Time: Fri Mar 21 18:24:01 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA04969;
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:13:30 -0700 (MST)
by usr07.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA08972;
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:12:22 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:20:24 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: OKC Bombing Trial (fwd)
<snip>
>
>Boy, does this hit the mark. It's interesting every time one of Clinton's
>pet projects starts fading, a "disastor" shows up to bring it right back to
>life. And that "disastor" gives him another hold on more power. Yes,
>sounds very familiar. History 'always' repeats itself.
>
>emmilene
>
<snip>
>
>>WHO BLEW UP THE FEDERAL BUILDING IN OKLAHOMA CITY ?
>>
>>There is good evidence that the explosion that destroyed the federal
>>building in Oklahoma could not have been done from the outside by a
>>truck loaded with fertilizer!!
>>
>>According to Brigadier General Partin, a demolition expert, and senior
>>FBI agent Gunderson, the blast that killed so many people, including
>>many innocent children, occurred on the inside of the building. The
>>signature of the explosive was that of a barometric bomb that was timed
>>to go off in at least three separate areas, one of which failed to
>>explode. In addition, there were shaped charges at the bases of several
>>inside supporting pillars that allowed it to collapse and fall outward,
>>so that the front of the building was blown out into the street. This
>>bomb is not available to the public and requires an expert to handle it,
>>but the federal government has it.
>>
>>The geology department at the University of Oklahoma recorded the blast
>>on their seismographs. They reported to Agent Gunderson that two
>>explosions occurred exactly 10 seconds apart. Now, one might wonder how
>>all this could have been accomplished by Timothy MacVeigh? Using a truck
>>parked in front of the building and loaded with ammonium nitrate? Not
>>likely!
>>
>>So, who could have done it, and why? The federal government has the
>>means, and no one else does, unless the bombs were stolen. It may be
>>significant that, by a strange coincidence, all of the offices,
>>including all the files of the FBI, the ATF, the EPA, and the IRS were
>>moved out the night before, as testified by members of the maintenance
>>crew who assisted in the move. Regrettably, one secret service man
>>wasn’t told, and he was killed in the blast. But, why would federal
>>agents do such a terrible thing? Did these people want to be able to
>>put the blame on radical militia members? Did they want to discredit the
>>“radical right” and create the impression that there was some sort of
>>terrorism going on, perpetrated by people who were opposed to the
>>government? Do they want more power over the citizenry? Why do the media
>>continue to lie about the tragedy? Is it because the powerful wanted the
>>antiterrorism bill passed in Congress?
>>
>>Perhaps they remembered the clever ploy of Adolph Hitler, who was
>>elected Chancellor of Germany in 1933. It is documented that Hitler
>>burned the Reichtag Building in Berlin, and then blamed it on
>>Umstuerzleren, or “subversives.” A known communist was executed for the
>>crime, and Hitler persuaded the Parliament to give him dictatorial
>>powers in order to combat the “terrorist threat.” The civil rights of
>>the German people were no longer in effect. You recall what happened in
>>Europe, after that ....
>>
>>It is noteworthy that Clinton’s antiterrorist legislation was
>>floundering in the U.S. Congress. Will there be more acts of “terrorism”
>>in order to try to convince the people that such legislation is
>>absolutely necessary, so that Congress will be pressured to pass more
>>such bills in the guise of protecting our women and children from
>>terrorism? What about the railroad accident in Arizona? Was it really
>>caused by a group called “The Sons of the Gestapo?”
>>
>>There is no evidence that this group exists. Or was it an act of “Agents
>>Provocateurs” -- certain agents of the ATF, FBI, ISA, or the IRS? If the
>>Antiterrorist bill is passed, all of our protections under the ten
>>amendments to our Constitution (the Bill of Rights) will be suspended.
>>Bill Clinton will declare a national emergency. Congress will be
>>permantly adjourned. The state and local police will be federalized.
>>Habeus Corpus and posse commitatus will be suspended. Federal agents
>>will be free to tap your telephone, seize your property, break down your
>>door at 2 A.M. and arrest you, beat you to unconsciousness, seize your
>>weapons, and imprison you or kill you with impunity. All this without
>>probable cause -- or the suspicion that a crime has been committed.
>>
>>Oh, no, you say -- this is America! It can’t happen here! This is a free
>>country! Well is it??
>>
>>I remember growing up in the “land of the free, the home of the
>>brave ....” But those days are now only a memory. Nazi types are waiting
>>in the wings. And it will get worse. So what are you going to do about
>>it?
<snip>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail