >>There is no evidence that this group exists. Or was it an act of “Agents >>Provocateurs” -- certain agents of the ATF, FBI, ISA, or the IRS? If the >>Antiterrorist bill is passed, all of our protections under the ten >>amendments to our Constitution (the Bill of Rights) will be suspended. >>Bill Clinton will declare a national emergency. Congress will be >>permantly adjourned. The state and local police will be federalized. >>Habeus Corpus and posse commitatus will be suspended. Federal agents >>will be free to tap your telephone, seize your property, break down your >>door at 2 A.M. and arrest you, beat you to unconsciousness, seize your >>weapons, and imprison you or kill you with impunity. All this without >>probable cause -- or the suspicion that a crime has been committed. >> >>Oh, no, you say -- this is America! It can’t happen here! This is a free >>country! Well is it?? >> >>I remember growing up in the “land of the free, the home of the >>brave ....” But those days are now only a memory. Nazi types are waiting >>in the wings. And it will get worse. So what are you going to do about >>it? <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail