Time: Sat Mar 22 03:05:21 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA13397;
Sat, 22 Mar 1997 20:32:13 -0700 (MST)
id WAA27273; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 22:25:19 -0500 (EST)
id WAA27258; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 22:25:16 -0500 (EST)
id AA21326; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 22:25:13 -0500
by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA21842;
Sat, 22 Mar 1997 20:23:46 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 02:47:37 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: NSSC- Urgent Action re: Red China (fwd)
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
<snip>
>>To: uwsa@uwsa.com
>>From: Nick Ivanovich <nssc@inlink.com>
>>Subject: NSSC- Urgent Action RE: Red China
>>
>> NATIONAL STATE SOVEREIGNTY COALITION
>> "Information & Action....Of, By and For the People"
>>Doc. 131 ** Urgent Action Alert RE: Red China ** 3/22/97 Pg 1 of 2
>>
>>OUTRAGE is growing as Americans realize the extent of U.S.
>>government corruption. News revelations this week bring grave
>>concerns over illegal campaign funding contributions made to the
>>White House, the Democratic National Committee, and certain
>>members of Congress by foreign corporations fronting for the
>>Communist Government of China.
>> Results of Washington's cesspool of deal-making have started to
>>surface. Americans learned of Clinton's trip to Long Beach, Calif., last
>>September to secure the lease of the entire Naval base there to
>>COSCO, a container shipping company, and front for the Communist
>>Government of China. Unbelievable, that Clinton would invite to our
>>shores the government that murdered thousands of Freedom seeking
>>Chinese students in Tienamen Square in 1989.
>> Last year a COSCO ship was intercepted by the FBI in an attempt
>>to smuggle a load AK-47s into Oakland, CA. Days ago two large
>>containers of Chinese weapons were confiscated in Calif. while on route
>>to Mexico, and identified as having come through the port of Long
>>Beach.
>> The Washington Times reported that Red China has acquired
>>control of two major ports, one at the Atlantic, and one at the Pacific
>>entrances to the Panama Canal. This breach of the Monroe Doctrine
>>was lauded by the global business community as a tactical success of
>>our 'trading partner" the Chinese. Where is the concern for U.S.
>>Sovereignty, our National Security and our ability to bring ships and
>>equipment through the Panama canal during times of international
>>crisis?
>>
>>WHERE ARE OUR LEADERS?
>>Washington Times reports, March 21, Vice President AL GORE and
>>Speaker NEWT GINGRICH are GOING TO CHINA. Apparently more
>>concerned about trade, and prepared to ignore the outrage boiling in
>>the U.S., Al Gore is going to China to improve U.S.-Chinese relations.
>>Gingrich, who leaves Sunday on his own Asian tour, said, "I certainly
>>am opposed to any foreign government being involved in any
>>systematic effort to corrupt or undermine our system... but I don't think
>>we should have large shifts in our relations overseas, based on
>>whatever this month's story of the week is, or month is." The truth is
>>these "representatives" of the people place International trade and
>>global deal making over U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY!
>>
>>REP. DUNCAN HUNTER TAKES ACTION. He and Rep. Duke
>>Cunningham R-CA, have requested a national security review of the
>>Long Beach port lease to COSCO Rep. Hunter has introduced:
>>HR1138 a bill "To prohibit the conveyance, directly or indirectly, of
>>property at Naval Station, Long Beach California, to a commercial
>>shipping company owned or controlled by a foreign country." and he
>>URGENTLY needs our IMMEDIATE SUPPORT!!!
>>
>>Call YOUR REPS., INSIST THAT THEY SUPPORT HR-1138
>> 1-800-972-3524.
>>We MUST DELUGE CONGRESS, fighting with everything we've got
>>for passage of the Hunter Bill... We don't have a lot of time... Make
>>copies of this alert. Pass them out to friends and co-workers. Ask
>>them to call and write their Reps. and send a copy of the following
>>letter to their members of Congress. Write at the top, "I AGREE WITH
>>THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN"... Sign your name and
>>address and get others to sign as well. Mail or Fax it ASAP.
>>
>>Page 2.
>>
>>AN OPEN LETTER TO EDITOR(S)...AND CONGRESS:
>> CITIZEN OVERSIGHT DENIED...
>> THE COSCO (RED CHINA) / LONG BEACH CAPER
>> By Susan E. Madori (619) 440-5237 Ph (619) 440-6524 Fax
>>
>> Under Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, "The Congress
>>shall have Power To... regulate Commerce with foreign
>>Nations..."...and under Article I, Section 10 "No State shall, without the
>>Consent of Congress...enter into any Agreement or Compact with
>>another State, or with a foreign Power..." Clearly, it is unconstitutional
>>for our military, governmental agencies, cities, municipalities,
>>corporations and citizens to regulate trade or enter into sales/lease
>>Agreements with foreign powers involving U.S. properties or
>>facilities...WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CONGRESS!
>>
>>And while it is blatantly obvious President Clinton violated his Oath of
>>Office to PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION
>>-- by twice meeting with the Long Beach Port Authority and City Mayor,
>>using the power and influence of his oval office to seduce and incite
>>elected municipal officials...and their appointees... TO CIRCUMVENT
>>CONGRESS AND VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION by entering into an
>>extended/expanded Port Lease with COSCO (Red China) --
>>Congressional implication in the Long Beach caper is just as
>>chilling...yet ingeniously subtle... BECAUSE CONGRESS SIMPLY
>>DOES NOTHING!
>>
>> Constitutionally, Congress must act by VOTE. And it is only by
>>WITNESSING CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES AND VOTES that the
>>American people can become informed...and have an opportunity to
>>respond...IN ADVANCE...on matters which may adversely affect us or
>>our national sovereignty and security. Thus, when Congress FAILS TO
>>VOTE on matters of significance... THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE
>>DELIBERATELY DECEIVED.
>>
>> When Congress FAILS TO VOTE it abdicates it's Constitutional
>>responsibility to perform it's duties, but more importantly, we the people
>>are denied OUR Congressional oversight. Such is the case when
>>proposed "laws" unconstitutionally originate in the Executive rather
>>than Legislative Branch of Government, in the form of Executive Orders
>>or Presidential Proclamations... WITHOUT PUBLICITY...requiring only
>>INACTION (OR NO VOTE) by Congress for PASSAGE. (President
>>Clinton ...AND CONGRESS BY ACQUIESCENCE...have passed more
>>than 200 such Executive Orders during his presidential term in office,
>>and few of these have ever seen the public-light-of-day.)
>>
>> Such is also the case when Congress FAILED TO VOTE on the
>>original COSCO (China)/ Long Beach Naval Base Lease, entered into
>>15 years ago...or the current, proposed Long Beach Port Authority's
>>extended/expanded Lease with COSCO. And Congress also FAILED
>>TO VOTE...in 1996...on the permanent Lease to Germany of Holloman
>>Air Force Base in Alamogordo, New Mexico. Just how many other
>>unconstitutional sales/lease negotiations with foreign powers for U.S.
>>properties...have been...are now...or will be...allowed to take place
>>without Congressional oversight, intervention, OR VOTE??
>>EVERY TIME A LAW, RULE OR REGULATION IS
>>PASSED...AND CONGRESS FAILS TO VOTE...WE
>>BECOME A DANGEROUSLY UNINFORMED PUBLIC!
>>
>>NSSC PO Box 29106 - St. Louis, MO 63126 V 314-843-3457, Fx
>>314-843-3771, Email nssc@inlink.com For more Information:
>>http://ai2a.net/~ldelclef/nssc/index.htm
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail