Time: Fri Mar 28 02:59:24 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA15270;
Fri, 28 Mar 1997 19:11:55 -0700 (MST)
by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA18364;
Fri, 28 Mar 1997 19:11:50 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:44:28 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: SNET: Clinton - COSCO - Hammer? (fwd)
<snip>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>Got some real juicy prime cuts today...
>
>Been getting much good info and intel recently from variety of
>very credible sources. I have not completed my own investigation
>to verify all details of the following items, but feel the source
>is solid enough to pass along before it gets buried on my desk.
>Would be happy to hear from anyone with PERSONAL knowledge
>(verifiable) or PROOF (send me the docs, or tell where to find)
>on these subjects (don't tell me anything about what a friend or
>relative said PLEASE!) to confirm or disprove veracity.
>
>
>CLINTON'S KNEE...WAS IT A NINE IRON?
>
>Have heard some very interesting accounts about how Clinton
>really hurt his knee. While they are slightly different, they
>confirm his parting from "friend" Greg Norman's home was less
>than amicable.
>
>According to one account, the Secret Service agents who were
>outside the house that night heard Greg Norman and Clinton
>having a fight.
>
>A few moments later the door flew open and Clinton came flying
>out to land on the ground. Norman reportedly was then heard to
>yell something about getting this mooching free-loader off his
>property.
>
>According to another account, Clinton may have attempted some
>liberties not usual for a house guest with the hostess. In this
>version Norman kneecapped Clinton with a nine iron before he
>ejected the President.
>
>This just might explain why Norman did not go to the hospital
>with Clinton.
>
>I don't suppose we will ever know the precise events, Norman
>isn't saying, and Clinton may not have been in a condition to
>remember.
>
>This was provided by a source I have reason to believe is very
>reliable in such matters. Also a couple of doctors have confirmed
>that it is highly unlikely for the injury to have occurred
>as described in the press.
>
>
>DIANNE FEINSTEIN: THE QUEEN OF DENIAL
>
>I hear that the infamous anti-gun legislator Diane Feinstein's
>husband is a paid lobbyist for COSCO.
>
>That's right, the same senator that is sponsoring legislation
>that would make available all of our former military bases as
>prisons, the same senator who was named as a ranking member of
>the Subcommittee on Technology, Government Information, and
>Terrorism, the same senator who holds committee and sub-committee
>memberships on East Asian and Pacific Affairs (Can you say:
>"Conflict of Interest").
>
>Yes the same senator who holds sub-committee membership on Youth
>Violence, has a spouse who is assisting a communist Chinese company,
>with ties to the highest party cadres, that is implicated in the
>massive smuggling of AK-47's into this country.
>
>Of course it makes sense that she would be the sponsor of
>legislation to ban the very guns that her husband is helping the
>Chinese to smuggle in...? Although it might help drive up the
>price......
>
>Let's take a closer look:
>
>She has also been instrumental in creating a 3 million acre
>wilderness preserve, that includes some interesting areas. She
>introduced legislation that ups the penalties on uppers. Well I
>guess we wouldn't want those big military bases sitting there empty
>waiting for prisoners very long, would we?
>
>We have just started looking, but we are seeing an interesting
>pattern of certain things about this woman, that we do NOT like the
>look of. Oh by the way, do you remember how she got her first big
>break in politics? That's right, two people were murdered so she was
>moved up to Mayor of San Francisco.
>
>Something stinks here and it is not Fisherman's Wharf.
>
>I know I've mentioned it before, but if some of you are still
>scratching your heads, I will give you a hint: In each of the recent
>bank robberies involving shoot ups in the street guaranteed to draw
>maximum attention, the press reports have mentioned the presence of
>AK-47's. There is MUCH more I could say on that subject, but I'll
>hold it for a slow news day... if we ever have one again.
>
>Can't resist one more shot at this: Do you get the same kind of
>deja vu feeling I do about how this smacks (sorry for the pun) of the
>way the CIA addresses drug smuggling?
>
>First you instigate the trade, then take a hefty cut, bring in
>billions of dollars worth to the US, destroy millions of lives, use
>the profits for other illegal activities, scream about locking up the
>dealers and throwing away the key, and then retire on a nice pension,
>while some poor black guy does 30 years without parole for selling a
>couple of bucks worth to one of the thousands of undercover agents
>recently hired to deal with the plague. Oh yea, almost forgot, you also
>have to raise taxes to pay for the new larger prisons to hold all
>the political, er, I mean hard-core criminals.
>
>Historical Note: In 1960, 20,000 people in this country were arrested
>on drug charges. Last year the number was over 1,000,000 people.
>
>Economic Note: It all works out, the cost of processing those people
>at somewhere around $30 Billion of your tax dollars was roughly equal
>to the cost of the CIA's budget. When you figure in how much the CIA
>made off of those drugs for other illegal activities, it goes to prove
>that government can be just as efficient as private industry, so stop
>slamming our spooks, they are the only branch of government that
>produces a profit.
>
>Last but not least:
>
>ARMAND (sickle) HAMMER: GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
>
>Was told that pursuing the next piece of information could be
>very hazardous to my health. So I decided to get lots of people
>working on it, as there is safety in numbers. And my quota of
>death threats has been filled for the month. So...
>
>What I hear is that there is much more than meets the eye with
>Foundations, etc., set up by Hammer prior to his death. And that
>the true dollars involved are absolutely staggering. (Info/docs I
>have on this now show considerably less, but this particular lead I
>trust for reasons I won't go into.)
>
>Furthermore.....ARE YOU READY?!
>
>To really follow this trail all the way could be almost like the
>Holy Grail of tracing sources and people behind the scenes. I may be
>overstating what I heard but don't think by much. It also fits with
>other pieces of the puzzle that have been falling into place.
>
>Now I am not going to go over everything here, but for those
>who are unaware of Armand Hammer's history and career, it is an
>incredible story. Suffice it to say he was an agent of Moscow
>(and the British Crown?!) and was accorded very unusual privileges
>to trade (and get repeatedly bailed out) with the Soviet
>Socialist Republic.
>
>And for the last few of today's clues: What boring stiff of a
>Vice President had a father who was in Hammer's employ for many
>years? What Whitewater prosecutor also indirectly received
>something of the largess of this industry magnate who, by all
>accounts, was more of a failure than a success the majority of the
>time, and yet continually grew wealthier? What university got
>Hammer's incredibly valuable art collection? And is there some
>really good reason that they only let small privileged numbers in
>to view all of these priceless works?
>
>Hope this doesn't keep you awake at night wondering, and don't
>come crawling to me looking for all the answers. Let's all do a
>little digging and maybe we will find the truth. For anyone in
>California where Hammer's will was probated, and foundations
>and trusts set up, you are in a better position to follow up on
>this, so please help us out.
>
>Happy Hunting!
>
>Keith Andrew Kovacs
>
>DAWN, Inc.
>17218 Wildwood Rd.
>Jupiter, FL 33478
>561-746-1585
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: dawn1@evcom.net
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail